Source author record

Tony Nogueira

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

4 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Optimal constants for a mixed Littlewood type inequality

For p∈[2,∞]p\in\lbrack2,\infty] a mixed Littlewood-type inequality asserts that there is a constant C(m),p≥1C_{(m),p}\geq1 such that (∑i1=1∞(∑i2,...,im=1∞∣T(ei1,...,eim)∣2)12pp−1)p−1p≤C(m),p∥T∥ \left( \sum_{i_{1}=1}^{\infty}\left( \sum_{i_{2},...,i_{m}=1}^{\infty }|T(e_{i_{1}},...,e_{i_{m}})|^{2}\right) ^{\frac{1}{2}\frac{p}{p-1}}\right) ^{\frac{p-1}{p}}\leq C_{(m),p}\Vert T\Vert for all continuous real-valued mm-linear forms on ℓp×c0×⋯×c0\ell_{p}\times c_{0} \times\dots\times c_{0} (when p=∞p=\infty, ℓp\ell_{p} is replaced by c0)c_{0}). We prove that for p>2.18006p>2.18006 the optimal constants C(m),pC_{(m),p} are (212−1p)m−1.\left( 2^{\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{p}}\right) ^{m-1}. When p=∞,p=\infty, we recover the best constants of the mixed (ℓ1,ℓ2)\left( \ell_{1},\ell_{2}\right) -Littlewood inequality.

preprint2016arXiv

Summability of multilinear forms on classical sequence spaces

We present an extension of the Hardy--Littlewood inequality for multilinear forms. More precisely, let K\mathbb{K} be the real or complex scalar field and m,km,k be positive integers with m≥k m\geq k\, and n1,…,nkn_{1},\dots ,n_{k} be positive integers such that n1+⋯+nk=mn_{1}+\cdots +n_{k}=m. (aa) If (r,p)∈(0,∞)×[2m,∞](r,p)\in (0,\infty )\times \lbrack 2m,\infty ] then there is a constant Dm,r,p,kK≥1D_{m,r,p,k}^{\mathbb{K}}\geq 1 (not depending on nn) such that $$ \left( \sum_{i_{1},\dots ,i_{k}=1}^{n}\left| T\left( e_{i_{1}}^{n_{1}},\dots ,e_{i_{k}}^{n_{k}}\right) \right| ^{r}\right) ^{% \frac{1}{r}}\leq D_{m,r,p,k}^{\mathbb{K}} \cdot n^{max\left\{ \frac{% 2kp-kpr-pr+2rm}{2pr},0\right\} }\left| T\right| $$ for all mm-linear forms T:ℓpn×⋯×ℓpn→KT:\ell_{p}^{n}\times \cdots \times \ell_{p}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{K} and all positive integers nn. Moreover, the exponent max{2kp−kpr−pr+2rm2pr,0}max\left\{ \frac{2kp-kpr-pr+2rm}{2pr},0\right\} is optimal. (bb) If (r,p)∈(0,∞)×(m,2m](r, p) \in (0, \infty) \times (m, 2m] then there is a constant % D_{m,r,p, k}^{\mathbb{K}}\geq 1 (not depending on nn) such that $$ \left( \sum_{i_{1},\dots ,i_{k}=1}^{n }\left| T\left( e_{i_{1}}^{n_{1}},\dots ,e_{i_{k}}^{n_{k}}\right) \right| ^{r }\right) ^{% \frac{1}{r }}\leq D_{m,r,p, k}^{\mathbb{K}} \cdot n^{ max \left\{\frac{% p-rp+rm}{pr}, 0\right\}}\left| T\right| $$ for all mm-linear forms T:ℓpn×⋯×ℓpn→KT:\ell_{p}^{n}\times \cdots \times \ell_{p}^{n}\rightarrow \mathbb{K} and all positive integers nn. Moreover, the exponent max{p−rp+rmpr,0}max \left\{\frac{p-rp+rm}{pr}, 0\right\} is optimal. The case k=mk=m recovers a recent result due to G. Araujo and D. Pellegrino.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.