BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Stéphane Clinchant

Stéphane Clinchant contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computation and LanguageInformation RetrievalArtificial Intelligence

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Efficient Listwise Reranking with Compressed Document Representations

Reranking, the process of refining the output from a first-stage retriever, is often considered computationally expensive, especially when using Large Language Models (LLMs). A common approach to mitigate this cost involves utilizing smaller LLMs or controlling input length. Inspired by recent advances in document compression for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), we introduce RRK, an efficient and effective listwise reranker compressing documents into multi-token fixed-size embedding representations. Our simple training via distillation shows that this combination of rich compressed representations and listwise reranking yields a highly efficient and effective system. In particular, our 8B-parameter model runs 3x-18x faster than smaller rerankers (0.6-4B parameters) while matching or outperforming them in effectiveness. The efficiency gains are even more striking on long-document benchmarks, where RRK widens its advantage further.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

An Efficiency Study for SPLADE Models

Latency and efficiency issues are often overlooked when evaluating IR models based on Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) in reason of multiple hardware and software testing scenarios. Nevertheless, efficiency is an important part of such systems and should not be overlooked. In this paper, we focus on improving the efficiency of the SPLADE model since it has achieved state-of-the-art zero-shot performance and competitive results on TREC collections. SPLADE efficiency can be controlled via a regularization factor, but solely controlling this regularization has been shown to not be efficient enough. In order to reduce the latency gap between SPLADE and traditional retrieval systems, we propose several techniques including L1 regularization for queries, a separation of document/query encoders, a FLOPS-regularized middle-training, and the use of faster query encoders. Our benchmark demonstrates that we can drastically improve the efficiency of these models while increasing the performance metrics on in-domain data. To our knowledge, {we propose the first neural models that, under the same computing constraints, \textit{achieve similar latency (less than 4ms difference) as traditional BM25}, while having \textit{similar performance (less than 10\% MRR@10 reduction)} as the state-of-the-art single-stage neural rankers on in-domain data}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

From Distillation to Hard Negative Sampling: Making Sparse Neural IR Models More Effective

Neural retrievers based on dense representations combined with Approximate Nearest Neighbors search have recently received a lot of attention, owing their success to distillation and/or better sampling of examples for training -- while still relying on the same backbone architecture. In the meantime, sparse representation learning fueled by traditional inverted indexing techniques has seen a growing interest, inheriting from desirable IR priors such as explicit lexical matching. While some architectural variants have been proposed, a lesser effort has been put in the training of such models. In this work, we build on SPLADE -- a sparse expansion-based retriever -- and show to which extent it is able to benefit from the same training improvements as dense models, by studying the effect of distillation, hard-negative mining as well as the Pre-trained Language Model initialization. We furthermore study the link between effectiveness and efficiency, on in-domain and zero-shot settings, leading to state-of-the-art results in both scenarios for sufficiently expressive models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

LayoutXLM vs. GNN: An Empirical Evaluation of Relation Extraction for Documents

This paper investigates the Relation Extraction task in documents by benchmarking two different neural network models: a multi-modal language model (LayoutXLM) and a Graph Neural Network: Edge Convolution Network (ECN). For this benchmark, we use the XFUND dataset, released along with LayoutXLM. While both models reach similar results, they both exhibit very different characteristics. This raises the question on how to integrate various modalities in a neural network: by merging all modalities thanks to additional pretraining (LayoutXLM), or in a cascaded way (ECN). We conclude by discussing some methodological issues that must be considered for new datasets and task definition in the domain of Information Extraction with complex documents.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access