BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sungrim Moon

Sungrim Moon contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computation and LanguageInformation Retrievalphysics.med-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Clinical Concept Extraction: a Methodology Review

Background Concept extraction, a subdomain of natural language processing (NLP) with a focus on extracting concepts of interest, has been adopted to computationally extract clinical information from text for a wide range of applications ranging from clinical decision support to care quality improvement. Objectives In this literature review, we provide a methodology review of clinical concept extraction, aiming to catalog development processes, available methods and tools, and specific considerations when developing clinical concept extraction applications. Methods Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search was conducted for retrieving EHR-based information extraction articles written in English and published from January 2009 through June 2019 from Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the ACM Digital Library. Results A total of 6,686 publications were retrieved. After title and abstract screening, 228 publications were selected. The methods used for developing clinical concept extraction applications were discussed in this review.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Real-World Data Analysis of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)

Background: One of the common causes of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young people is hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and the primary prevention of SCD is with an implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Concerning the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy and the complications associated with ICD implantation and discharge, patients with implanted ICDs are closely monitored and interrogation reports are generated from clinical consultations. Methods: In this study, we compared the performance of structured device data and unstructured interrogation reports for extracting information of ICD therapy and heart rhythm. We sampled 687 reports with a gold standard generated through manual chart review. A rule-based natural language processing (NLP) system was developed using 480 reports and the information in the corresponding device data was aggregated for the task. We compared the performance of the NLP system with information aggregated from structured device data using the remaining 207 reports. Results: The rule-based NLP system achieved F-measure of 0.92 and 0.98 for ICD therapy and heart rhythm while the performance of aggregating device data was significantly lower with F-measure of 0.78 and 0.45 respectively. Limitations of using only structured device data include no differentiation of real events from management events, data availability, and disparate perspectives of vendor and data granularity while using interrogation reports needs to overcome non-representative keyword/pattern and contextual errors. Conclusions: Extracting phenotyping information from data generated in real-world requires the incorporation of medical knowledge. It is essential to analyze, compare, and harmonize multiple data sources for real-world evidence generation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Adapting and evaluating a deep learning language model for clinical why-question answering

Objectives: To adapt and evaluate a deep learning language model for answering why-questions based on patient-specific clinical text. Materials and Methods: Bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) models were trained with varying data sources to perform SQuAD 2.0 style why-question answering (why-QA) on clinical notes. The evaluation focused on: 1) comparing the merits from different training data, 2) error analysis. Results: The best model achieved an accuracy of 0.707 (or 0.760 by partial match). Training toward customization for the clinical language helped increase 6% in accuracy. Discussion: The error analysis suggested that the model did not really perform deep reasoning and that clinical why-QA might warrant more sophisticated solutions. Conclusion: The BERT model achieved moderate accuracy in clinical why-QA and should benefit from the rapidly evolving technology. Despite the identified limitations, it could serve as a competent proxy for question-driven clinical information extraction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access