BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jens Perch Nielsen

Jens Perch Nielsen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.STStatistics TheoryMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Smooth backfitting of proportional hazards with multiplicative components

Smooth backfitting has proven to have a number of theoretical and practical advantages in structured regression. Smooth backfitting projects the data down onto the structured space of interest providing a direct link between data and estimator. This paper introduces the ideas of smooth backfitting to survival analysis in a proportional hazard model, where we assume an underlying conditional hazard with multiplicative components. We develop asymptotic theory for the estimator and we use the smooth backfitter in a practical application, where we extend recent advances of in-sample forecasting methodology by allowing more information to be incorporated, while still obeying the structured requirements of in-sample forecasting.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

A comparative study of new cross-validated bandwidth selectors for kernel density estimation

Recent contributions to kernel smoothing show that the performance of cross-validated bandwidth selectors improve significantly from indirectness. Indirect crossvalidation first estimates the classical cross-validated bandwidth from a more rough and difficult smoothing problem than the original one and then rescales this indirect bandwidth to become a bandwidth of the original problem. The motivation for this approach comes from the observation that classical crossvalidation tends to work better when the smoothing problem is difficult. In this paper we find that the performance of indirect crossvalidation improves theoretically and practically when the polynomial order of the indirect kernel increases, with the Gaussian kernel as limiting kernel when the polynomial order goes to infinity. These theoretical and practical results support the often proposed choice of the Gaussian kernel as indirect kernel. However, for do-validation our study shows a discrepancy between asymptotic theory and practical performance. As for indirect crossvalidation, in asymptotic theory the performance of indirect do-validation improves with increasing polynomial order of the used indirect kernel. But this theoretical improvements do not carry over to practice and the original do-validation still seems to be our preferred bandwidth selector. We also consider plug-in estimation and combinations of plug-in bandwidths and crossvalidated bandwidths. These latter bandwidths do not outperform the original do-validation estimator either.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Nonparametric regression with filtered data

We present a general principle for estimating a regression function nonparametrically, allowing for a wide variety of data filtering, for example, repeated left truncation and right censoring. Both the mean and the median regression cases are considered. The method works by first estimating the conditional hazard function or conditional survivor function and then integrating. We also investigate improved methods that take account of model structure such as independent errors and show that such methods can improve performance when the model structure is true. We establish the pointwise asymptotic normality of our estimators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access