The geometry of generalized Lame equation, III: One-to-one of the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence
In this paper, the third in a series, we continue to study the generalized Lamé equation H(n0,n1,n2,n3;B) with the Darboux-Treibich-Verdier potential \begin{equation*} y^{\prime \prime }(z)=\bigg[ \sum_{k=0}^{3}n_{k}(n_{k}+1)\wp(z+\tfrac{ ω_{k}}{2}|τ)+B\bigg] y(z),\quad n_{k}\in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq0} \end{equation*} and a related linear ODE with additional singularities ±p from the monodromy aspect.We establish the uniqueness of these ODEs with respect to the global monodromy data. Surprisingly, our result shows that the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence from the set {H(n0,n1,n2,n3;B)∣B∈C}∪{H(n0+2,n1,n2,n3;B)∣B∈C} to the set of group representations ρ:π1(Eτ)→SL(2,C) is one-to-one. We emphasize that this result is not trivial at all. There is an example that for τ=21+i23, there are B1,B2 such that the monodromy representations of H(1,0,0,0;B1) and H(4,0,0,0;B2) are {\bf the same}, namely the Riemann-Hilbert correspondence from the set {H(n0,n1,n2,n3;B)∣B∈C}∪{H(n0+3,n1,n2,n3;B)∣B∈C} to the set of group representations is {\bf not} necessarily one-to-one. This example shows that our result is completely different from the classical one concerning linear ODEs defined on CP1 with finite singularities.
