BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Trevor J. Ponman

Trevor J. Ponman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAastro-phastro-ph.HE

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Ultimate age-dating method for galaxy groups; clues from the Millennium Simulations

There have been a number of studies dedicated to identification of fossil galaxy groups, arguably groups with a relatively old formation epoch. Most of such studies identify fossil groups, primarily based on a large luminosity gap, which is the magnitude gap between the two most luminous galaxies in the group. Studies of these types of groups in the millennium cosmological simulations show that, although they have accumulated a significant fraction of their mass, relatively earlier than groups with a small luminosity gap, this parameter alone is not highly efficient in fully discriminating between the "old" and "young" galaxy groups, a label assigned based on halo mass accumulation history. We study galaxies drawn from the semi-analytic models of Guo et al. (2011), based on the Millennium Simulation. We establish a set of four observationally measurable parameters which can be used in combination, to identify a subset of galaxy groups which are old, with a very high probability. We thus argue that a sample of fossil groups selected based on luminosity gap will result in a contaminated sample of old galaxy groups. By adding constraints on the luminosity of the brightest galaxy, and its offset from the group luminosity centroid, we can considerably improve the age-dating.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Gas expulsion by quasar-driven winds as a solution to the over-cooling problem in galaxy groups and clusters

Galaxy groups are not scaled down versions of massive galaxy clusters - the hot gas in groups (known as the intragroup medium, IGrM for short) is, on average, less dense than the intracluster medium, implying that one or more non-gravitational processes (e.g., radiative cooling, star formation, and/or feedback) has had a relatively larger effect on groups. In the present study, we compare a number of cosmological hydrodynamic simulations that form part of the OverWhelmingly Large Simulations project to isolate and quantify the effects of cooling and feedback from supernovae (SNe) and active galactic nuclei (AGN) on the gas. This is achieved by comparing Lagrangian thermal histories of the gas in the different runs, which were all started from identical initial conditions. While radiative cooling, star formation, and SN feedback are all necessary ingredients, only runs that also include AGN feedback are able to successfully reproduce the optical and X-ray properties of groups and low-mass clusters. We isolate how, when, and exactly what gas is heated by AGN. Interestingly, we find that the gas that constitutes the present-day IGrM is that which was not strongly heated by AGN. Instead, the low median density/high median entropy of the gas in present-day groups is achieved by the ejection of lower entropy gas from low-mass progenitor galaxies at high redshift (primarily 2 < z < 4). This corresponds to the epoch when supermassive black holes accreted most of their mass, typically at a rate that is close to the Eddington limit (i.e., when the black holes are in a `quasar mode&#39;).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

The case for AGN feedback in galaxy groups

[Abridged] The relatively recent insight that energy input from supermassive black holes (BHs) can have a substantial effect on the star formation rates (SFRs) of galaxies motivates us to examine its effects on the scale of galaxy groups. At present, groups contain most of the galaxies and a significant fraction of the overall baryon content of the universe. To explore the effects of BH feedback on groups, we analyse two high resolution cosmological hydro simulations from the OverWhelmingly Large Simulations project. While both include galactic winds driven by supernovae, only one includes feedback from BHs. We compare the properties of the simulated groups to a wide range of observational data, including hot gas radial profiles and gas mass fractions (fgas), luminosity-mass-temperature (L-M-T) scaling relations, K-band luminosity of the group and its central brightest galaxy (CBG), SFRs and ages of the CBG, and gas/stellar metallicities. Both runs yield entropy profiles similar to the data, while the run without AGN feedback yields highly peaked temperature profiles, in discord with the observations. Energy input from BHs significantly reduces fgas for groups with masses less than ~10^14 Msun, yielding fgas-T and L-T relations that are in agreement with the data. The run without AGN feedback suffers from the well known overcooling problem; the resulting K-band luminosities are much larger than observed. By contrast, the run that includes BH feedback yields K-band luminosities and CBG SFRs and ages in agreement with current estimates. Both runs yield very similar gas-phase metallicities that match X-ray data, but they predict very different stellar metallicities. Based on the above, galaxy groups provide a compelling case that BH feedback is a crucial ingredient in the formation of massive galaxies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2006arXiv

Differences in the AGN Populations of Groups and Clusters: Clues to AGN Evolution

We combine optical and X-ray data for eight low redshift ($z\sim 0.06$) poor groups of galaxies from the {\it XI}({\it XMM/IMACS}) Groups Project to study the AGN population in the group environment. Among $\sim 140$ group members, we identify five AGN based on their optical emission lines. None of these optically-selected AGN are detected by {\it XMM-Newton}. One additional AGN is discovered in the {\it XMM-Newton} observations. This X-ray detected AGN, which has no obvious AGN emission line signatures in its optical spectrum, is a member of the only X-ray luminous group in our sample. The lack of a significant population of X-ray bright, but optically dull AGN among less dynamically evolved groups is in stark contrast to the large fraction of such objects in rich clusters of galaxies (Martini et al. 2006). We suggest this result can be explained by a physical scenario for AGN accretion evolution: AGN activity is initially triggered by galaxy merging, leading to a high accretion rate and an optically dominant phase (via thin disk accretion). As the accretion rate drops in time, the AGN gradually enters an X-ray dominant low-accretion phase (via a radiative inefficient accretion flow). In this picture, optical- and X-ray-selected AGN are the same population of supermassive black holes observed at different epochs. Within the context of this scenario, the majority of AGN in poor groups are in the high-accretion optically dominant phase, while the AGN population in rich clusters is mostly in the low-accretion X-ray dominant phase.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access