BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Tjarda Boekholt

Tjarda Boekholt appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
astro-ph.IMastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRnlin.CDphysics.comp-phComputational Complexitygr-qcMachine Learningphysics.space-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

The paradox of infinitesimal granularity: Chaos and the reversibility of time in Newton's theory of gravity

The fundamental laws of physics are time-symmetric, but our macroscopic experience contradicts this. The time reversibility paradox is partly a consequence of the unpredictability of Newton's equations of motion. We measure the dependence of the fraction of irreversible, gravitational N-body systems on numerical precision and find that it scales as a power law. The stochastic wave packet reduction postulate then introduces fundamental uncertainties in the Cartesian phase space coordinates that propagate through classical three-body dynamics to macroscopic scales within the triple's lifetime. The spontaneous collapse of the wave function then drives the global chaotic behavior of the Universe through the superposition of triple systems (and probably multi-body systems). The paradox of infinitesimal granularity then arises from the superposition principle, which states that any multi-body system is composed of an ensemble of three-body problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Gargantuan chaotic gravitational three-body systems and their irreversibility to the Planck length

Chaos is present in most stellar dynamical systems and manifests itself through the exponential growth of small perturbations. Exponential divergence drives time irreversibility and increases the entropy in the system. A numerical consequence is that integrations of the N-body problem unavoidably magnify truncation and rounding errors to macroscopic scales. Hitherto, a quantitative relation between chaos in stellar dynamical systems and the level of irreversibility remained undetermined. In this work we study chaotic three-body systems in free fall initially using the accurate and precise N-body code Brutus, which goes beyond standard double-precision arithmetic. We demonstrate that the fraction of irreversible solutions decreases as a power law with numerical accuracy. This can be derived from the distribution of amplification factors of small initial perturbations. Applying this result to systems consisting of three massive black holes with zero total angular momentum, we conclude that up to five percent of such triples would require an accuracy of smaller than the Planck length in order to produce a time-reversible solution, thus rendering them fundamentally unpredictable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Newton vs the machine: solving the chaotic three-body problem using deep neural networks

Since its formulation by Sir Isaac Newton, the problem of solving the equations of motion for three bodies under their own gravitational force has remained practically unsolved. Currently, the solution for a given initialization can only be found by performing laborious iterative calculations that have unpredictable and potentially infinite computational cost, due to the system's chaotic nature. We show that an ensemble of solutions obtained using an arbitrarily precise numerical integrator can be used to train a deep artificial neural network (ANN) that, over a bounded time interval, provides accurate solutions at fixed computational cost and up to 100 million times faster than a state-of-the-art solver. Our results provide evidence that, for computationally challenging regions of phase-space, a trained ANN can replace existing numerical solvers, enabling fast and scalable simulations of many-body systems to shed light on outstanding phenomena such as the formation of black-hole binary systems or the origin of the core collapse in dense star clusters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On the minimal accuracy required for simulating self-gravitating systems by means of direct N-body methods

The conservation of energy, linear momentum and angular momentum are important drivers for our physical understanding of the evolution of the Universe. These quantities are also conserved in Newton's laws of motion under gravity \citep{Newton:1687}. Numerical integration of the associated equations of motion is extremely challenging, in particular due to the steady growth of numerical errors (by round-off and discrete time-stepping, \cite{1981PAZh....7..752B,1993ApJ...415..715G,1993ApJ...402L..85H,1994LNP...430..131M}) and the exponential divergence \citep{1964ApJ...140..250M,2009MNRAS.392.1051U} between two nearby solution. As a result, numerical solutions to the general N-body problem are intrinsically questionable \citep{2003gmbp.book.....H,1994JAM....61..226L}. Using brute force integrations to arbitrary numerical precision we demonstrate empirically that ensembles of different realizations of resonant 3-body interactions produce statistically indistinguishable results. Although individual solutions using common integration methods are notoriously unreliable, we conjecture that an ensemble of approximate 3-body solutions accurately represents an ensemble of true solutions, so long as the energy during integration is conserved to better than 1/10. We therefore provide an independent confirmation that previous work on self-gravitating systems can actually be trusted, irrespective of the intrinsic chaotic nature of the N-body problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On the Reliability of N-body Simulations

The general consensus in the N-body community is that statistical results of an ensemble of collisional N-body simulations are accurate, even though individual simulations are not. A way to test this hypothesis is to make a direct comparison of an ensemble of solutions obtained by conventional methods with an ensemble of true solutions. In order to make this possible, we wrote an N-body code called Brutus, that uses arbitrary-precision arithmetic. In combination with the Bulirsch--Stoer method, Brutus is able to obtain converged solutions, which are true up to a specified number of digits. We perform simulations of democratic 3-body systems, where after a sequence of resonances and ejections, a final configuration is reached consisting of a permanent binary and an escaping star. We do this with conventional double-precision methods, and with Brutus; both have the same set of initial conditions and initial realisations. The ensemble of solutions from the conventional simulations is compared directly to that of the converged simulations, both as an ensemble and on an individual basis to determine the distribution of the errors. We find that on average at least half of the conventional simulations diverge from the converged solution, such that the two solutions are microscopically incomparable. For the solutions which have not diverged significantly, we observe that if the integrator has a bias in energy and angular momentum, this propagates to a bias in the statistical properties of the binaries. In the case when the conventional solution has diverged onto an entirely different trajectory in phase-space, we find that the errors are centred around zero and symmetric; the error due to divergence is unbiased, as long as the time-step parameter, eta <= 2^(-5) and when simulations which violate energy conservation by more than 10% are excluded.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access