Researcher profile

Tomas Juškevičius

Tomas Juškevičius contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

The sharp form of the Kolmogorov--Rogozin inequality and a conjecture of Leader--Radcliffe

Let $X$ be a random variable and define its concentration function by $$\mathcal{Q}_{h}(X)=\sup_{x\in \mathbb{R}}\mathbb{P}(X\in (x,x+h]).$$ For a sum $S_n=X_1+\cdots+X_n$ of independent real-valued random variables the Kolmogorov-Rogozin inequality states that $$\mathcal{Q}_{h}(S_n)\leq C\left(\sum_{i=1}^{n}(1-\mathcal{Q}_{h}(X_i))\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}.$$ In this paper we give an optimal bound for $\mathcal{Q}_{h}(S_n)$ in terms of $\mathcal{Q}_{h}(X_i)$, which settles a question posed by Leader and Radcliffe in 1994. Moreover, we show that the extremal distributions are mixtures of two uniform distributions each lying on an arithmetic progression.

preprint2020arXiv

Cosine polynomials with few zeros

In a celebrated paper, Borwein, Erdélyi, Ferguson and Lockhart constructed cosine polynomials of the form \[ f_A(x) = \sum_{a \in A} \cos(ax), \] with $A\subseteq \mathbb{N}$, $|A|= n$ and as few as $n^{5/6+o(1)}$ zeros in $[0,2π]$, thereby disproving an old conjecture of J.E. Littlewood. Here we give a sharp analysis of their constructions and, as a result, prove that there exist examples with as few as $C(n\log n)^{2/3}$ roots.

preprint2020arXiv

On Littlewood-Offord theory for arbitrary distributions

Let $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ be independent identically distributed random vectors in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We consider upper bounds on $\max_x \mathbb{P}(a_1X_1+\cdots+a_nX_n=x)$ under various restrictions on $X_i$ and the weights $a_i$. When $\mathbb{P}(X_i=\pm 1) = \frac {1} {2}$, this corresponds to the classical Littlewood-Offord problem. We prove that in general for identically distributed random vectors and even values of $n$ the optimal choice for $(a_i)$ is $a_i=1$ for $i\leq \frac{n}{2}$ and $a_i=-1$ for $i > \frac {n} 2$, regardless of the distribution of $X_1$. Applying these results for Bernoulli random variables answers a recent question of Fox, Kwan and Sauermann. Finally, we provide sharp bounds for concentration probabilities of sums of random vectors under the condition $\sup_{x}\mathbb{P}(X_i=x)\leq α$, where it turns out that the worst case scenario is provided by distributions on an arithmetic progression that are in some sense as close to the uniform distribution as possible. An important feature of this work is that unlike much of the literature on the subject we use neither methods of harmonic analysis nor those from extremal combinatorics.