Paper detail

Differences in the AGN Populations of Groups and Clusters: Clues to AGN Evolution

We combine optical and X-ray data for eight low redshift ($z\sim 0.06$) poor groups of galaxies from the {\it XI}({\it XMM/IMACS}) Groups Project to study the AGN population in the group environment. Among $\sim 140$ group members, we identify five AGN based on their optical emission lines. None of these optically-selected AGN are detected by {\it XMM-Newton}. One additional AGN is discovered in the {\it XMM-Newton} observations. This X-ray detected AGN, which has no obvious AGN emission line signatures in its optical spectrum, is a member of the only X-ray luminous group in our sample. The lack of a significant population of X-ray bright, but optically dull AGN among less dynamically evolved groups is in stark contrast to the large fraction of such objects in rich clusters of galaxies (Martini et al. 2006). We suggest this result can be explained by a physical scenario for AGN accretion evolution: AGN activity is initially triggered by galaxy merging, leading to a high accretion rate and an optically dominant phase (via thin disk accretion). As the accretion rate drops in time, the AGN gradually enters an X-ray dominant low-accretion phase (via a radiative inefficient accretion flow). In this picture, optical- and X-ray-selected AGN are the same population of supermassive black holes observed at different epochs. Within the context of this scenario, the majority of AGN in poor groups are in the high-accretion optically dominant phase, while the AGN population in rich clusters is mostly in the low-accretion X-ray dominant phase.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.