BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Andrew Wen

Andrew Wen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computation and LanguageInformation RetrievalArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learningphysics.med-phQuantitative Methods

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Clinical Document Metadata Extraction: A Scoping Review

Clinical document metadata, such as document type, structure, author role, medical specialty, and encounter setting, is essential for accurate interpretation of information captured in clinical documents. However, vast documentation heterogeneity and drift over time challenge harmonization of document metadata. Automated extraction methods have emerged to coalesce metadata from disparate practices into target schema. This scoping review aims to catalog research on clinical document metadata extraction, identify methodological trends and applications, and highlight gaps. We followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines to identify articles that perform clinical document metadata extraction. We initially found and screened 266 articles published between January 2011 and August 2025, then comprehensively reviewed 67 we deemed relevant to our study. Among the articles included, 45 were methodological, 17 used document metadata as features in a downstream application, and 5 analyzed document metadata composition. We observe myriad purposes for methodological study and application types. Available labelled public data remains sparse except for structural section datasets. Methods for extracting document metadata have progressed from largely rule-based and traditional machine learning with ample feature engineering to transformer-based architectures with minimal feature engineering. The emergence of large language models has enabled broader exploration of generalizability across tasks and datasets, allowing the possibility of advanced clinical text processing systems. We anticipate that research will continue to expand into richer document metadata representations and integrate further into clinical applications and workflows.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

An Open Natural Language Processing Development Framework for EHR-based Clinical Research: A case demonstration using the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)

While we pay attention to the latest advances in clinical natural language processing (NLP), we can notice some resistance in the clinical and translational research community to adopt NLP models due to limited transparency, interpretability, and usability. In this study, we proposed an open natural language processing development framework. We evaluated it through the implementation of NLP algorithms for the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C). Based on the interests in information extraction from COVID-19 related clinical notes, our work includes 1) an open data annotation process using COVID-19 signs and symptoms as the use case, 2) a community-driven ruleset composing platform, and 3) a synthetic text data generation workflow to generate texts for information extraction tasks without involving human subjects. The corpora were derived from texts from three different institutions (Mayo Clinic, University of Kentucky, University of Minnesota). The gold standard annotations were tested with a single institution's (Mayo) ruleset. This resulted in performances of 0.876, 0.706, and 0.694 in F-scores for Mayo, Minnesota, and Kentucky test datasets, respectively. The study as a consortium effort of the N3C NLP subgroup demonstrates the feasibility of creating a federated NLP algorithm development and benchmarking platform to enhance multi-institution clinical NLP study and adoption. Although we use COVID-19 as a use case in this effort, our framework is general enough to be applied to other domains of interest in clinical NLP.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Comparisons of Graph Neural Networks on Cancer Classification Leveraging a Joint of Phenotypic and Genetic Features

Cancer is responsible for millions of deaths worldwide every year. Although significant progress hasbeen achieved in cancer medicine, many issues remain to be addressed for improving cancer therapy.Appropriate cancer patient stratification is the prerequisite for selecting appropriate treatment plan, ascancer patients are of known heterogeneous genetic make-ups and phenotypic differences. In thisstudy, built upon deep phenotypic characterizations extractable from Mayo Clinic electronic healthrecords (EHRs) and genetic test reports for a collection of cancer patients, we evaluated variousgraph neural networks (GNNs) leveraging a joint of phenotypic and genetic features for cancer typeclassification. Models were applied and fine-tuned on the Mayo Clinic cancer disease dataset. Theassessment was done through the reported accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 values as well as throughF1 scores based on the disease class. Per our evaluation results, GNNs on average outperformed thebaseline models with mean statistics always being higher that those of the baseline models (0.849 vs0.772 for accuracy, 0.858 vs 0.794 for precision, 0.843 vs 0.759 for recall, and 0.843 vs 0.855 for F1score). Among GNNs, ChebNet, GraphSAGE, and TAGCN showed the best performance, while GATshowed the worst. We applied and compared eight GNN models including AGNN, ChebNet, GAT,GCN, GIN, GraphSAGE, SGC, and TAGCN on the Mayo Clinic cancer disease dataset and assessedtheir performance as well as compared them with each other and with more conventional machinelearning models such as decision tree, gradient boosting, multi-layer perceptron, naive bayes, andrandom forest which we used as the baselines.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Clinical Concept Extraction: a Methodology Review

Background Concept extraction, a subdomain of natural language processing (NLP) with a focus on extracting concepts of interest, has been adopted to computationally extract clinical information from text for a wide range of applications ranging from clinical decision support to care quality improvement. Objectives In this literature review, we provide a methodology review of clinical concept extraction, aiming to catalog development processes, available methods and tools, and specific considerations when developing clinical concept extraction applications. Methods Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search was conducted for retrieving EHR-based information extraction articles written in English and published from January 2009 through June 2019 from Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the ACM Digital Library. Results A total of 6,686 publications were retrieved. After title and abstract screening, 228 publications were selected. The methods used for developing clinical concept extraction applications were discussed in this review.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Real-World Data Analysis of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)

Background: One of the common causes of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young people is hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and the primary prevention of SCD is with an implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Concerning the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy and the complications associated with ICD implantation and discharge, patients with implanted ICDs are closely monitored and interrogation reports are generated from clinical consultations. Methods: In this study, we compared the performance of structured device data and unstructured interrogation reports for extracting information of ICD therapy and heart rhythm. We sampled 687 reports with a gold standard generated through manual chart review. A rule-based natural language processing (NLP) system was developed using 480 reports and the information in the corresponding device data was aggregated for the task. We compared the performance of the NLP system with information aggregated from structured device data using the remaining 207 reports. Results: The rule-based NLP system achieved F-measure of 0.92 and 0.98 for ICD therapy and heart rhythm while the performance of aggregating device data was significantly lower with F-measure of 0.78 and 0.45 respectively. Limitations of using only structured device data include no differentiation of real events from management events, data availability, and disparate perspectives of vendor and data granularity while using interrogation reports needs to overcome non-representative keyword/pattern and contextual errors. Conclusions: Extracting phenotyping information from data generated in real-world requires the incorporation of medical knowledge. It is essential to analyze, compare, and harmonize multiple data sources for real-world evidence generation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Adapting and evaluating a deep learning language model for clinical why-question answering

Objectives: To adapt and evaluate a deep learning language model for answering why-questions based on patient-specific clinical text. Materials and Methods: Bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) models were trained with varying data sources to perform SQuAD 2.0 style why-question answering (why-QA) on clinical notes. The evaluation focused on: 1) comparing the merits from different training data, 2) error analysis. Results: The best model achieved an accuracy of 0.707 (or 0.760 by partial match). Training toward customization for the clinical language helped increase 6% in accuracy. Discussion: The error analysis suggested that the model did not really perform deep reasoning and that clinical why-QA might warrant more sophisticated solutions. Conclusion: The BERT model achieved moderate accuracy in clinical why-QA and should benefit from the rapidly evolving technology. Despite the identified limitations, it could serve as a competent proxy for question-driven clinical information extraction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access