Source author record

Stefan Sperlich

Stefan Sperlich appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Marginal and Conditional Multiple Inference for Linear Mixed Model Predictors

In spite of its high practical relevance, cluster specific multiple inference for linear mixed model predictors has hardly been addressed so far. While marginal inference for population parameters is well understood, conditional inference for the cluster specific predictors is more intricate. This work introduces a general framework for multiple inference in linear mixed models for cluster specific predictors. Consistent confidence sets for multiple inference are constructed under both, the marginal and the conditional law. Furthermore, it is shown that, remarkably, corresponding multiple marginal confidence sets are also asymptotically valid for conditional inference. Those lend themselves for testing linear hypotheses using standard quantiles without the need of re-sampling techniques. All findings are validated in simulations and illustrated along a study on Covid-19 mortality in US state prisons.

preprint2022arXiv

Simple bootstrap for linear mixed effects under model misspecification

Linear mixed effects are considered excellent predictors of cluster-level parameters in various domains. However, previous work has shown that their performance can be seriously affected by departures from modelling assumptions. Since the latter are common in applied studies, there is a need for inferential methods which are to certain extent robust to misspecfications, but at the same time simple enough to be appealing for practitioners. We construct statistical tools for cluster-wise and simultaneous inference for mixed effects under model misspecification using straightforward semiparametric random effect bootstrap. In our theoretical analysis, we show that our methods are asymptotically consistent under general regularity conditions. In simulations our intervals were robust to severe departures from model assumptions and performed better than their competitors in terms of empirical coverage probability.

preprint2021arXiv

New Bias Calibration for Robust Estimation in Small Areas

Using sample surveys as a cost effective tool to provide estimates for characteristics of interest at population and sub-populations (area/domain) level has a long tradition in "small area estimation". However, the existence of outliers in the sample data can significantly affect the estimation for areas in which they occur, especially where the domain-sample size is small. Based on existing robust estimators for small area estimation we propose two novel approaches for bias calibration. A series of simulations shows that our methods lead to more efficient estimators in comparison with other existing bias-calibration methods. As a real data example we apply our estimators to obtain \textit{Gini} coefficients in labour market areas of the Tuscany region of Italy, where our sources of information are the EU-SILC survey and the Italian census. This analysis shows that the new methods reveal a different picture than existing methods. We extend our ideas to predictions for non-sampled areas.

preprint2013arXiv

Kernel-based semiparametric multinomial logit modelling of political party affiliation

Conventional, parametric multinomial logit models are in general not sufficient for detecting the complex patterns voter profiles nowadays typically exhibit. In this manuscript, we use a semiparametric multinomial logit model to give a detailed analysis of the composition of a subsample of the German electorate in 2006. Germany is a particularly strong case for more flexible nonparametric approaches in this context, since due to the reunification and the preceding different political histories the composition of the electorate is very complex and nuanced. Our analysis reveals strong interactions of the covariates age and income, and highly nonlinear shapes of the factor impacts for each party's likelihood to be voted. Notably, we develop and provide a smoothed likelihood estimator for semiparametric multinomial logit models, which can be applied also in other application fields, such as, e.g., marketing.

preprint2012arXiv

A comparative study of new cross-validated bandwidth selectors for kernel density estimation

Recent contributions to kernel smoothing show that the performance of cross-validated bandwidth selectors improve significantly from indirectness. Indirect crossvalidation first estimates the classical cross-validated bandwidth from a more rough and difficult smoothing problem than the original one and then rescales this indirect bandwidth to become a bandwidth of the original problem. The motivation for this approach comes from the observation that classical crossvalidation tends to work better when the smoothing problem is difficult. In this paper we find that the performance of indirect crossvalidation improves theoretically and practically when the polynomial order of the indirect kernel increases, with the Gaussian kernel as limiting kernel when the polynomial order goes to infinity. These theoretical and practical results support the often proposed choice of the Gaussian kernel as indirect kernel. However, for do-validation our study shows a discrepancy between asymptotic theory and practical performance. As for indirect crossvalidation, in asymptotic theory the performance of indirect do-validation improves with increasing polynomial order of the used indirect kernel. But this theoretical improvements do not carry over to practice and the original do-validation still seems to be our preferred bandwidth selector. We also consider plug-in estimation and combinations of plug-in bandwidths and crossvalidated bandwidths. These latter bandwidths do not outperform the original do-validation estimator either.