BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sudipta Paul

Sudipta Paul contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Machine LearningCryptography and SecurityComputer VisionDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingInformation Retrieval

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

ARA : Aggregated RAPPOR and Analysis for Centralized Differential Privacy

Differential privacy(DP) has now become a standard in case of sensitive statistical data analysis. The two main approaches in DP is local and central. Both the approaches have a clear gap in terms of data storing,amount of data to be analyzed, analysis, speed etc. Local wins on the speed. We have tested the state of the art standard RAPPOR which is a local approach and supported this gap. Our work completely focuses on that part too. Here, we propose a model which initially collects RAPPOR reports from multiple clients which are then pushed to a Tf-Idf estimation model. The Tf-Idf estimation model then estimates the reports on the basis of the occurrence of "on bit" in a particular position and its contribution to that position. Thus it generates a centralized differential privacy analysis from multiple clients. Our model successfully and efficiently analyzed the major truth value every time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

BUDS: Balancing Utility and Differential Privacy by Shuffling

Balancing utility and differential privacy by shuffling or \textit{BUDS} is an approach towards crowd-sourced, statistical databases, with strong privacy and utility balance using differential privacy theory. Here, a novel algorithm is proposed using one-hot encoding and iterative shuffling with the loss estimation and risk minimization techniques, to balance both the utility and privacy. In this work, after collecting one-hot encoded data from different sources and clients, a step of novel attribute shuffling technique using iterative shuffling (based on the query asked by the analyst) and loss estimation with an updation function and risk minimization produces a utility and privacy balanced differential private report. During empirical test of balanced utility and privacy, BUDS produces $ε= 0.02$ which is a very promising result. Our algorithm maintains a privacy bound of $ε= ln [t/((n_1 - 1)^S)]$ and loss bound of $c' \bigg|e^{ln[t/((n_1 - 1)^S)]} - 1\bigg|$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Connecting the Dots: Detecting Adversarial Perturbations Using Context Inconsistency

There has been a recent surge in research on adversarial perturbations that defeat Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) in machine vision; most of these perturbation-based attacks target object classifiers. Inspired by the observation that humans are able to recognize objects that appear out of place in a scene or along with other unlikely objects, we augment the DNN with a system that learns context consistency rules during training and checks for the violations of the same during testing. Our approach builds a set of auto-encoders, one for each object class, appropriately trained so as to output a discrepancy between the input and output if an added adversarial perturbation violates context consistency rules. Experiments on PASCAL VOC and MS COCO show that our method effectively detects various adversarial attacks and achieves high ROC-AUC (over 0.95 in most cases); this corresponds to over 20% improvement over a state-of-the-art context-agnostic method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

FLaPS: Federated Learning and Privately Scaling

Federated learning (FL) is a distributed learning process where the model (weights and checkpoints) is transferred to the devices that posses data rather than the classical way of transferring and aggregating the data centrally. In this way, sensitive data does not leave the user devices. FL uses the FedAvg algorithm, which is trained in the iterative model averaging way, on the non-iid and unbalanced distributed data, without depending on the data quantity. Some issues with the FL are, 1) no scalability, as the model is iteratively trained over all the devices, which amplifies with device drops; 2) security and privacy trade-off of the learning process still not robust enough and 3) overall communication efficiency and the cost are higher. To mitigate these challenges we present Federated Learning and Privately Scaling (FLaPS) architecture, which improves scalability as well as the security and privacy of the system. The devices are grouped into clusters which further gives better privacy scaled turn around time to finish a round of training. Therefore, even if a device gets dropped in the middle of training, the whole process can be started again after a definite amount of time. The data and model both are communicated using differentially private reports with iterative shuffling which provides a better privacy-utility trade-off. We evaluated FLaPS on MNIST, CIFAR10, and TINY-IMAGENET-200 dataset using various CNN models. Experimental results prove FLaPS to be an improved, time and privacy scaled environment having better and comparable after-learning-parameters with respect to the central and FL models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

LAC : LSTM AUTOENCODER with Community for Insider Threat Detection

The employees of any organization, institute, or industry, spend a significant amount of time on a computer network, where they develop their own routine of activities in the form of network transactions over a time period. Insider threat detection involves identifying deviations in the routines or anomalies which may cause harm to the organization in the form of data leaks and secrets sharing. If not automated, this process involves feature engineering for modeling human behavior which is a tedious and time-consuming task. Anomalies in human behavior are forwarded to a human analyst for final threat classification. We developed an unsupervised deep neural network model using LSTM AUTOENCODER which learns to mimic the behavior of individual employees from their day-wise time-stamped sequence of activities. It predicts the threat scenario via significant loss from anomalous routine. Employees in a community tend to align their routine with each other rather than the employees outside their communities, this motivates us to explore a variation of the AUTOENCODER, LSTM AUTOENCODER- trained on the interleaved sequences of activities in the Community (LAC). We evaluate the model on the CERT v6.2 dataset and perform analysis on the loss for normal and anomalous routine across 4000 employees. The aim of our paper is to detect the anomalous employees as well as to explore how the surrounding employees are affecting that employees' routine over time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Learning With Differential Privacy

The leakage of data might have been an extreme effect on the personal level if it contains sensitive information. Common prevention methods like encryption-decryption, endpoint protection, intrusion detection system are prone to leakage. Differential privacy comes to the rescue with a proper promise of protection against leakage, as it uses a randomized response technique at the time of collection of the data which promises strong privacy with better utility. Differential privacy allows one to access the forest of data by describing their pattern of groups without disclosing any individual trees. The current adaption of differential privacy by leading tech companies and academia encourages authors to explore the topic in detail. The different aspects of differential privacy, it's application in privacy protection and leakage of information, a comparative discussion, on the current research approaches in this field, its utility in the real world as well as the trade-offs - will be discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access