Researcher profile

Timothy S. Trudgian

Timothy S. Trudgian contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Wolstenholme and Vandiver primes

A prime $p$ is a Wolstenholme prime if $\binom{2p}{p}\equiv2$ mod $p^4$, or, equivalently, if $p$ divides the numerator of the Bernoulli number $B_{p-3}$; a Vandiver prime $p$ is one that divides the Euler number $E_{p-3}$. Only two Wolstenholme primes and eight Vandiver primes are known. We increase the search range in the first case by a factor of $10$, and show that no additional Wolstenholme primes exist up to $10^{11}$, and in the second case by a factor of $20$, proving that no additional Vandiver primes occur up to this same bound. To facilitate this, we develop a number of new congruences for Bernoulli and Euler numbers mod $p$ that are favorable for computation, and we implement some highly parallel searches using GPUs.

preprint2020arXiv

A tale of two omegas

We consider $ω(n)$ and $Ω(n)$, which respectively count the number of distinct and total prime factors of $n$. We survey a number of similarities and differences between these two functions, and study the summatory functions $L(x)=\sum_{n\leq x} (-1)^{Ω(n)}$ and $H(x)=\sum_{n\leq x} (-1)^{ω(n)}$ in particular. Questions about oscillations in both of these functions are connected to the Riemann hypothesis and other questions concerning the Riemann zeta function. We show that even though $ω(n)$ and $Ω(n)$ have the same parity approximately 73.5\% of the time, these summatory functions exhibit quite different behaviors: $L(x)$ is biased toward negative values, while $H(x)$ is unbiased. We also prove that $H(x)>1.7\sqrt{x}$ for infinitely many integers $x$, and $H(x)<-1.7\sqrt{x}$ infinitely often as well. These statements complement results on oscillations for $L(x)$.

preprint2020arXiv

The size of oscillations in the Goldbach conjecture

Let $R(n) = \sum_{a+b=n} Λ(a)Λ(b)$, where $Λ(\cdot)$ is the von Mangoldt function. The function $R(n)$ is often studied in connection with Goldbach&#39;s conjecture. On the Riemann hypothesis (RH) it is known that $\sum_{n\leq x} R(n) = x^2/2 - 4x^{3/2} G(x) + O(x^{1+ε})$, where $G(x)=\Re \sum_{γ>0} \frac{x^{iγ}}{(\frac{1}{2} + iγ)(\frac{3}{2} + iγ)}$ and the sum is over the ordinates of the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function in the upper half-plane. We prove (on RH) that each of the inequalities $G(x) < -0.02093$ and $G(x)> 0.02092$ hold infinitely often, and establish improved bounds under an assumption of linearly independence for zeros of the zeta function. We also show that the bounds we obtain are very close to optimal.