Paper detail

Efficient Listwise Reranking with Compressed Document Representations

Reranking, the process of refining the output from a first-stage retriever, is often considered computationally expensive, especially when using Large Language Models (LLMs). A common approach to mitigate this cost involves utilizing smaller LLMs or controlling input length. Inspired by recent advances in document compression for retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), we introduce RRK, an efficient and effective listwise reranker compressing documents into multi-token fixed-size embedding representations. Our simple training via distillation shows that this combination of rich compressed representations and listwise reranking yields a highly efficient and effective system. In particular, our 8B-parameter model runs 3x-18x faster than smaller rerankers (0.6-4B parameters) while matching or outperforming them in effectiveness. The efficiency gains are even more striking on long-document benchmarks, where RRK widens its advantage further.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.