Researcher profile

Thomas Breuer

Thomas Breuer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Almost Worst Case Distributions in Multiple Priors Models

A worst case distribution is a minimiser of the expectation of some random payoff within a family of plausible risk factor distributions. The plausibility of a risk factor distribution is quantified by a convex integral functional. This includes the special cases of relative entropy, Bregman distance, and $f$-divergence. An ($ε$-$γ$)-almost worst case distribution is a risk factor distribution which violates the plausibility constraint at most by the amount $γ$ and for which the expected payoff is not better than the worst case by more than $ε$. From a practical point of view the localisation of almost worst case distributions may be useful for efficient hedging against them. We prove that the densities of almost worst case distributions cluster in the Bregman neighbourhood of a specified function, interpreted as worst case localiser. In regular cases, it coincides with the worst case density, but when the latter does not exist, the worst case localiser is perhaps not even a density. We also discuss the calculation of the worst case localiser, and its dependence on the threshold in the plausibility constraint.

preprint2013arXiv

Measuring Model Risk

We propose to interpret distribution model risk as sensitivity of expected loss to changes in the risk factor distribution, and to measure the distribution model risk of a portfolio by the maximum expected loss over a set of plausible distributions defined in terms of some divergence from an estimated distribution. The divergence may be relative entropy, a Bregman distance, or an $f$-divergence. We give formulas for the calculation of distribution model risk and explicitly determine the worst case distribution from the set of plausible distributions. We also give formulas for the evaluation of divergence preferences describing ambiguity averse decision makers.

preprint2012arXiv

GAP Computations Concerning Hamiltonian Cycles in the Generating Graphs of Finite Groups

This is a collection of examples showing how the GAP system can be used to compute information about the generating graphs of finite groups. It includes all examples that were needed for the computational results in the paper "Hamiltonian cycles in the generating graphs of finite groups" by Thomas Breuer, Robert M. Guralnick, Andrea Lucchini, Attila Maróti, and Gábor P. Nagy. The purpose of this writeup is twofold. On the one hand, the computations are documented this way. On the other hand, the GAP code shown for the examples can be used as test input for automatic checking of the data and the functions used.

preprint2012arXiv

GAP Computations Concerning Probabilistic Generation of Finite Simple Groups

This is a collection of examples showing how the GAP system can be used to compute information about the probabilistic generation of finite almost simple groups. It includes all examples that were needed for the computational results in the paper "Probabilistic generation of finite simple groups, II" by Thomas Breuer, Robert M. Guralnick, and William M. Kantor. The purpose of this writeup is twofold. On the one hand, the computations are documented this way. On the other hand, the GAP code shown for the examples can be used as test input for automatic checking of the data and the functions used.