BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Phillip Helbig

Phillip Helbig appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
astro-phastro-ph.COgr-qc

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Calculation of distances in cosmological models with small-scale inhomogeneities and their use in observational cosmology: a review

The Universe is not completely homogeneous. Even if it is sufficiently so on large scales, it is very inhomogeneous at small scales, and this has an effect on light propagation, so that the distance as a function of redshift, which in many cases is defined via light propagation, can differ from the homogeneous case. Simple models can take this into account. I review the history of this idea, its generalization to a wide variety of cosmological models, analytic solutions of simple models, comparison of such solutions with exact solutions and numerical simulations, applications, simpler analytic approximations to the distance equations, and (for all of these aspects) the related concept of a "Swiss-cheese" universe.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The $m$-$z$ relation for type Ia supernovae, locally inhomogeneous cosmological models, and the nature of dark matter

The $m$-$z$ relation for type Ia supernovae is one of the key pieces of evidence supporting the cosmological `concordance model' with $λ_0 \approx 0.7$ and $Ω_0 \approx 0.3$. However, it is well known that the $m$-$z$ relation depends not only on $λ_0$ and $Ω_0$ (with $H_0$ as a scale factor) but also on the density of matter along the line of sight, which is not necessarily the same as the large-scale density. I investigate to what extent the measurement of $λ_0$ and $Ω_0$ depends on this density when it is characterized by the parameter $η$ ($0 \le η\le 1$), which describes the ratio of density along the line of sight to the overall density. I also discuss what constraints can be placed on $η$, both with and without constraints on $λ_0$ and $Ω_0$ in addition to those from the $m$-$z$ relation for type~Ia supernovae.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The $m$-$z$ relation for Type Ia supernovae: safety in numbers or safely without worry?

The $m$-$z$ relation for Type Ia supernovae is compatible with the cosmological concordance model if one assumes that the Universe is homogeneous, at least with respect to light propagation. This could be due to the density along each line of sight being equal to the overall cosmological density, or to `safety in numbers', with variation in the density along all lines of sight averaging out if the sample is large enough. Statistical correlations (or lack thereof) between redshifts, residuals (differences between the observed distance moduli and those calculated from the best-fitting cosmological model), and observational uncertainties suggest that the former scenario is the better description, so that one can use the traditional formula for the luminosity distance safely without worry.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Is there a flatness problem in classical cosmology?

I briefly review the flatness problem within the context of classical cosmology and examine some of the debate in the literature with regard to its definition and even the question whether it exists. I then present some new calculations for cosmological models which will collapse in the future; together with previous work by others for models which will expand forever, this allows one to examine the flatness problem quantitatively for all cosmological models. This leads to the conclusion that the flatness problem does not exist, not only for the cosmological models corresponding to the currently popular values of lambda_0 and Omega_0 but indeed for all Friedmann-Lemaître models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1997arXiv

A general and practical method for calculating cosmological distances

The calculation of distances is of fundamental importance in extragalactic astronomy and cosmology. However, no practical implementation for the general case has previously been available. We derive a second-order differential equation for the angular size distance valid not only in all em homogeneous Friedmann-Lemaitre cosmological models, parametrised by $λ_{0}$ and $Ω_{0}$, but also in inhomogeneous `on-average' Friedmann-Lemaitre models, where the inhomogeneity is given by the (in the general case redshift-dependent) parameter $η$. Since most other cosmological distances can be obtained trivially from the angular size distance, and since the differential equation can be efficiently solved numerically, this offers for the first time a practical method for calculating distances in a large class of cosmological models. We also briefly discuss our numerical implementation, which is publicly available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AND GRAVITATIONAL LENSING STATISTICS

The general idea of determining cosmological parameters with gravitational lensing statistics is outlined, and then recent work---with an emphasis on applicability to all cosmological models, observational bias, better statistics and robustness testing through numerical simulations---is discussed with relevance to a scheme originally introduced by Kochanek to avoid some of the uncertainties which plague other methods. The main result is that the observations at present---and probably in the future as well---are more indicative of intrinsic scatter than a hint of the correct cosmological model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

Cosmological parameters and the redshift distribution of gravitational lenses

For known gravitational lens systems the redshift distribution of the lenses is compared with theoretical expectations for $10^{4}$~Friedmann-Lema\^ıtre~cosmological models, which more than cover the range of possible cases. The comparison is used for assigning a relative probability to each of the models. The entire procedure is repeated for different values of the inhomogeneity parameter~$η$ and the limiting spectroscopic magnitude~$m_{\rm lim}$, which is important for selection effects. The dependence on these two parameters is examined in more detail for the special cases~$λ_{0}=0$ and $k=0$. Previous results that this method is a better probe for~$λ_{0}$ than $Ω_{0}$ are confirmed, but it appears that the low probability of models with large~$λ_{0}$~values found using similar methods is due to a selection effect. The power of this method to discriminate between cosmological models can of course be improved if more gravitational lens systems are found. However, our numerical simulations indicate that a reasonable number of observed systems cannot deliver interesting constraints on the cosmological parameters.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access