BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
We construct total orders on the vertex set of an oriented tree. The orders are based only on up-down counts at the interior vertices and the edges along the unique geodesic from a given vertex to another. As an application, we provide a short proof (modulo Bass-Serre theory) of Vinogradov's result that the free product of left-orderable groups is left-orderable.
Let G be a group and H be a subgroup of G. We say that H is left relatively convex in G if the left G-set G/H has at least one G-invariant order; when G is left orderable, this holds if and only if H is convex in G under some left ordering of G. We give a criterion for H to be left relatively convex in G that generalizes a famous theorem of Burns and Hale and has essentially the same proof. We show that all maximal cyclic subgroups are left relatively convex in free groups, in right-angled Artin groups, and in surface groups that are not the Klein-bottle group. The free-group case extends a result of Duncan and Howie. We show that if G is left orderable, then each free factor of G is left relatively convex in G. More generally, for any graph of groups, if each edge group is left relatively convex in each of its vertex groups, then each vertex group is left relatively convex in the fundamental group; this generalizes a result of Chiswell. We show that all maximal cyclic subgroups in locally residually torsion-free nilpotent groups are left relatively convex.
Let F be a finite-rank free group and H be a finite-rank subgroup of F. We discuss proofs of two algorithms that sandwich H between an upper-layer free-product factor of F that contains H and a lower-layer free-product factor of F that is contained in H. Richard Stong showed that the unique smallest-possible upper layer, denoted Cl(H), is visible in the output of the polynomial-time cut-vertex algorithm of J. H. C. Whitehead. Stong's proof used bi-infinite paths in a Cayley tree and sub-surfaces of a three-manifold. We give a variant of his proof that uses edge-cuts of the Cayley tree induced by edge-cuts of a Bass-Serre tree. A. Clifford and R. Z. Goldstein gave an exponential-time algorithm that determines whether or not the trivial subgroup is the only possible lower layer. Their proof used Whitehead's three-manifold techniques. We give a variant of their proof that uses Whitehead's cut-vertex results, and thereby obtain a somewhat simpler algorithm that yields a lower layer of maximum-possible rank.
Let m,m′,r,r′,t,t′ be positive integers with r,r′≥2. Let Lr denote the ring that is universal with an invertible 1×r matrix. Let Mm(Lr⊗t) denote the ring of m×m matrices over the tensor product of t copies of Lr. In a natural way, Mm(Lr⊗t) is a partially ordered ring with involution. Let PUm(Lr⊗t) denote the group of positive unitary elements. We show that PUm(Lr⊗t) is isomorphic to the Brin-Higman-Thompson group tVr,m; the case t=1 was found by Pardo, that is, PUm(Lr) is isomorphic to the Higman-Thompson group Vr,m. We survey arguments of Abrams, Ánh, Bleak, Brin, Higman, Lanoue, Pardo, and Thompson that prove that t′Vr′,m′≅tVr,m if and only if r′=r, t′=t and gcd(m′,r′−1)=gcd(m,r−1) (if and only if Mm′(Lr′⊗t′) and Mm(Lr⊗t) are isomorphic as partially ordered rings with involution).
For a connected graph L, let G(L) be a group with generators the vertex set of L, subject only to the relations that the ends of each edge commute. Now let H(L) be the kernel of the homomorphism from G(L) to the integers that takes each vertex to 1. M. Bestvina and N. Brady have shown that finiteness properties of H(L) are intimately related to the topology of the clique complex of L. We give a presentation for H(L), with generators the edges of L, and an infinite family of relators for each 1-cycle in L. In the case when the clique complex for L is simply-connected, we give a finite presentation for H(L), with generators the edges (or 2-cliques) of L, and two relators for each 3-clique in L.
Let R be a ring (associative, with 1), and let R<<a,b>> denote the power-series R-ring in two non-commuting, R-centralizing variables, a and b. Let A be an R-subring of R<<a>> and B be an R-subring of R<<b>>, and let α denote the natural map A⨿RB→R<<a,b>>. This article describes some situations where α is injective and some where it is not. We prove that if A is a right Ore localization of R[a] and B is a right Ore localization of R[b], then α is injective. For example, the group ring over R of the free group on {1+a,1+b} is R[(1+a)±1]⨿RR[(1+b)±1], which then embeds in R<<a,b>>. We thus recover a celebrated result of R H Fox, via a proof simpler than those previously known. We show that α is injective if R is \textit{Π-semihereditary}, that is, every finitely generated, torsionless, right R-module is projective. The article concludes with some results contributed by G M Bergman that describe situations where α is not injective. He shows that if R is commutative and w.gl.dimR≥2, then there exist examples where the map α′:A⨿RB→R<<a>>⨿RR<<b>> is not injective, and hence neither is α. It follows from a result of K R Goodearl that when R is a commutative, countable, non-self-injective, von Neumann regular ring, the map α":R<<a>>⨿RR<<b>>→R<<a,b>> is not injective. Bergman gives procedures for constructing other examples where α" is not injective.
Let g and p be non-negative integers. Let A(g,p) denote the group consisting of all those automorphisms of the free group on {t_1,...,t_p, x_1,...,x_g, y_1,...y_g} which fix the element t_1t_2...t_p[x_1,y_1]...[x_g,y_g] and permute the set of conjugacy classes {[t_1],....,[t_p]}. Labruère and Paris, building on work of Artin, Magnus, Dehn, Nielsen, Lickorish, Zieschang, Birman, Humphries, and others, showed that A(g,p) is generated by a set that is called the ADLH set. We use methods of Zieschang and McCool to give a self-contained, algebraic proof of this result. Labruère and Paris also gave defining relations for the ADLH set in A(g,p); we do not know an algebraic proof of this for g > 1. Consider an orientable surface S(g,p) of genus g with p punctures, such that (g,p) is not (0,0) or (0,1). The algebraic mapping-class group of S(g,p), denoted M(g,p), is defined as the group of all those outer automorphisms of the one-relator group with generating set {t_1,...,t_p, x_1,...,x_g, y_1,...y_g} and relator t_1t_2...t_p[x_1,y_1]...[x_g,y_g] which permute the set of conjugacy classes {[t_1],....,[t_p]}. It now follows from a result of Nielsen that M(g,p) is generated by the image of the ADLH set together with a reflection. This gives a new way of seeing that M(g,p) equals the (topological) mapping-class group of S(g,p), along lines suggested by Magnus, Karrass, and Solitar in 1966.
For a group H and a subset X of H, we let HX denote the set {hxh−1∣h∈H,x∈X}, and when X is a free-generating set of H, we say that the set HX is a Whitehead subset of H. For a group F and an element r of F, we say that r is Cohen-Lyndon aspherical in F if F{r} is a Whitehead subset of the subgroup of F that is generated by F{r}. In 1963, D. E. Cohen and R. C. Lyndon independently showed that in each free group each non-trivial element is Cohen-Lyndon aspherical. In 1987, M. Edjvet and J. Howie showed that if A and B are locally indicable groups, then each cyclically reduced element of A∗B that does not lie in A∪B is Cohen-Lyndon aspherical in A∗B. Using Bass-Serre Theory and the Edjvet-Howie Theorem, one can deduce the local-indicability Cohen-Lyndon Theorem: if F is a locally indicable group and T is an F-tree with trivial edge stabilizers, then each element of F that fixes no vertex of T is Cohen-Lyndon aspherical in F. Conversely, the Cohen-Lyndon Theorem and the Edjvet-Howie Theorem are immediate consequences of the local-indicability Cohen-Lyndon Theorem. In this article, we give a detailed review of Howie induction and arrange the arguments of Edjvet and Howie into a Howie-inductive proof of the local-indicability Cohen-Lyndon Theorem that does not use Magnus induction or the Cohen-Lyndon Theorem. We conclude with a review of some standard applications of Cohen-Lyndon asphericity.
Recently Dicks-Linnell determined the L2-Betti numbers of the orientable surface-plus-one-relation groups, and their arguments involved some results that were obtained topologically by Hempel and Howie. Using algebraic arguments, we now extend all these results of Hempel and Howie to a larger class of two-relator groups, and we then apply the extended results to determine the L2-Betti numbers of the non-orientable surface-plus-one-relation groups.
To each once-punctured-torus bundle, Tϕ, over the circle with pseudo-Anosov monodromy ϕ, there are associated two tessellations of the complex plane: one, Δ(ϕ), is (the projection from ∞ of) the triangulation of a horosphere at ∞ induced by the canonical decomposition into ideal tetrahedra, and the other, CW(ϕ), is a fractal tessellation given by the Cannon-Thurston map of the fiber group switching back and forth between gray and white each time it passes through ∞. In this paper, we study the relation between Δ(ϕ) and CW(ϕ).
This article surveys many standard results about the braid group with emphasis on simplifying the usual algebraic proofs. We use van der Waerden's trick to illuminate the Artin-Magnus proof of the classic presentation of the algebraic mapping-class group of a punctured disc. We give a simple, new proof of the Dehornoy-Larue braid-group trichotomy, and, hence, recover the Dehornoy right-ordering of the braid group. We then turn to the Birman-Hilden theorem concerning braid-group actions on free products of cyclic groups, and the consequences derived by Perron-Vannier, and the connections with the Wada representations. We recall the very simple Crisp-Paris proof of the Birman-Hilden theorem that uses the Larue-Shpilrain technique. Studying ends of free groups permits a deeper understanding of the braid group; this gives us a generalization of the Birman-Hilden theorem. Studying Jordan curves in the punctured disc permits a still deeper understanding of the braid group; this gave Larue, in his PhD thesis, correspondingly deeper results, and, in an appendix, we recall the essence of Larue's thesis, giving simpler combinatorial proofs.
Let G be a group, let T be an (oriented) G-tree with finite edge stabilizers, and let VT denote the vertex set of T. We show that, for each G-retract V' of the G-set VT, there exists a G-tree whose edge stabilizers are finite and whose vertex set is V'. This fact leads to various new consequences of the almost stability theorem. We also give an example of a group G, a G-tree T and a G-retract V' of VT such that no G-tree has vertex set V'.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.