Source author record

Stephen Portnoy

Stephen Portnoy appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.ST Statistics Theory q-fin.GN q-fin.ST

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

4topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Valid confidence intervals for $μ, σ$ when there is only one observation available

Portnoy (2019) considered the problem of constructing an optimal confidence interval for the mean based on a single observation $\, X \sim {\cal{N}}(μ, \, σ^2) \,$. Here we extend this result to obtaining 1-sample confidence intervals for $\, σ\,$ and to cases of symmetric unimodal distributions and of distributions with compact support. Finally, we extend the multivariate result in Portnoy (2019) to allow a sample of size $\, m \,$ from a multivariate normal distribution where $m$ may be less than the dimension.

preprint2021arXiv

Predicting CEO Compensation in Non-Controlled Public Corporations with the Canonical Regression Quantile Method

The use of the Canonical Regression Quantiles Index proved that non-controlled companies that engage in long-term operational and financial goals post superior future performance. The Index indicates that current CEO compensation influences future performance. The Index provides a method for determining CEO pay for the next 1-2 year and is a useful method to distinguish over/underpaid CEOs as an unbiased alternative to the peer groups comparison used by most compensation consultants. This determination is statistically weak, but future research using the Canonical Regression Quantiles with a larger data set may lead to increased sensitivity and a powerful unbiased method for replacing compensation consultants who are responsible for the decoupling of CEO compensation and corporate performance.

preprint2015arXiv

Exact Probability Bounds under Moment-matching Restrictions

Lindsay and Basak (2000) posed the question of how far from normality could a distribution be if it matches $k$ normal moments. They provided a bound on the maximal difference in c.d.f.'s, and implied that these bounds were attained. It will be shown here that in fact the bound is not attained if the number of even moments matched is odd. An explicit solution is developed as a symmetric distribution with a finite number of mass points when the number of even moments matched is even, and this bound for the even case is shown to hold as an explicit limit for the subsequent odd case.

preprint2012arXiv

Nearly root-n approximation for regression quantile processes

Traditionally, assessing the accuracy of inference based on regression quantiles has relied on the Bahadur representation. This provides an error of order $n^{-1/4}$ in normal approximations, and suggests that inference based on regression quantiles may not be as reliable as that based on other (smoother) approaches, whose errors are generally of order $n^{-1/2}$ (or better in special symmetric cases). Fortunately, extensive simulations and empirical applications show that inference for regression quantiles shares the smaller error rates of other procedures. In fact, the "Hungarian" construction of Komlós, Major and Tusnády [Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 32 (1975) 111-131, Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 34 (1976) 33-58] provides an alternative expansion for the one-sample quantile process with nearly the root-$n$ error rate (specifically, to within a factor of $\log n$). Such an expansion is developed here to provide a theoretical foundation for more accurate approximations for inference in regression quantile models. One specific application of independent interest is a result establishing that for conditional inference, the error rate for coverage probabilities using the Hall and Sheather [J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 50 (1988) 381-391] method of sparsity estimation matches their one-sample rate.