Source author record

Andrea Lincoln

Andrea Lincoln appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Data Structures and Algorithms Computational Complexity Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

New Techniques for Proving Fine-Grained Average-Case Hardness

The recent emergence of fine-grained cryptography strongly motivates developing an average-case analogue of Fine-Grained Complexity (FGC). This paper defines new versions of OV, $k$SUM and zero-$k$-clique that are both worst-case and average-case fine-grained hard assuming the core hypotheses of FGC. We then use these as a basis for fine-grained hardness and average-case hardness of other problems. The new problems represent their inputs in a certain ``factored'' form. We call them ``factored''-OV, ``factored''-zero-$k$-clique and ``factored''-$3$SUM. We show that factored-$k$-OV and factored $k$SUM are equivalent and are complete for a class of problems defined over Boolean functions. Factored zero-$k$-clique is also complete, for a different class of problems. Our hard factored problems are also simple enough that we can reduce them to many other problems, e.g.~to edit distance, $k$-LCS and versions of Max-Flow. We further consider counting variants of the factored problems and give WCtoACFG reductions for them for a natural distribution. Through FGC reductions we then get average-case hardness for well-studied problems like regular expression matching from standard worst-case FGC assumptions. To obtain our WCtoACFG reductions, we formalize the framework of [Boix-Adsera et al. 2019] that was used to give a WCtoACFG reduction for counting $k$-cliques. We define an explicit property of problems such that if a problem has that property one can use the framework on the problem to get a WCtoACFG self reduction. We then use the framework to slightly extend Boix-Adsera et al.'s average-case counting $k$-cliques result to average-case hardness for counting arbitrary subgraph patterns of constant size in $k$-partite graphs...

preprint2020arXiv

Tight Hardness for Shortest Cycles and Paths in Sparse Graphs

Fine-grained reductions have established equivalences between many core problems with $\tilde{O}(n^3)$-time algorithms on $n$-node weighted graphs, such as Shortest Cycle, All-Pairs Shortest Paths (APSP), Radius, Replacement Paths, Second Shortest Paths, and so on. These problems also have $\tilde{O}(mn)$-time algorithms on $m$-edge $n$-node weighted graphs, and such algorithms have wider applicability. Are these $mn$ bounds optimal when $m \ll n^2$? Starting from the hypothesis that the minimum weight $(2\ell+1)$-Clique problem in edge weighted graphs requires $n^{2\ell+1-o(1)}$ time, we prove that for all sparsities of the form $m = Θ(n^{1+1/\ell})$, there is no $O(n^2 + mn^{1-ε})$ time algorithm for $ε>0$ for \emph{any} of the below problems: Minimum Weight $(2\ell+1)$-Cycle in a directed weighted graph, Shortest Cycle in a directed weighted graph, APSP in a directed or undirected weighted graph, Radius (or Eccentricities) in a directed or undirected weighted graph, Wiener index of a directed or undirected weighted graph, Replacement Paths in a directed weighted graph, Second Shortest Path in a directed weighted graph, Betweenness Centrality of a given node in a directed weighted graph. That is, we prove hardness for a variety of sparse graph problems from the hardness of a dense graph problem. Our results also lead to new conditional lower bounds from several related hypothesis for unweighted sparse graph problems including $k$-cycle, shortest cycle, Radius, Wiener index and APSP.

preprint2016arXiv

Deterministic Time-Space Tradeoffs for k-SUM

Given a set of numbers, the $k$-SUM problem asks for a subset of $k$ numbers that sums to zero. When the numbers are integers, the time and space complexity of $k$-SUM is generally studied in the word-RAM model; when the numbers are reals, the complexity is studied in the real-RAM model, and space is measured by the number of reals held in memory at any point. We present a time and space efficient deterministic self-reduction for the $k$-SUM problem which holds for both models, and has many interesting consequences. To illustrate: * $3$-SUM is in deterministic time $O(n^2 \lg\lg(n)/\lg(n))$ and space $O\left(\sqrt{\frac{n \lg(n)}{\lg\lg(n)}}\right)$. In general, any polylogarithmic-time improvement over quadratic time for $3$-SUM can be converted into an algorithm with an identical time improvement but low space complexity as well. * $3$-SUM is in deterministic time $O(n^2)$ and space $O(\sqrt n)$, derandomizing an algorithm of Wang. * A popular conjecture states that 3-SUM requires $n^{2-o(1)}$ time on the word-RAM. We show that the 3-SUM Conjecture is in fact equivalent to the (seemingly weaker) conjecture that every $O(n^{.51})$-space algorithm for $3$-SUM requires at least $n^{2-o(1)}$ time on the word-RAM. * For $k \ge 4$, $k$-SUM is in deterministic $O(n^{k - 2 + 2/k})$ time and $O(\sqrt{n})$ space.

preprint2015arXiv

Improved Connectivity Condition for Byzantine Fault Tolerance

Given a network in which some pairs of nodes can communicate freely, and some subsets of the nodes could be faulty and colluding to disrupt communication, when can messages reliably be sent from one given node to another? We give a new characterization of when the agreement problem can be solved and provide an agreement algorithm which can reach agreement when the number of Byzantine nodes along each minimal vertex cut is bounded. Our new bound holds for a strict superset of cases than the previously known bound. We show that the new bound is tight. Furthermore, we show that this algorithm does not require the processes to know the graph structure, as the previously known algorithm did. Finally, we explore some of the situations in which we can reach agreement if we assume that individual nodes or entire subgraphs are trustworthy.