Source author record

Valentas Kurauskas

Valentas Kurauskas appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Rearrangements of distributions on integers that minimize variance

Which permutations of a probability distribution on integers minimize variance? Let $X$ be a random variable on a set of integers $\{x_1, \dots, x_N\}$ such that $\mathbb{P}(X_i = x_i) = p_i$, $i \in \{1,\dots,N\}$. Let $(p^{(1)}, \dots, p^{(N)})$ be the sequence $(p_1, \dots, p_N)$ ordered non-increasingly. Let $X^+$ be the random variable defined by $\mathbb{P}(X^+=0)=p^{(1)}$, $\mathbb{P}(X^+=1) = p^{(2)}$, $\mathbb{P}(X^+=-1)=p^{(3)}, \dots, \mathbb{P}(X^+=(-1)^N \lfloor \frac {N} 2 \rfloor)=p^{(N)}$. In this short note we generalize and prove the inequality $\mathrm{Var}\, X^+ \le \mathrm{Var}\, X$.

preprint2020arXiv

On Littlewood-Offord theory for arbitrary distributions

Let $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ be independent identically distributed random vectors in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We consider upper bounds on $\max_x \mathbb{P}(a_1X_1+\cdots+a_nX_n=x)$ under various restrictions on $X_i$ and the weights $a_i$. When $\mathbb{P}(X_i=\pm 1) = \frac {1} {2}$, this corresponds to the classical Littlewood-Offord problem. We prove that in general for identically distributed random vectors and even values of $n$ the optimal choice for $(a_i)$ is $a_i=1$ for $i\leq \frac{n}{2}$ and $a_i=-1$ for $i > \frac {n} 2$, regardless of the distribution of $X_1$. Applying these results for Bernoulli random variables answers a recent question of Fox, Kwan and Sauermann. Finally, we provide sharp bounds for concentration probabilities of sums of random vectors under the condition $\sup_{x}\mathbb{P}(X_i=x)\leq α$, where it turns out that the worst case scenario is provided by distributions on an arithmetic progression that are in some sense as close to the uniform distribution as possible. An important feature of this work is that unlike much of the literature on the subject we use neither methods of harmonic analysis nor those from extremal combinatorics.

preprint2013arXiv

Clustering function: a measure of social influence

A commonly used characteristic of statistical dependence of adjacency relations in real networks, the clustering coefficient, evaluates chances that two neighbours of a given vertex are adjacent. An extension is obtained by considering conditional probabilities that two randomly chosen vertices are adjacent given that they have r common neighbours. We denote such probabilities cl(r) and call r-> cl(r) the clustering function. We compare clustering functions of several networks having non-negligible clustering coefficient. They show similar patterns and surprising regularity. We establish a first order asymptotic (as the number of vertices tends to infinity) of the clustering function of related random intersection graph models admitting nonvanishing clustering coefficient and asymptotic degree distribution having a finite second moment.

preprint2010arXiv

Random graphs with few disjoint cycles

The classical Erdős-Pósa theorem states that for each positive integer k there is an f(k) such that, in each graph G which does not have k+1 disjoint cycles, there is a blocker of size at most f(k); that is, a set B of at most f(k) vertices such that G-B has no cycles. We show that, amongst all such graphs on vertex set {1,..,n}, all but an exponentially small proportion have a blocker of size k. We also give further properties of a random graph sampled uniformly from this class; concerning uniqueness of the blocker, connectivity, chromatic number and clique number. A key step in the proof of the main theorem is to show that there must be a blocker as in the Erdős-Pósa theorem with the extra `redundancy' property that B-v is still a blocker for all but at most k vertices v in B.