Source author record

Tony Nogueira

Tony Nogueira appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Optimal constants for a mixed Littlewood type inequality

For $p\in\lbrack2,\infty]$ a mixed Littlewood-type inequality asserts that there is a constant $C_{(m),p}\geq1$ such that \[ \left( \sum_{i_{1}=1}^{\infty}\left( \sum_{i_{2},...,i_{m}=1}^{\infty }|T(e_{i_{1}},...,e_{i_{m}})|^{2}\right) ^{\frac{1}{2}\frac{p}{p-1}}\right) ^{\frac{p-1}{p}}\leq C_{(m),p}\Vert T\Vert \] for all continuous real-valued $m$-linear forms on $\ell_{p}\times c_{0} \times\dots\times c_{0}$ (when $p=\infty$, $\ell_{p}$ is replaced by $c_{0})$. We prove that for $p>2.18006$ the optimal constants $C_{(m),p}$ are $\left( 2^{\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{p}}\right) ^{m-1}.$ When $p=\infty,$ we recover the best constants of the mixed $\left( \ell_{1},\ell_{2}\right) $-Littlewood inequality.

preprint2016arXiv

Summability of multilinear forms on classical sequence spaces

We present an extension of the Hardy--Littlewood inequality for multilinear forms. More precisely, let $\mathbb{K}$ be the real or complex scalar field and $m,k$ be positive integers with $m\geq k\,$ and $n_{1},\dots ,n_{k}$ be positive integers such that $n_{1}+\cdots +n_{k}=m$. ($a$) If $(r,p)\in (0,\infty )\times \lbrack 2m,\infty ]$ then there is a constant $D_{m,r,p,k}^{\mathbb{K}}\geq 1$ (not depending on $n$) such that $$ \left( \sum_{i_{1},\dots ,i_{k}=1}^{n}\left| T\left( e_{i_{1}}^{n_{1}},\dots ,e_{i_{k}}^{n_{k}}\right) \right| ^{r}\right) ^{% \frac{1}{r}}\leq D_{m,r,p,k}^{\mathbb{K}} \cdot n^{max\left\{ \frac{% 2kp-kpr-pr+2rm}{2pr},0\right\} }\left| T\right| $$ for all $m$-linear forms $T:\ell_{p}^{n}\times \cdots \times \ell_{p}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{K}$ and all positive integers $n$. Moreover, the exponent $max\left\{ \frac{2kp-kpr-pr+2rm}{2pr},0\right\} $ is optimal. ($b$) If $(r, p) \in (0, \infty) \times (m, 2m]$ then there is a constant $% D_{m,r,p, k}^{\mathbb{K}}\geq 1$ (not depending on $n$) such that $$ \left( \sum_{i_{1},\dots ,i_{k}=1}^{n }\left| T\left( e_{i_{1}}^{n_{1}},\dots ,e_{i_{k}}^{n_{k}}\right) \right| ^{r }\right) ^{% \frac{1}{r }}\leq D_{m,r,p, k}^{\mathbb{K}} \cdot n^{ max \left\{\frac{% p-rp+rm}{pr}, 0\right\}}\left| T\right| $$ for all $m$-linear forms $T:\ell_{p}^{n}\times \cdots \times \ell_{p}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{K}$ and all positive integers $n$. Moreover, the exponent $max \left\{\frac{p-rp+rm}{pr}, 0\right\}$ is optimal. The case $k=m$ recovers a recent result due to G. Araujo and D. Pellegrino.