BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Susana Gutierrez appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
We show that the endpoint Strichartz estimate for the kinetic transport equation is false in all dimensions. We also present a new approach to proving the non-endpoint cases using multilinear analysis.
We prove a logarithmic convexity result for exponentially weighted $L^2$-norms of solutions to electromagnetic Schrödinger equation, without needing to assume smallness of the magnetic potential. As a consequence, we can prove a unique continuation result in the style of the Hardy uncertainty principle, which generalizes the analogous theorems which have been recently proved by Escauriaza, Kenig, Ponce and Vega.
In this paper we will study the stability properties of self-similar solutions of 1-d cubic NLS equations with time-dependent coefficients of the form iu_t+u_{xx}+\frac{u}{2} (|u|^2-\frac{A}{t})=0, A\in \R (cubic). The study of the stability of these self-similar solutions is related, through the Hasimoto transformation, to the stability of some singular vortex dynamics in the setting of the Localized Induction Equation (LIE), an equation modeling the self-induced motion of vortex filaments in ideal fluids and superfluids. We follow the approach used by Banica and Vega that is based on the so-called pseudo-conformal transformation, which reduces the problem to the construction of modified wave operators for solutions of the equation iv_t+ v_{xx} +\frac{v}{2t}(|v|^2-A)=0. As a by-product of our results we prove that equation (cubic) is well-posed in appropriate function spaces when the initial datum is given by u(0,x)= z_0 \pv \frac{1}{x} for some values of z_0\in \C\setminus\{0\}, and A is adequately chosen. This is in deep contrast with the case when the initial datum is the Dirac-delta distribution.