BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Tiziano Squartini

Tiziano Squartini contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.soc-phecon.GNphysics.data-anq-fin.ECSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

The hidden structure of innovation networks

Innovation emerges from complex collaboration patterns - among inventors, firms, or institutions. However, not much is known about the overall mesoscopic structure around which inventive activity self-organizes. Here, we tackle this problem by employing patent data to analyze both individual (co-inventorship) and organization (co-ownership) networks in three strategic domains (artificial intelligence, biotechnology and semiconductors). We characterize the mesoscale structure (in terms of clusters) of each domain by comparing two alternative methods: a standard baseline - modularity maximization - and one based on the minimization of the Bayesian Information Criterion, within the Stochastic Block Model and its degree-corrected variant. We find that, across sectors, inventor networks are denser and more clustered than organization ones - consistent with the presence of small recurrent teams embedded into broader institutional hierarchies - whereas organization networks have neater hierarchical role-based structures, with few bridging firms coordinating the most peripheral ones. We also find that the discovered meso-structures are connected to innovation output. In particular, Lorenz curves of forward citations show a pervasive inequality in technological influence: across sectors and methods, both inventor (especially) and organization networks consistently show high levels of concentration of citations in a few of the discovered clusters. Our results demonstrate that the baseline modularity-based method may not be capable of fully capturing the way collaborations drive the spreading of inventive impact across technological domains. This is due to the presence of local hierarchies that call for more refined tools based on Bayesian inference.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Weighted Bitcoin Lightning Network

The Bitcoin Lightning Network (BLN) was launched in 2018 to scale up the number of transactions between Bitcoin owners. Although several contributions concerning the analysis of the BLN binary structure have recently appeared in the literature, the properties of its weighted counterpart are still largely unknown. The present contribution aims at filling this gap, by considering the Bitcoin Lightning Network over a period of 18 months, ranging from 12th January 2018 to 17th July 2019, and focusing on its weighted, undirected, daily snapshot representation. As the study of the BLN weighted structural properties reveals, it is becoming increasingly 'centralised' at different levels, just as its binary counterpart: 1) the Nakamoto coefficient shows that the percentage of nodes whose degrees/strengths 'enclose' the 51% of the total number of links/total weight is rapidly decreasing; 2) the Gini coefficient confirms that several weighted centrality measures are becoming increasingly unevenly distributed; 3)the weighted BLN topology is becoming increasingly compatible with a core-periphery structure, with the largest nodes 'by strength' constituting the core of such a network, whose size keeps shrinking as the BLN evolves. Further inspection of the resilience of the weighted BLN shows that removing such hubs leads to the network fragmentation into many components, an evidence indicating potential security threats - as the ones represented by the so called 'split attacks'.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Detecting mesoscale structures by surprise

The importance of identifying the presence of mesoscale structures in complex networks can be hardly overestimated. So far, much attention has been devoted to the detection of communities, bipartite and core-periphery structures on binary networks: such an effort has led to the definition of a unified framework based upon the score function called surprise, i.e. a p-value that can be assigned to any given partition of nodes, on both undirected and directed networks. Here, we aim at making a step further, by extending the entire framework to the weighted case: after reviewing the application of the surprise-based formalism to the detection of binary mesoscale structures, we present a suitable generalization of it for detecting weighted mesoscale structures, a topic that has received much less attention. To this aim, we analyze four variants of the surprise; from a technical point of view, this amounts at employing four variants of the hypergeometric distribution: the binomial one for the detection of binary communities, the multinomial one for the detection of binary "bimodular" structures and their negative counterparts for the detection of communities and "bimodular" structures on weighted networks. On top of that, we define two "enhanced" variants of surprise, able to encode both binary and weighted constraints and whose definition rests upon two suitable generalizations of the hypergeometric distribution itself. As a result, we present a general, statistically-grounded approach to detect mesoscale structures on networks via a unified, suprise-based framework. To illustrate the performance of our methods, we, first, test them on a variety of well-established, synthetic benchmarks and, then, apply them to several real-world networks, i.e. social, economic, financial and ecological ones. Moreover, we attach to the paper a Python code implementing all the considered variants of surprise.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A faster horse on a safer trail: generalized inference for the efficient reconstruction of weighted networks

Due to the interconnectedness of financial entities, estimating certain key properties of a complex financial system (e.g. the implied level of systemic risk) requires detailed information about the structure of the underlying network. However, since data about financial linkages are typically subject to confidentiality, network reconstruction techniques become necessary to infer both the presence of connections and their intensity. Recently, several "horse races" have been conducted to compare the performance of the available financial network reconstruction methods. These comparisons, however, were based on arbitrarily-chosen similarity metrics between the real and the reconstructed network. Here we establish a generalised maximum-likelihood approach to rigorously define and compare weighted reconstruction methods. Our generalization maximizes the conditional entropy to solve the problem represented by the fact that the density-dependent constraints required to reliably reconstruct the network are typically unobserved. The resulting approach admits as input any reconstruction method for the purely binary topology and, conditionally on the latter, exploits the available partial information to infer link weights. We find that the most reliable method is obtained by "dressing" the best-performing binary method with an exponential distribution of link weights having a properly density-corrected and link-specific mean value and propose two unbiased (in the sense of maximum conditional entropy) variants of it. While the one named CReMA is perfectly general (as a particular case, it can place optimal weights on a network whose topology is known), the one named CReMB is recommended both in case of full uncertainty about the network topology and if the existence of some links is certain. In these cases, the CReMB is faster and reproduces empirical networks with highest generalised likelihood.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Lightning Network: a second path towards centralisation of the Bitcoin economy

The Bitcoin Lightning Network (BLN), a so-called "second layer" payment protocol, was launched in 2018 to scale up the number of transactions between Bitcoin owners. In this paper, we analyse the structure of the BLN over a period of 18 months, ranging from 12th January 2018 to 17th July 2019. Here, we consider three representations of the BLN: the daily snapshot one, the weekly snapshot one and the daily-block snapshot one. By studying the topological properties of the three representations above, we find that the total volume of transacted bitcoins approximately grows as the square of the network size; however, despite the huge activity characterising the BLN, the bitcoins distribution is very unequal: the average Gini coefficient of the node strengths (computed across the entire history of the Bitcoin Lightning Network) is, in fact, ~0.88 causing the 10% (50%) of the nodes to hold the 80% (99%) of the bitcoins at stake in the BLN (on average, across the entire period). This concentration brings up the question of which minimalist network model allows us to explain the network topological structure. Like for other economic systems, we hypothesise that local properties of nodes, like the degree, ultimately determine part of its characteristics. Therefore, we have tested the goodness of the Undirected Binary Configuration Model (UBCM) in reproducing the structural features of the BLN: the UBCM recovers the disassortative and the hierarchical character of the BLN but underestimates the centrality of nodes; this suggests that the BLN is becoming an increasingly centralised network, more and more compatible with a core-periphery structure. Further inspection of the resilience of the BLN shows that removing hubs leads to the collapse of the network into many components, an evidence suggesting that this network may be a target for the so-called split attacks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access