Paper detail

The case for AGN feedback in galaxy groups

[Abridged] The relatively recent insight that energy input from supermassive black holes (BHs) can have a substantial effect on the star formation rates (SFRs) of galaxies motivates us to examine its effects on the scale of galaxy groups. At present, groups contain most of the galaxies and a significant fraction of the overall baryon content of the universe. To explore the effects of BH feedback on groups, we analyse two high resolution cosmological hydro simulations from the OverWhelmingly Large Simulations project. While both include galactic winds driven by supernovae, only one includes feedback from BHs. We compare the properties of the simulated groups to a wide range of observational data, including hot gas radial profiles and gas mass fractions (fgas), luminosity-mass-temperature (L-M-T) scaling relations, K-band luminosity of the group and its central brightest galaxy (CBG), SFRs and ages of the CBG, and gas/stellar metallicities. Both runs yield entropy profiles similar to the data, while the run without AGN feedback yields highly peaked temperature profiles, in discord with the observations. Energy input from BHs significantly reduces fgas for groups with masses less than ~10^14 Msun, yielding fgas-T and L-T relations that are in agreement with the data. The run without AGN feedback suffers from the well known overcooling problem; the resulting K-band luminosities are much larger than observed. By contrast, the run that includes BH feedback yields K-band luminosities and CBG SFRs and ages in agreement with current estimates. Both runs yield very similar gas-phase metallicities that match X-ray data, but they predict very different stellar metallicities. Based on the above, galaxy groups provide a compelling case that BH feedback is a crucial ingredient in the formation of massive galaxies.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.