Source author record

Thomas Schramm

Thomas Schramm appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint1997arXiv

A general and practical method for calculating cosmological distances

The calculation of distances is of fundamental importance in extragalactic astronomy and cosmology. However, no practical implementation for the general case has previously been available. We derive a second-order differential equation for the angular size distance valid not only in all em homogeneous Friedmann-Lemaitre cosmological models, parametrised by $λ_{0}$ and $Ω_{0}$, but also in inhomogeneous `on-average' Friedmann-Lemaitre models, where the inhomogeneity is given by the (in the general case redshift-dependent) parameter $η$. Since most other cosmological distances can be obtained trivially from the angular size distance, and since the differential equation can be efficiently solved numerically, this offers for the first time a practical method for calculating distances in a large class of cosmological models. We also briefly discuss our numerical implementation, which is publicly available.

preprint1995arXiv

The light curve and the time delay of QSO 0957+561

We present a new analysis of the presently available photometric data for the gravitationally lensed quasar 0957+561 A,B with the aim of determining the time delay between its two images. The basic method used is the dispersion estimation technique. Even by using the simplest non-parametric form of our method we can convincingly rule out a time delay near 536 days and show that the time delay is in the vicinity of 420 days. We then introduce refinements to our method in order to get a stable and reliable result for the time delay independent of high frequency noise in the data and sampling errors. Our best result for the time delay, checked by various statistical tests and using bootstrap error estimates, is 423 +/- 6 days. We furthermore confirm our earlier result that the radio data are compatible with this value. Using the best available model for the mass distribution in the lensing galaxy and cluster, our result for the time delay constrains the Hubble parameter to be smaller than 70 km/(s Mpc).