BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Vektor Dewanto

Vektor Dewanto contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningArtificial Intelligenceeess.SYSystems and ControlRobotics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A nearly Blackwell-optimal policy gradient method

For continuing environments, reinforcement learning (RL) methods commonly maximize the discounted reward criterion with discount factor close to 1 in order to approximate the average reward (the gain). However, such a criterion only considers the long-run steady-state performance, ignoring the transient behaviour in transient states. In this work, we develop a policy gradient method that optimizes the gain, then the bias (which indicates the transient performance and is important to capably select from policies with equal gain). We derive expressions that enable sampling for the gradient of the bias and its preconditioning Fisher matrix. We further devise an algorithm that solves the gain-then-bias (bi-level) optimization. Its key ingredient is an RL-specific logarithmic barrier function. Experimental results provide insights into the fundamental mechanisms of our proposal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Approximate discounting-free policy evaluation from transient and recurrent states

In order to distinguish policies that prescribe good from bad actions in transient states, we need to evaluate the so-called bias of a policy from transient states. However, we observe that most (if not all) works in approximate discounting-free policy evaluation thus far are developed for estimating the bias solely from recurrent states. We therefore propose a system of approximators for the bias (specifically, its relative value) from transient and recurrent states. Its key ingredient is a seminorm LSTD (least-squares temporal difference), for which we derive its minimizer expression that enables approximation by sampling required in model-free reinforcement learning. This seminorm LSTD also facilitates the formulation of a general unifying procedure for LSTD-based policy value approximators. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our proposed method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Examining average and discounted reward optimality criteria in reinforcement learning

In reinforcement learning (RL), the goal is to obtain an optimal policy, for which the optimality criterion is fundamentally important. Two major optimality criteria are average and discounted rewards. While the latter is more popular, it is problematic to apply in environments without an inherent notion of discounting. This motivates us to revisit a) the progression of optimality criteria in dynamic programming, b) justification for and complication of an artificial discount factor, and c) benefits of directly maximizing the average reward criterion, which is discounting-free. Our contributions include a thorough examination of the relationship between average and discounted rewards, as well as a discussion of their pros and cons in RL. We emphasize that average-reward RL methods possess the ingredient and mechanism for applying a family of discounting-free optimality criteria (Veinott, 1969) to RL.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access