Researcher profile

Thomas Runkler

Thomas Runkler contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Ant Colony Optimization for Mining Gradual Patterns

Gradual pattern extraction is a field in (KDD) Knowledge Discovery in Databases that maps correlations between attributes of a data set as gradual dependencies. A gradual dependency may take a form of "the more Attribute K , the less Attribute L". In this paper, we propose an ant colony optimization technique that uses a probabilistic approach to learn and extract frequent gradual patterns. Through computational experiments on real-world data sets, we compared the performance of our ant-based algorithm to an existing gradual item set extraction algorithm and we found out that our algorithm outperforms the later especially when dealing with large data sets.

preprint2022arXiv

Comparing Model-free and Model-based Algorithms for Offline Reinforcement Learning

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) Algorithms are often designed with environments such as MuJoCo in mind, in which the planning horizon is extremely long and no noise exists. We compare model-free, model-based, as well as hybrid offline RL approaches on various industrial benchmark (IB) datasets to test the algorithms in settings closer to real world problems, including complex noise and partially observable states. We find that on the IB, hybrid approaches face severe difficulties and that simpler algorithms, such as rollout based algorithms or model-free algorithms with simpler regularizers perform best on the datasets.

preprint2022arXiv

How to Manage Tiny Machine Learning at Scale: An Industrial Perspective

Tiny machine learning (TinyML) has gained widespread popularity where machine learning (ML) is democratized on ubiquitous microcontrollers, processing sensor data everywhere in real-time. To manage TinyML in the industry, where mass deployment happens, we consider the hardware and software constraints, ranging from available onboard sensors and memory size to ML-model architectures and runtime platforms. However, Internet of Things (IoT) devices are typically tailored to specific tasks and are subject to heterogeneity and limited resources. Moreover, TinyML models have been developed with different structures and are often distributed without a clear understanding of their working principles, leading to a fragmented ecosystem. Considering these challenges, we propose a framework using Semantic Web technologies to enable the joint management of TinyML models and IoT devices at scale, from modeling information to discovering possible combinations and benchmarking, and eventually facilitate TinyML component exchange and reuse. We present an ontology (semantic schema) for neural network models aligned with the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Thing Description, which semantically describes IoT devices. Furthermore, a Knowledge Graph of 23 publicly available ML models and six IoT devices were used to demonstrate our concept in three case studies, and we shared the code and examples to enhance reproducibility: https://github.com/Haoyu-R/How-to-Manage-TinyML-at-Scale

preprint2019arXiv

Visual Evaluation of Generative Adversarial Networks for Time Series Data

A crucial factor to trust Machine Learning (ML) algorithm decisions is a good representation of its application field by the training dataset. This is particularly true when parts of the training data have been artificially generated to overcome common training problems such as lack of data or imbalanced dataset. Over the last few years, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have shown remarkable results in generating realistic data. However, this ML approach lacks an objective function to evaluate the quality of the generated data. Numerous GAN applications focus on generating image data mostly because they can be easily evaluated by a human eye. Less efforts have been made to generate time series data. Assessing their quality is more complicated, particularly for technical data. In this paper, we propose a human-centered approach supporting a ML or domain expert to accomplish this task using Visual Analytics (VA) techniques. The presented approach consists of two views, namely a GAN Iteration View showing similarity metrics between real and generated data over the iterations of the generation process and a Detailed Comparative View equipped with different time series visualizations such as TimeHistograms, to compare the generated data at different iteration steps. Starting from the GAN Iteration View, the user can choose suitable iteration steps for detailed inspection. We evaluate our approach with a usage scenario that enabled an efficient comparison of two different GAN models.