Paper detail

The light curve and the time delay of QSO 0957+561

We present a new analysis of the presently available photometric data for the gravitationally lensed quasar 0957+561 A,B with the aim of determining the time delay between its two images. The basic method used is the dispersion estimation technique. Even by using the simplest non-parametric form of our method we can convincingly rule out a time delay near 536 days and show that the time delay is in the vicinity of 420 days. We then introduce refinements to our method in order to get a stable and reliable result for the time delay independent of high frequency noise in the data and sampling errors. Our best result for the time delay, checked by various statistical tests and using bootstrap error estimates, is 423 +/- 6 days. We furthermore confirm our earlier result that the radio data are compatible with this value. Using the best available model for the mass distribution in the lensing galaxy and cluster, our result for the time delay constrains the Hubble parameter to be smaller than 70 km/(s Mpc).

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.