Abstract

We consider ω(n)ω(n) and Ω(n)Ω(n), which respectively count the number of distinct and total prime factors of nn. We survey a number of similarities and differences between these two functions, and study the summatory functions L(x)=∑n≤x(−1)Ω(n)L(x)=\sum_{n\leq x} (-1)^{Ω(n)} and H(x)=∑n≤x(−1)ω(n)H(x)=\sum_{n\leq x} (-1)^{ω(n)} in particular. Questions about oscillations in both of these functions are connected to the Riemann hypothesis and other questions concerning the Riemann zeta function. We show that even though ω(n)ω(n) and Ω(n)Ω(n) have the same parity approximately 73.5\% of the time, these summatory functions exhibit quite different behaviors: L(x)L(x) is biased toward negative values, while H(x)H(x) is unbiased. We also prove that H(x)>1.7xH(x)>1.7\sqrt{x} for infinitely many integers xx, and H(x)<−1.7xH(x)<-1.7\sqrt{x} infinitely often as well. These statements complement results on oscillations for L(x)L(x).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.