Researcher profile

Velibor V. Mišić

Velibor V. Mišić contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

math.OC Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline

3works

0followers

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Randomized Policy Optimization for Optimal Stopping

Optimal stopping is the problem of determining when to stop a stochastic system in order to maximize reward, which is of practical importance in domains such as finance, operations management and healthcare. Existing methods for high-dimensional optimal stopping that are popular in practice produce deterministic linear policies -- policies that deterministically stop based on the sign of a weighted sum of basis functions -- but are not guaranteed to find the optimal policy within this policy class given a fixed basis function architecture. In this paper, we propose a new methodology for optimal stopping based on randomized linear policies, which choose to stop with a probability that is determined by a weighted sum of basis functions. We motivate these policies by establishing that under mild conditions, given a fixed basis function architecture, optimizing over randomized linear policies is equivalent to optimizing over deterministic linear policies. We formulate the problem of learning randomized linear policies from data as a smooth non-convex sample average approximation (SAA) problem. We theoretically prove the almost sure convergence of our randomized policy SAA problem and establish bounds on the out-of-sample performance of randomized policies obtained from our SAA problem based on Rademacher complexity. We also show that the SAA problem is in general NP-Hard, and consequently develop a practical heuristic for solving our randomized policy problem. Through numerical experiments on a benchmark family of option pricing problem instances, we show that our approach can substantially outperform state-of-the-art methods.

preprint2019arXiv

Interpretable Optimal Stopping

Optimal stopping is the problem of deciding when to stop a stochastic system to obtain the greatest reward, arising in numerous application areas such as finance, healthcare and marketing. State-of-the-art methods for high-dimensional optimal stopping involve approximating the value function or the continuation value, and then using that approximation within a greedy policy. Although such policies can perform very well, they are generally not guaranteed to be interpretable; that is, a decision maker may not be able to easily see the link between the current system state and the policy's action. In this paper, we propose a new approach to optimal stopping, wherein the policy is represented as a binary tree, in the spirit of naturally interpretable tree models commonly used in machine learning. We show that the class of tree policies is rich enough to approximate the optimal policy. We formulate the problem of learning such policies from observed trajectories of the stochastic system as a sample average approximation (SAA) problem. We prove that the SAA problem converges under mild conditions as the sample size increases, but that computationally even immediate simplifications of the SAA problem are theoretically intractable. We thus propose a tractable heuristic for approximately solving the SAA problem, by greedily constructing the tree from the top down. We demonstrate the value of our approach by applying it to the canonical problem of option pricing, using both synthetic instances and instances using real S&P-500 data. Our method obtains policies that (1) outperform state-of-the-art non-interpretable methods, based on simulation-regression and martingale duality, and (2) possess a remarkably simple and intuitive structure.

preprint2014arXiv

A Comparison of Monte Carlo Tree Search and Mathematical Optimization for Large Scale Dynamic Resource Allocation

Dynamic resource allocation (DRA) problems are an important class of dynamic stochastic optimization problems that arise in a variety of important real-world applications. DRA problems are notoriously difficult to solve to optimality since they frequently combine stochastic elements with intractably large state and action spaces. Although the artificial intelligence and operations research communities have independently proposed two successful frameworks for solving dynamic stochastic optimization problems---Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) and mathematical optimization (MO), respectively---the relative merits of these two approaches are not well understood. In this paper, we adapt both MCTS and MO to a problem inspired by tactical wildfire and management and undertake an extensive computational study comparing the two methods on large scale instances in terms of both the state and the action spaces. We show that both methods are able to greatly improve on a baseline, problem-specific heuristic. On smaller instances, the MCTS and MO approaches perform comparably, but the MO approach outperforms MCTS as the size of the problem increases for a fixed computational budget.