BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Vladimir Kanovei

Vladimir Kanovei contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.LOmath.HOmath.CAmath.DG

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A model in which the Separation principle holds for a given effective projective Sigma-class

In this paper, we prove the following: If $n\ge3$, there is a generic extension of $L$ -- the constructible universe -- in which it is true that the Separation principle holds for both effective (lightface) classes $\varSigma^1_n$ and $\varPi^1_n$ for sets of integers. The result was announced long ago by Leo Harrington with a sketch of the proof for $n=3$; its full proof has never been presented. Our methods are based on a countable product of almost-disjoint forcing notions independent in the sense of Jensen--Solovay.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Continuity between Cauchy and Bolzano: Issues of antecedents and priority

In a paper published in 1970, Grattan-Guinness argued that Cauchy, in his 1821 book Cours d'Analyse, may have plagiarized Bolzano's book Rein analytischer Beweis (RB), first published in 1817. That paper was subsequently discredited in several works, but some of its assumptions still prevail today. In particular, it is usually considered that Cauchy did not develop his notion of the continuity of a function before Bolzano developed his in RB, and that both notions are essentially the same. We argue that both assumptions are incorrect, and that it is implausible that Cauchy's initial insight into that notion, which eventually evolved to an approach using infinitesimals, could have been borrowed from Bolzano's work. Furthermore, we account for Bolzano's interest in that notion and focus on his discussion of a definition by Kästner (in Section 183 of his 1766 book), which the former seems to have misrepresented at least partially. Cauchy's treatment of continuity goes back at least to his 1817 course summaries, refuting a key component of Grattan-Guinness' plagiarism hypothesis (that Cauchy may have lifted continuity from RB after reading it in a Paris library in 1818). We explore antecedents of Cauchy and Bolzano continuity in the writings of Kästner and earlier authors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Metric completions, the Heine-Borel property, and approachability

We show that the metric universal cover of a plane with a puncture yields an example of a nonstandard hull properly containing the metric completion of a metric space. As mentioned by do Carmo, a nonextendible Riemannian manifold can be noncomplete, but in the broader category of metric spaces it becomes extendible. We give a short proof of a characterisation of the Heine-Borel property of the metric completion of a metric space M in terms of the absence of inapproachable finite points in *M.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

19th century real analysis, forward and backward

19th century real analysis received a major impetus from Cauchy's work. Cauchy mentions variable quantities, limits, and infinitesimals, but the meaning he attached to these terms is not identical to their modern meaning. Some Cauchy historians work in a conceptual scheme dominated by an assumption of a teleological nature of the evolution of real analysis toward a preordained outcome. Thus, Gilain and Siegmund-Schultze assume that references to limite in Cauchy's work necessarily imply that Cauchy was working with an Archi-medean continuum, whereas infinitesimals were merely a convenient figure of speech, for which Cauchy had in mind a complete justification in terms of Archimedean limits. However, there is another formalisation of Cauchy's procedures exploiting his limite, more consistent with Cauchy's ubiquitous use of infinitesimals, in terms of the standard part principle of modern infinitesimal analysis. We challenge a misconception according to which Cauchy was allegedly forced to teach infinitesimals at the Ecole Polytechnique. We show that the debate there concerned mainly the issue of rigor, a separate one from infinitesimals. A critique of Cauchy's approach by his contemporary de Prony sheds light on the meaning of rigor to Cauchy and his contemporaries. An attentive reading of Cauchy's work challenges received views on Cauchy's role in the history of analysis, and indicates that he was a pioneer of infinitesimal techniques as much as a harbinger of the Epsilontik.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

On automorphisms behind the Gitik -- Koepke model for violation of the Singular Cardinals Hypothesis w/o large cardinals

It is known that the assumption that ``GCH first fails at \aleph_ω'' leads to large cardinals in ZFC. Gitik and Koepke have demonstrated that this is not so in ZF: namely there is a generic cardinal-preserving extension of L (or any universe of ZFC + GCH in which all ZF axioms hold, the axiom of choice fails, GCH holds for all cardinals \aleph_n, but there is a surjection from PowerSet(\aleph_ω) onto λ, where λ is any previously chosen cardinal in L greater than \aleph_ω, for instance, \aleph_{ω+17}. In other words, in such an extension GCH holds in proper sense for all cardinals \aleph_n but fails at \aleph_ω in Hartogs' sense. The goal of this note is to analyse the system of automorphisms involved in the Gitik -- Koepke proof.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1997arXiv

A version of the Jensen-Johnsbråten coding at arbitrary level $n\geq 3$

Theorem: Let $n\ge 2.$ There is a CCC in $L$ forcing notion $P=P_n\in L$ such that $P$-generic extensions of $L$ are of the form $L[a],$ where $a\subseteqω$ and 1) $a$ is $Δ^1_{n+1}$ in $L[a]$; and 2) if $b\in L[a],$ $b\subseteqω$ is $Σ^1_n$ in $L[a]$ then $b\in L$ and $b$ is $Σ^1_n$ in $L$. In addition, if a model $M$ extends $L$ and contains two different $P$-generic sets $a,\,a'\subseteqω,$ then $ω^M_1 > ω^L_1$. Comment: For $n=2,$ this is a result of Jensen and Johnsbråten, 1974. In this case, 2) is a corollary of the Shoenfield absoluteness theorem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access