BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Stefan Sperlich

Stefan Sperlich contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
MethodologyComputationmath.APmath.PRmath.STStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Marginal and Conditional Multiple Inference for Linear Mixed Model Predictors

In spite of its high practical relevance, cluster specific multiple inference for linear mixed model predictors has hardly been addressed so far. While marginal inference for population parameters is well understood, conditional inference for the cluster specific predictors is more intricate. This work introduces a general framework for multiple inference in linear mixed models for cluster specific predictors. Consistent confidence sets for multiple inference are constructed under both, the marginal and the conditional law. Furthermore, it is shown that, remarkably, corresponding multiple marginal confidence sets are also asymptotically valid for conditional inference. Those lend themselves for testing linear hypotheses using standard quantiles without the need of re-sampling techniques. All findings are validated in simulations and illustrated along a study on Covid-19 mortality in US state prisons.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Simple bootstrap for linear mixed effects under model misspecification

Linear mixed effects are considered excellent predictors of cluster-level parameters in various domains. However, previous work has shown that their performance can be seriously affected by departures from modelling assumptions. Since the latter are common in applied studies, there is a need for inferential methods which are to certain extent robust to misspecfications, but at the same time simple enough to be appealing for practitioners. We construct statistical tools for cluster-wise and simultaneous inference for mixed effects under model misspecification using straightforward semiparametric random effect bootstrap. In our theoretical analysis, we show that our methods are asymptotically consistent under general regularity conditions. In simulations our intervals were robust to severe departures from model assumptions and performed better than their competitors in terms of empirical coverage probability.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

New Bias Calibration for Robust Estimation in Small Areas

Using sample surveys as a cost effective tool to provide estimates for characteristics of interest at population and sub-populations (area/domain) level has a long tradition in "small area estimation". However, the existence of outliers in the sample data can significantly affect the estimation for areas in which they occur, especially where the domain-sample size is small. Based on existing robust estimators for small area estimation we propose two novel approaches for bias calibration. A series of simulations shows that our methods lead to more efficient estimators in comparison with other existing bias-calibration methods. As a real data example we apply our estimators to obtain \textit{Gini} coefficients in labour market areas of the Tuscany region of Italy, where our sources of information are the EU-SILC survey and the Italian census. This analysis shows that the new methods reveal a different picture than existing methods. We extend our ideas to predictions for non-sampled areas.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access