Researcher profile

Weigang Hu

Weigang Hu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

First implementation of full-workflow automation in radiotherapy: the All-in-One solution on rectal cancer

The aim of this work is to describe the technical characteristics of an AI-powered radiotherapy workflow that enables full-process automation (All-in-One), evaluate its performance implemented for on-couch initial treatment of rectal cancer, and provide insight into the behavior of full-workflow automation in the specialty of radiotherapy. The All-in-One workflow was developed based on a CT-integrated linear accelerator. It incorporates routine radiotherapy procedures from simulation, autosegmentation, autoplanning, image guidance, beam delivery, and in vivo quality assurance (QA) into one scheme, with critical decision points involved, while the patient is on the treatment couch during the whole process. For the enrolled ten patients with rectal cancer, minor modifications of the autosegmented target volumes were required, and the Dice similarity coefficient and 95% Hausdorff distance before and after modifications were 0.892{\pm}0.061 and 18.2{\pm}13.0 mm, respectively. The autosegmented normal tissues and automatic plans were clinically acceptable without any modifications or reoptimization. The pretreatment IGRT corrections were within 2 mm in all directions, and the EPID-based in vivo QA showed a γ passing rate better than 97{\%} (3{\%}/3 mm/10{\%} threshold). The duration of the whole process was 23.2{\pm}3.5 minutes, depending mostly on the time required for manual modification and plan evaluation. The All-in-One workflow enables full automation of the entire radiotherapy process by seamlessly integrating multiple routine procedures. The one-stop solution shortens the time scale it takes to ready the first treatment from days to minutes, significantly improving the patient experience and the efficiency of the workflow, and shows potential to facilitate the clinical application of online adaptive replanning.

preprint2020arXiv

Data-driven dose calculation algorithm based on deep learning

In this study we performed a feasibility investigation on implementing a fast and accurate dose calculation based on a deep learning technique. A two dimensional (2D) fluence map was first converted into a three dimensional (3D) volume using ray traversal algorithm. A 3D U-Net like deep residual network was then established to learn a mapping between this converted 3D volume, CT and 3D dose distribution. Therefore an indirect relationship was built between a fluence map and its corresponding 3D dose distribution without using significantly complex neural networks. 200 patients, including nasopharyngeal, lung, rectum and breast cancer cases, were collected and applied to train the proposed network. Additional 47 patients were randomly selected to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed method through comparing dose distributions, dose volume histograms (DVH) and clinical indices with the results from a treatment planning system (TPS), which was used as the ground truth in this study. Results: The proposed deep learning based dose calculation algorithm achieved good predictive performance. For 47 tested patients, the average per-voxel bias of the deep learning calculated value and standard deviation (normalized to the prescription), relative to the TPS calculation, is 0.17%. The average deep learning calculated values and standard deviations for relevant clinical indices were compared with the TPS calculated results and the t-test p-values demonstrated the consistency between them. Conclusions: In this study we developed a new deep learning based dose calculation method. This approach was evaluated by the clinical cases with different sites. Our results demonstrated its feasibility and reliability and indicated its great potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of radiation dose calculation for different treatment modalities