Paper detail

LayoutXLM vs. GNN: An Empirical Evaluation of Relation Extraction for Documents

This paper investigates the Relation Extraction task in documents by benchmarking two different neural network models: a multi-modal language model (LayoutXLM) and a Graph Neural Network: Edge Convolution Network (ECN). For this benchmark, we use the XFUND dataset, released along with LayoutXLM. While both models reach similar results, they both exhibit very different characteristics. This raises the question on how to integrate various modalities in a neural network: by merging all modalities thanks to additional pretraining (LayoutXLM), or in a cascaded way (ECN). We conclude by discussing some methodological issues that must be considered for new datasets and task definition in the domain of Information Extraction with complex documents.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.