Researcher profile

Lluís Bacardit

Lluís Bacardit contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2011arXiv

The Zieschang-McCool method for generating algebraic mapping-class groups

Let g and p be non-negative integers. Let A(g,p) denote the group consisting of all those automorphisms of the free group on {t_1,...,t_p, x_1,...,x_g, y_1,...y_g} which fix the element t_1t_2...t_p[x_1,y_1]...[x_g,y_g] and permute the set of conjugacy classes {[t_1],....,[t_p]}. Labruère and Paris, building on work of Artin, Magnus, Dehn, Nielsen, Lickorish, Zieschang, Birman, Humphries, and others, showed that A(g,p) is generated by a set that is called the ADLH set. We use methods of Zieschang and McCool to give a self-contained, algebraic proof of this result. Labruère and Paris also gave defining relations for the ADLH set in A(g,p); we do not know an algebraic proof of this for g > 1. Consider an orientable surface S(g,p) of genus g with p punctures, such that (g,p) is not (0,0) or (0,1). The algebraic mapping-class group of S(g,p), denoted M(g,p), is defined as the group of all those outer automorphisms of the one-relator group with generating set {t_1,...,t_p, x_1,...,x_g, y_1,...y_g} and relator t_1t_2...t_p[x_1,y_1]...[x_g,y_g] which permute the set of conjugacy classes {[t_1],....,[t_p]}. It now follows from a result of Nielsen that M(g,p) is generated by the image of the ADLH set together with a reflection. This gives a new way of seeing that M(g,p) equals the (topological) mapping-class group of S(g,p), along lines suggested by Magnus, Karrass, and Solitar in 1966.

preprint2010arXiv

A combinatorial algorithm to compute presentations of mapping-class groups of orientable surfaces with one boundary component

We give an algorithm which computes a presentation for a subgroup, denoted $\AM_{g,1,p}$, of the automorphism group of a free group. It is known that $\AM_{g,1,p}$ is isomorphic to the mapping-class group of an orientable genus-$g$ surface with one boundary component and $p$ punctures. We define a variation of Auter space.

preprint2007arXiv

Actions of the braid group, and new algebraic proofs of results of Dehornoy and Larue

This article surveys many standard results about the braid group with emphasis on simplifying the usual algebraic proofs. We use van der Waerden's trick to illuminate the Artin-Magnus proof of the classic presentation of the algebraic mapping-class group of a punctured disc. We give a simple, new proof of the Dehornoy-Larue braid-group trichotomy, and, hence, recover the Dehornoy right-ordering of the braid group. We then turn to the Birman-Hilden theorem concerning braid-group actions on free products of cyclic groups, and the consequences derived by Perron-Vannier, and the connections with the Wada representations. We recall the very simple Crisp-Paris proof of the Birman-Hilden theorem that uses the Larue-Shpilrain technique. Studying ends of free groups permits a deeper understanding of the braid group; this gives us a generalization of the Birman-Hilden theorem. Studying Jordan curves in the punctured disc permits a still deeper understanding of the braid group; this gave Larue, in his PhD thesis, correspondingly deeper results, and, in an appendix, we recall the essence of Larue's thesis, giving simpler combinatorial proofs.