BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Stefan Kratsch appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
In this report we present an algorithm solving Triangle Counting in time $O(d^2n+m)$, where n and m, respectively, denote the number of vertices and edges of a graph G and d denotes its twin-width, a recently introduced graph parameter. We assume that a compact representation of a d-contraction sequence of G is given.
We extend the notion of lossy kernelization, introduced by Lokshtanov et al. [STOC 2017], to approximate Turing kernelization. An $α$-approximate Turing kernel for a parameterized optimization problem is a polynomial-time algorithm that, when given access to an oracle that outputs $c$-approximate solutions in $O(1)$ time, obtains an $(α\cdot c)$-approximate solution to the considered problem, using calls to the oracle of size at most $f(k)$ for some function $f$ that only depends on the parameter. Using this definition, we show that Independent Set parameterized by treewidth $\ell$ has a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate Turing kernel with $O(\frac{\ell^2}{\varepsilon})$ vertices, answering an open question posed by Lokshtanov et al. [STOC 2017]. Furthermore, we give $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate Turing kernels for the following graph problems parameterized by treewidth: Vertex Cover, Edge Clique Cover, Edge-Disjoint Triangle Packing and Connected Vertex Cover. We generalize the result for Independent Set and Vertex Cover, by showing that all graph problems that we will call "friendly" admit $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate Turing kernels of polynomial size when parameterized by treewidth. We use this to obtain approximate Turing kernels for Vertex-Disjoint $H$-packing for connected graphs $H$, Clique Cover, Feedback Vertex Set and Edge Dominating Set.
Computing all-pairs shortest paths is a fundamental and much-studied problem with many applications. Unfortunately, despite intense study, there are still no significantly faster algorithms for it than the $\mathcal{O}(n^3)$ time algorithm due to Floyd and Warshall (1962). Somewhat faster algorithms exist for the vertex-weighted version if fast matrix multiplication may be used. Yuster (SODA 2009) gave an algorithm running in time $\mathcal{O}(n^{2.842})$, but no combinatorial, truly subcubic algorithm is known. Motivated by the recent framework of efficient parameterized algorithms (or "FPT in P"), we investigate the influence of the graph parameters clique-width ($cw$) and modular-width ($mw$) on the running times of algorithms for solving All-Pairs Shortest Paths. We obtain efficient (and combinatorial) parameterized algorithms on non-negative vertex-weighted graphs of times $\mathcal{O}(cw^2n^2)$, resp. $\mathcal{O}(mw^2n + n^2)$. If fast matrix multiplication is allowed then the latter can be improved to $\mathcal{O}(mw^{1.842}n + n^2)$ using the algorithm of Yuster as a black box. The algorithm relative to modular-width is adaptive, meaning that the running time matches the best unparameterized algorithm for parameter value $mw$ equal to $n$, and they outperform them already for $mw \in \mathcal{O}(n^{1 - \varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$.
In the Vertex Cover problem we are given a graph $G=(V,E)$ and an integer $k$ and have to determine whether there is a set $X\subseteq V$ of size at most $k$ such that each edge in $E$ has at least one endpoint in $X$. The problem can be easily solved in time $O^*(2^k)$, making it fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) with respect to $k$. While the fastest known algorithm takes only time $O^*(1.2738^k)$, much stronger improvements have been obtained by studying parameters that are smaller than $k$. Apart from treewidth-related results, the arguably best algorithm for Vertex Cover runs in time $O^*(2.3146^p)$, where $p=k-LP(G)$ is only the excess of the solution size $k$ over the best fractional vertex cover (Lokshtanov et al.\ TALG 2014). Since $p\leq k$ but $k$ cannot be bounded in terms of $p$ alone, this strictly increases the range of tractable instances. Recently, Garg and Philip (SODA 2016) greatly contributed to understanding the parameterized complexity of the Vertex Cover problem. They prove that $2LP(G)-MM(G)$ is a lower bound for the vertex cover size of $G$, where $MM(G)$ is the size of a largest matching of $G$, and proceed to study parameter $\ell=k-(2LP(G)-MM(G))$. They give an algorithm of running time $O^*(3^\ell)$, proving that Vertex Cover is FPT in $\ell$. It can be easily observed that $\ell\leq p$ whereas $p$ cannot be bounded in terms of $\ell$ alone. We complement the work of Garg and Philip by proving that Vertex Cover admits a randomized polynomial kernelization in terms of $\ell$, i.e., an efficient preprocessing to size polynomial in $\ell$. This improves over parameter $p=k-LP(G)$ for which this was previously known (Kratsch and Wahlström FOCS 2012).
A bipartite graph $G=(L,R;E)$ with at least one edge is said to be identifiable if for every vertex $v\in L$, the subgraph induced by its non-neighbors has a matching of cardinality $|L|-1$. An $\ell$-subgraph of $G$ is an induced subgraph of $G$ obtained by deleting from it some vertices in $L$ together with all their neighbors. The Identifiable Subgraph problem is the problem of determining whether a given bipartite graph contains an identifiable $\ell$-subgraph. We show that the Identifiable Subgraph problem is polynomially solvable, along with the version of the problem in which the task is to delete as few vertices from $L$ as possible together with all their neighbors so that the resulting $\ell$-subgraph is identifiable. We also complement a known APX-hardness result for the complementary problem in which the task is to minimize the number of remaining vertices in $L$, by showing that two parameterized variants of the problem are W[1]-hard.
We study the NP-complete Minimum Shared Edges (MSE) problem. Given an undirected graph, a source and a sink vertex, and two integers p and k, the question is whether there are p paths in the graph connecting the source with the sink and sharing at most k edges. Herein, an edge is shared if it appears in at least two paths. We show that MSE is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the treewidth of the input graph and the number k of shared edges combined. We show that MSE is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to p, but does not admit a polynomial-size kernel (unless NP is contained in coNP/poly). In the proof of the fixed-parameter tractability of MSE parameterized by p, we employ the treewidth reduction technique due to Marx, O'Sullivan, and Razgon [ACM TALG 2013].
The Subset Feedback Vertex Set problem generalizes the classical Feedback Vertex Set problem and asks, for a given undirected graph $G=(V,E)$, a set $S \subseteq V$, and an integer $k$, whether there exists a set $X$ of at most $k$ vertices such that no cycle in $G-X$ contains a vertex of $S$. It was independently shown by Cygan et al. (ICALP '11, SIDMA '13) and Kawarabayashi and Kobayashi (JCTB '12) that Subset Feedback Vertex Set is fixed-parameter tractable for parameter $k$. Cygan et al. asked whether the problem also admits a polynomial kernelization. We answer the question of Cygan et al. positively by giving a randomized polynomial kernelization for the equivalent version where $S$ is a set of edges. In a first step we show that Edge Subset Feedback Vertex Set has a randomized polynomial kernel parameterized by $|S|+k$ with $O(|S|^2k)$ vertices. For this we use the matroid-based tools of Kratsch and Wahlström (FOCS '12) that for example were used to obtain a polynomial kernel for $s$-Multiway Cut. Next we present a preprocessing that reduces the given instance $(G,S,k)$ to an equivalent instance $(G',S',k')$ where the size of $S'$ is bounded by $O(k^4)$. These two results lead to a polynomial kernel for Subset Feedback Vertex Set with $O(k^9)$ vertices.
We investigate whether kernelization results can be obtained if we restrict kernelization algorithms to run in logarithmic space. This restriction for kernelization is motivated by the question of what results are attainable for preprocessing via simple and/or local reduction rules. We find kernelizations for d-Hitting Set(k), d-Set Packing(k), Edge Dominating Set(k) and a number of hitting and packing problems in graphs, each running in logspace. Additionally, we return to the question of linear-time kernelization. For d-Hitting Set(k) a linear-time kernelization was given by van Bevern [Algorithmica (2014)]. We give a simpler procedure and save a large constant factor in the size bound. Furthermore, we show that we can obtain a linear-time kernel for d-Set Packing(k) as well.
Kernelization is a theoretical formalization of efficient preprocessing for NP-hard problems. Empirically, preprocessing is highly successful in practice, for example in state-of-the-art ILP-solvers like CPLEX. Motivated by this, previous work studied the existence of kernelizations for ILP related problems, e.g., for testing feasibility of Ax <= b. In contrast to the observed success of CPLEX, however, the results were largely negative. Intuitively, practical instances have far more useful structure than the worst-case instances used to prove these lower bounds. In the present paper, we study the effect that subsystems with (Gaifman graph of) bounded treewidth or totally unimodularity have on the kernelizability of the ILP feasibility problem. We show that, on the positive side, if these subsystems have a small number of variables on which they interact with the remaining instance, then we can efficiently replace them by smaller subsystems of size polynomial in the domain without changing feasibility. Thus, if large parts of an instance consist of such subsystems, then this yields a substantial size reduction. We complement this by proving that relaxations to the considered structures, e.g., larger boundaries of the subsystems, allow worst-case lower bounds against kernelization. Thus, these relaxed structures can be used to build instance families that cannot be efficiently reduced, by any approach.
In the Vector Connectivity problem we are given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$, a demand function $ϕ\colon V\to\{0,\ldots,d\}$, and an integer $k$. The question is whether there exists a set $S$ of at most $k$ vertices such that every vertex $v\in V\setminus S$ has at least $ϕ(v)$ vertex-disjoint paths to $S$; this abstractly captures questions about placing servers or warehouses relative to demands. The problem is \NP-hard already for instances with $d=4$ (Cicalese et al., arXiv '14), admits a log-factor approximation (Boros et al., Networks '14), and is fixed-parameter tractable in terms of~$k$ (Lokshtanov, unpublished '14). We prove several results regarding kernelization and approximation for Vector Connectivity and the variant Vector $d$-Connectivity where the upper bound $d$ on demands is a fixed constant. For Vector $d$-Connectivity we give a factor $d$-approximation algorithm and construct a vertex-linear kernelization, i.e., an efficient reduction to an equivalent instance with $f(d)k=O(k)$ vertices. For Vector Connectivity we have a factor $\text{opt}$-approximation and we can show that it has no kernelization to size polynomial in $k$ or even $k+d$ unless $\mathsf{NP\subseteq coNP/poly}$, making $f(d)\operatorname{poly}(k)$ optimal for Vector $d$-Connectivity. Finally, we provide a write-up for fixed-parameter tractability of Vector Connectivity($k$) by giving an alternative FPT algorithm based on matroid intersection.
Kernelization is a formalization of efficient preprocessing for NP-hard problems using the framework of parameterized complexity. Among open problems in kernelization it has been asked many times whether there are deterministic polynomial kernelizations for Subset Sum and Knapsack when parameterized by the number $n$ of items. We answer both questions affirmatively by using an algorithm for compressing numbers due to Frank and Tardos (Combinatorica 1987). This result had been first used by Marx and Végh (ICALP 2013) in the context of kernelization. We further illustrate its applicability by giving polynomial kernels also for weighted versions of several well-studied parameterized problems. Furthermore, when parameterized by the different item sizes we obtain a polynomial kernelization for Subset Sum and an exponential kernelization for Knapsack. Finally, we also obtain kernelization results for polynomial integer programs.
In this work we study preprocessing for tractable problems when part of the input is unknown or uncertain. This comes up naturally if, e.g., the load of some machines or the congestion of some roads is not known far enough in advance, or if we have to regularly solve a problem over instances that are largely similar, e.g., daily airport scheduling with few charter flights. Unlike robust optimization, which also studies settings like this, our goal lies not in computing solutions that are (approximately) good for every instantiation. Rather, we seek to preprocess the known parts of the input, to speed up finding an optimal solution once the missing data is known. We present efficient algorithms that given an instance with partially uncertain input generate an instance of size polynomial in the amount of uncertain data that is equivalent for every instantiation of the unknown part. Concretely, we obtain such algorithms for Minimum Spanning Tree, Minimum Weight Matroid Basis, and Maximum Cardinality Bipartite Maxing, where respectively the weight of edges, weight of elements, and the availability of vertices is unknown for part of the input. Furthermore, we show that there are tractable problems, such as Small Connected Vertex Cover, for which one cannot hope to obtain similar results.
In this paper, we consider the notion of \emph{special treewidth}, recently introduced by Courcelle\cite{Courcelle2012}. In a special tree decomposition, for each vertex $v$ in a given graph, the bags containing $v$ form a rooted path. We show that the class of graphs of special treewidth at most two is closed under taking minors, and give the complete list of the six minor obstructions. As an intermediate result, we prove that every connected graph of special treewidth at most two can be constructed by arranging blocks of special treewidth at most two in a specific tree-like fashion. Inspired from the notion of special treewidth, we introduce three natural variants of treewidth, namely \emph{spaghetti treewidth}, \emph{strongly chordal treewidth} and \emph{directed spaghetti treewidth}. All these parameters lie between pathwidth and treewidth, and we provide common structural properties on these parameters. For each parameter, we prove that the class of graphs having the parameter at most two is minor closed, and we characterize those classes in terms of a \emph{tree of cycles} with additional conditions. Finally, we show that for each $k\geq 3$, the class of graphs with special treewidth, spaghetti treewidth, directed spaghetti treewidth, or strongly chordal treewidth, respectively at most $k$, is not closed under taking minors.
The $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem asks whether, for a given graph $G$, two proper $k$-colourings $α$ and $β$ of $G$, and a positive integer $\ell$, there exists a sequence of at most $\ell+1$ proper $k$-colourings of $G$ which starts with $α$ and ends with $β$ and where successive colourings in the sequence differ on exactly one vertex of $G$. We give a complete picture of the parameterized complexity of the $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem for each fixed $k$ when parameterized by $\ell$. First we show that the $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem is polynomial-time solvable for $k=3$, settling an open problem of Cereceda, van den Heuvel and Johnson. Then, for all $k \geq 4$, we show that the $k$-colouring reconfiguration problem, when parameterized by $\ell$, is fixed-parameter tractable (addressing a question of Mouawad, Nishimura, Raman, Simjour and Suzuki) but that it has no polynomial kernel unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses.
The Workflow Satisfiability Problem (WSP) is a problem of practical interest that arises whenever tasks need to be performed by authorized users, subject to constraints defined by business rules. We are required to decide whether there exists a plan -- an assignment of tasks to authorized users -- such that all constraints are satisfied. The WSP is, in fact, the conservative Constraint Satisfaction Problem (i.e., for each variable, here called task, we have a unary authorization constraint) and is, thus, NP-complete. It was observed by Wang and Li (2010) that the number k of tasks is often quite small and so can be used as a parameter, and several subsequent works have studied the parameterized complexity of WSP regarding parameter k. We take a more detailed look at the kernelization complexity of WSP(Γ) when Γ denotes a finite or infinite set of allowed constraints. Our main result is a dichotomy for the case that all constraints in Γ are regular: (1) We are able to reduce the number n of users to n' <= k. This entails a kernelization to size poly(k) for finite Γ, and, under mild technical conditions, to size poly(k+m) for infinite Γ, where m denotes the number of constraints. (2) Already WSP(R) for some R \in Γ allows no polynomial kernelization in k+m unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses.
Kernelization is a formalization of preprocessing for combinatorially hard problems. We modify the standard definition for kernelization, which allows any polynomial-time algorithm for the preprocessing, by requiring instead that the preprocessing runs in a streaming setting and uses $\mathcal{O}(poly(k)\log|x|)$ bits of memory on instances $(x,k)$. We obtain several results in this new setting, depending on the number of passes over the input that such a streaming kernelization is allowed to make. Edge Dominating Set turns out as an interesting example because it has no single-pass kernelization but two passes over the input suffice to match the bounds of the best standard kernelization.
This paper studies the kernelization complexity of graph coloring problems with respect to certain structural parameterizations of the input instances. We are interested in how well polynomial-time data reduction can provably shrink instances of coloring problems, in terms of the chosen parameter. It is well known that deciding 3-colorability is already NP-complete, hence parameterizing by the requested number of colors is not fruitful. Instead, we pick up on a research thread initiated by Cai (DAM, 2003) who studied coloring problems parameterized by the modification distance of the input graph to a graph class on which coloring is polynomial-time solvable; for example parameterizing by the number k of vertex-deletions needed to make the graph chordal. We obtain various upper and lower bounds for kernels of such parameterizations of q-Coloring, complementing Cai's study of the time complexity with respect to these parameters. Our results show that the existence of polynomial kernels for q-Coloring parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to a graph class F is strongly related to the existence of a function f(q) which bounds the number of vertices which are needed to preserve the NO-answer to an instance of q-List-Coloring on F.
We study the existence of polynomial kernels for the problem of deciding feasibility of integer linear programs (ILPs), and for finding good solutions for covering and packing ILPs. Our main results are as follows: First, we show that the ILP Feasibility problem admits no polynomial kernelization when parameterized by both the number of variables and the number of constraints, unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly. This extends to the restricted cases of bounded variable degree and bounded number of variables per constraint, and to covering and packing ILPs. Second, we give a polynomial kernelization for the Cover ILP problem, asking for a solution to Ax >= b with c^Tx <= k, parameterized by k, when A is row-sparse; this generalizes a known polynomial kernelization for the special case with 0/1-variables and coefficients (d-Hitting Set).
Integer linear programs (ILPs) are a widely applied framework for dealing with combinatorial problems that arise in practice. It is known, e.g., by the success of CPLEX, that preprocessing and simplification can greatly speed up the process of optimizing an ILP. The present work seeks to further the theoretical understanding of preprocessing for ILPs by initiating a rigorous study within the framework of parameterized complexity and kernelization. A famous result of Lenstra (Mathematics of Operations Research, 1983) shows that feasibility of any ILP with n variables and m constraints can be decided in time O(c^{n^3} m^c'). Thus, by a folklore argument, any such ILP admits a kernelization to an equivalent instance of size O(c^{n^3}). It is known, that unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses, no kernelization with size bound polynomial in n is possible. However, this lower bound only applies for the case when constraints may include an arbitrary number of variables since it follows from lower bounds for Satisfiability and Hitting Set, whose bounded arity variants admit polynomial kernelizations. We consider the feasibility problem for ILPs Ax<= b where A is an r-row-sparse matrix parameterized by the number of variables. We show that the kernelizability of this problem depends strongly on the range of the variables. If the range is unbounded then this problem does not admit a polynomial kernelization unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly. If, on the other hand, the range of each variable is polynomially bounded in n then we do get a polynomial kernelization. Additionally, this holds also for the more general case when the maximum range d is an additional parameter, i.e., the size obtained is polynomial in n+d.
The input to the NP-hard Point Line Cover problem (PLC) consists of a set $P$ of $n$ points on the plane and a positive integer $k$, and the question is whether there exists a set of at most $k$ lines which pass through all points in $P$. A simple polynomial-time reduction reduces any input to one with at most $k^2$ points. We show that this is essentially tight under standard assumptions. More precisely, unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its third level, there is no polynomial-time algorithm that reduces every instance $(P,k)$ of PLC to an equivalent instance with $O(k^{2-ε})$ points, for any $ε>0$. This answers, in the negative, an open problem posed by Lokshtanov (PhD Thesis, 2009). Our proof uses the machinery for deriving lower bounds on the size of kernels developed by Dell and van Melkebeek (STOC 2010). It has two main ingredients: We first show, by reduction from Vertex Cover, that PLC---conditionally---has no kernel of total size $O(k^{2-ε})$ bits. This does not directly imply the claimed lower bound on the number of points, since the best known polynomial-time encoding of a PLC instance with $n$ points requires $ω(n^{2})$ bits. To get around this we build on work of Goodman et al. (STOC 1989) and devise an oracle communication protocol of cost $O(n\log n)$ for PLC; its main building block is a bound of $O(n^{O(n)})$ for the order types of $n$ points that are not necessarily in general position, and an explicit algorithm that enumerates all possible order types of n points. This protocol and the lower bound on total size together yield the stated lower bound on the number of points. While a number of essentially tight polynomial lower bounds on total sizes of kernels are known, our result is---to the best of our knowledge---the first to show a nontrivial lower bound for structural/secondary parameters.
The notion of treewidth plays an important role in theoretical and practical studies of graph problems. It has been recognized that, especially in practical environments, when computing the treewidth of a graph it is invaluable to first apply an array of preprocessing rules that simplify and shrink it. This work seeks to prove rigorous performance guarantees for such preprocessing rules, both known and new ones, by studying them in the framework of kernelization from parameterized complexity. It is known that the NP-complete problem of determining whether a given graph G has treewidth at most k admits no polynomial-time preprocessing algorithm that reduces any input instance to size polynomial in k, unless NP is in coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its third level. In this paper we therefore consider structural graph measures larger than treewidth, and determine whether efficient preprocessing can shrink the instance size to a polynomial in such a parameter value. We prove that given an instance (G,k) of treewidth we can efficiently reduce its size to O(fvs(G)^4) vertices, where fvs(G) is the size of a minimum feedback vertex set in G. We can also prove a size reduction to O(vc(G)^3) vertices, where vc(G) is the size of a minimum vertex cover. Phrased in the language of parameterized complexity, we show that Treewidth has a polynomial kernel when parameterized by the size of a given feedback vertex set, and also by the size of a vertex cover. In contrast we show that Treewidth parameterized by the vertex-deletion distance to a single clique, and Weighted Treewidth parameterized by the size of a vertex cover, do not admit polynomial kernelizations unless NP is in coNP/poly.
In the Correlation Clustering, also known as Cluster Editing, we are given an undirected n-vertex graph G and a positive integer k. The task is to decide if G can be transformed into a cluster graph, i.e., a disjoint union of cliques, by changing at most k adjacencies, i.e. by adding/deleting at most k edges. We give a subexponential algorithm that, in time 2^O(sqrt(pk)) + n^O(1) decides whether G can be transformed into a cluster graph with p cliques by changing at most k adjacencies. We complement our algorithmic findings by the following tight lower bounds on the asymptotic behaviour of our algorithm. We show that, unless ETH fails, for any constant 0 < s <= 1, there is p = Theta(k^s) such that there is no algorithm deciding in time 2^o(sqrt(pk)) n^O(1) whether G can be transformed into a cluster graph with p cliques by changing at most k adjacencies.
For an even integer t \geq 2, the Matchings Connecivity matrix H_t is a matrix that has rows and columns both labeled by all perfect matchings of the complete graph K_t on t vertices; an entry H_t[M_1,M_2] is 1 if M_1\cup M_2 is a Hamiltonian cycle and 0 otherwise. Motivated by the computational study of the Hamiltonicity problem, we present three results on the structure of H_t: We first show that H_t has rank at most 2^{t/2-1} over GF(2) via an appropriate factorization that explicitly provides families of matchings X_t forming bases for H_t. Second, we show how to quickly change representation between such bases. Third, we notice that the sets of matchings X_t induce permutation matrices within H_t. Subsequently, we use the factorization to obtain an 1.888^n n^{O(1)} time Monte Carlo algorithm that solves the Hamiltonicity problem in directed bipartite graphs. Our algorithm as well counts the number of Hamiltonian cycles modulo two in directed bipartite or undirected graphs in the same time bound. Moreover, we use the fast basis change algorithm from the second result to present a Monte Carlo algorithm that given an undirected graph on n vertices along with a path decomposition of width at most pw decides Hamiltonicity in (2+\sqrt{2})^{pw}n^{O(1)} time. Finally, we use the third result to show that for every ε>0 this cannot be improved to (2+\sqrt{2}-ε)^{pw}n^{O(1)} time unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, i.e., a faster algorithm for this problem would imply the breakthrough result of a (2-ε)^n time algorithm for CNF-Sat.
The MULTICUT problem, given a graph G, a set of terminal pairs T={(s_i,t_i) | 1 <= i <= r} and an integer p, asks whether one can find a cutset consisting of at most p non-terminal vertices that separates all the terminal pairs, i.e., after removing the cutset, t_i is not reachable from s_i for each 1 <= i <= r. The fixed-parameter tractability of MULTICUT in undirected graphs, parameterized by the size of the cutset only, has been recently proven by Marx and Razgon (STOC'11) and, independently, by Bousquet et al. (STOC'11), after resisting attacks as a long-standing open problem. In this paper we prove that MULTICUT is fixed-parameter tractable on directed acyclic graphs, when parameterized both by the size of the cutset and the number of terminal pairs. We complement this result by showing that this is implausible for parameterization by the size of the cutset only, as this version of the problem remains W[1]-hard.
We study the complexity of the Graph Isomorphism problem on graph classes that are characterized by a finite number of forbidden induced subgraphs, focusing mostly on the case of two forbidden subgraphs. We show hardness results and develop techniques for the structural analysis of such graph classes, which applied to the case of two forbidden subgraphs give the following results: A dichotomy into isomorphism complete and polynomial-time solvable graph classes for all but finitely many cases, whenever neither of the forbidden graphs is a clique, a pan, or a complement of these graphs. Further reducing the remaining open cases we show that (with respect to graph isomorphism) forbidding a pan is equivalent to forbidding a clique of size three.
Assuming the AND-distillation conjecture, the Pathwidth problem of determining whether a given graph G has pathwidth at most k admits no polynomial kernelization with respect to k. The present work studies the existence of polynomial kernels for Pathwidth with respect to other, structural, parameters. Our main result is that, unless NP is in coNP/poly, Pathwidth admits no polynomial kernelization even when parameterized by the vertex deletion distance to a clique, by giving a cross-composition from Cutwidth. The cross-composition works also for Treewidth, improving over previous lower bounds by the present authors. For Pathwidth, our result rules out polynomial kernels with respect to the distance to various classes of polynomial-time solvable inputs, like interval or cluster graphs. This leads to the question whether there are nontrivial structural parameters for which Pathwidth does admit a polynomial kernelization. To answer this, we give a collection of graph reduction rules that are safe for Pathwidth. We analyze the success of these results and obtain polynomial kernelizations with respect to the following parameters: the size of a vertex cover of the graph, the vertex deletion distance to a graph where each connected component is a star, and the vertex deletion distance to a graph where each connected component has at most c vertices.
We introduce the cross-composition framework for proving kernelization lower bounds. A classical problem L AND/OR-cross-composes into a parameterized problem Q if it is possible to efficiently construct an instance of Q with polynomially bounded parameter value that expresses the logical AND or OR of a sequence of instances of L. Building on work by Bodlaender et al. (ICALP 2008) and using a result by Fortnow and Santhanam (STOC 2008) with a refinement by Dell and van Melkebeek (STOC 2010), we show that if an NP-hard problem OR-cross-composes into a parameterized problem Q then Q does not admit a polynomial kernel unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses. Similarly, an AND-cross-composition for Q rules out polynomial kernels for Q under Bodlaender et al.'s AND-distillation conjecture. Our technique generalizes and strengthens the recent techniques of using composition algorithms and of transferring the lower bounds via polynomial parameter transformations. We show its applicability by proving kernelization lower bounds for a number of important graphs problems with structural (non-standard) parameterizations, e.g., Clique, Chromatic Number, Weighted Feedback Vertex Set, and Weighted Odd Cycle Transversal do not admit polynomial kernels with respect to the vertex cover number of the input graphs unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses, contrasting the fact that these problems are trivially fixed-parameter tractable for this parameter. After learning of our results, several teams of authors have successfully applied the cross-composition framework to different parameterized problems. For completeness, our presentation of the framework includes several extensions based on this follow-up work. For example, we show how a relaxed version of OR-cross-compositions may be used to give lower bounds on the degree of the polynomial in the kernel size.
The existence of a polynomial kernel for Odd Cycle Transversal was a notorious open problem in parameterized complexity. Recently, this was settled by the present authors (Kratsch and Wahlström, SODA 2012), with a randomized polynomial kernel for the problem, using matroid theory to encode flow questions over a set of terminals in size polynomial in the number of terminals. In the current work we further establish the usefulness of matroid theory to kernelization by showing applications of a result on representative sets due to Lovász (Combinatorial Surveys 1977) and Marx (TCS 2009). We show how representative sets can be used to give a polynomial kernel for the elusive Almost 2-SAT problem. We further apply the representative sets tool to the problem of finding irrelevant vertices in graph cut problems, i.e., vertices which can be made undeletable without affecting the status of the problem. This gives the first significant progress towards a polynomial kernel for the Multiway Cut problem; in particular, we get a kernel of O(k^{s+1}) vertices for Multiway Cut instances with at most s terminals. Both these kernelization results have significant spin-off effects, producing the first polynomial kernels for a range of related problems. More generally, the irrelevant vertex results have implications for covering min-cuts in graphs. For a directed graph G=(V,E) and sets S, T \subseteq V, let r be the size of a minimum (S,T)-vertex cut (which may intersect S and T). We can find a set Z \subseteq V of size O(|S|*|T|*r) which contains a minimum (A,B)-vertex cut for every A \subseteq S, B \subseteq T. Similarly, for an undirected graph G=(V,E), a set of terminals X \subseteq V, and a constant s, we can find a set Z\subseteq V of size O(|X|^{s+1}) which contains a minimum multiway cut for any partition of X into at most s pairwise disjoint subsets.
It is well known that many local graph problems, like Vertex Cover and Dominating Set, can be solved in 2^{O(tw)}|V|^{O(1)} time for graphs G=(V,E) with a given tree decomposition of width tw. However, for nonlocal problems, like the fundamental class of connectivity problems, for a long time we did not know how to do this faster than tw^{O(tw)}|V|^{O(1)}. Recently, Cygan et al. (FOCS 2011) presented Monte Carlo algorithms for a wide range of connectivity problems running in time $c^{tw}|V|^{O(1)} for a small constant c, e.g., for Hamiltonian Cycle and Steiner tree. Naturally, this raises the question whether randomization is necessary to achieve this runtime; furthermore, it is desirable to also solve counting and weighted versions (the latter without incurring a pseudo-polynomial cost in terms of the weights). We present two new approaches rooted in linear algebra, based on matrix rank and determinants, which provide deterministic c^{tw}|V|^{O(1)} time algorithms, also for weighted and counting versions. For example, in this time we can solve the traveling salesman problem or count the number of Hamiltonian cycles. The rank-based ideas provide a rather general approach for speeding up even straightforward dynamic programming formulations by identifying "small" sets of representative partial solutions; we focus on the case of expressing connectivity via sets of partitions, but the essential ideas should have further applications. The determinant-based approach uses the matrix tree theorem for deriving closed formulas for counting versions of connectivity problems; we show how to evaluate those formulas via dynamic programming.
The field of kernelization studies polynomial-time preprocessing routines for hard problems in the framework of parameterized complexity. Although a framework for proving kernelization lower bounds has been discovered in 2008 and successfully applied multiple times over the last three years, establishing kernelization complexity of many important problems remains open. In this paper we show that, unless NP is a subset of coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses up to its third level, the following parameterized problems do not admit a polynomial-time preprocessing algorithm that reduces the size of an instance to polynomial in the parameter: - EDGE CLIQUE COVER, parameterized by the number of cliques, - DIRECTED EDGE/VERTEX MULTIWAY CUT, parameterized by the size of the cutset, even in the case of two terminals, - EDGE/VERTEX MULTICUT, parameterized by the size of the cutset, and - k-WAY CUT, parameterized by the size of the cutset. The existence of a polynomial kernelization for EDGE CLIQUE COVER was a seasoned veteran in open problem sessions. Furthermore, our results complement very recent developments in designing parameterized algorithms for cut problems by Marx and Razgon [STOC'11], Bousquet et al. [STOC'11], Kawarabayashi and Thorup [FOCS'11] and Chitnis et al. [SODA'12].
Until recently, techniques for obtaining lower bounds for kernelization were one of the most sought after tools in the field of parameterized complexity. Now, after a strong influx of techniques, we are in the fortunate situation of having tools available that are even stronger than what has been required in their applications so far. Based on a result of Fortnow and Santhanam (JCSS 2011), Bodlaender et al. (JCSS 2009) showed that, unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly, the existence of a deterministic polynomial-time composition algorithm, i.e., an algorithm which outputs an instance of bounded parameter value which is yes if and only if one of t input instances is yes, rules out the existence of polynomial kernels for a problem. Dell and van Melkebeek (STOC 2010) continued this line of research and, amongst others, were able to rule out kernels of size O(k^d-eps) for certain problems, assuming NP !\subseteq coNP/poly. Their work implies that even the existence of a co-nondeterministic composition rules out polynomial kernels. In this work we present the first example of how co-nondeterminism can help to make a composition algorithm. We study a Ramsey-type problem: Given a graph G and an integer k, the question is whether G contains an independent set or a clique of size at least k. It was asked by Rod Downey whether this problem admits a polynomial kernelization. We provide a co-nondeterministic composition based on embedding t instances into a single host graph H. The crux is that the host graph H needs to observe a bound of L \in O(log t) on both its maximum independent set and maximum clique size, while also having a cover of its vertex set by independent sets and cliques all of size L; the co-nondeterministic composition is build around the search for such graphs. Thus we show that, unless NP \subseteq coNP/poly, the problem does not admit a kernelization with polynomial size guarantee.
The Odd Cycle Transversal problem (OCT) asks whether a given graph can be made bipartite by deleting at most $k$ of its vertices. In a breakthrough result Reed, Smith, and Vetta (Operations Research Letters, 2004) gave a $\BigOh(4^kkmn)$ time algorithm for it, the first algorithm with polynomial runtime of uniform degree for every fixed $k$. It is known that this implies a polynomial-time compression algorithm that turns OCT instances into equivalent instances of size at most $\BigOh(4^k)$, a so-called kernelization. Since then the existence of a polynomial kernel for OCT, i.e., a kernelization with size bounded polynomially in $k$, has turned into one of the main open questions in the study of kernelization. This work provides the first (randomized) polynomial kernelization for OCT. We introduce a novel kernelization approach based on matroid theory, where we encode all relevant information about a problem instance into a matroid with a representation of size polynomial in $k$. For OCT, the matroid is built to allow us to simulate the computation of the iterative compression step of the algorithm of Reed, Smith, and Vetta, applied (for only one round) to an approximate odd cycle transversal which it is aiming to shrink to size $k$. The process is randomized with one-sided error exponentially small in $k$, where the result can contain false positives but no false negatives, and the size guarantee is cubic in the size of the approximate solution. Combined with an $\BigOh(\sqrt{\log n})$-approximation (Agarwal et al., STOC 2005), we get a reduction of the instance to size $\BigOh(k^{4.5})$, implying a randomized polynomial kernelization.
The framework of Bodlaender et al. (ICALP 2008) and Fortnow and Santhanam (STOC 2008) allows us to exclude the existence of polynomial kernels for a range of problems under reasonable complexity-theoretical assumptions. However, there are also some issues that are not addressed by this framework, including the existence of Turing kernels such as the "kernelization" of Leaf Out Branching(k) into a disjunction over n instances of size poly(k). Observing that Turing kernels are preserved by polynomial parametric transformations, we define a kernelization hardness hierarchy, akin to the M- and W-hierarchy of ordinary parameterized complexity, by the PPT-closure of problems that seem likely to be fundamentally hard for efficient Turing kernelization. We find that several previously considered problems are complete for our fundamental hardness class, including Min Ones d-SAT(k), Binary NDTM Halting(k), Connected Vertex Cover(k), and Clique(k log n), the clique problem parameterized by k log n.
Connectivity problems like k-Path and k-Disjoint Paths relate to many important milestones in parameterized complexity, namely the Graph Minors Project, color coding, and the recent development of techniques for obtaining kernelization lower bounds. This work explores the existence of polynomial kernels for various path and cycle problems, by considering nonstandard parameterizations. We show polynomial kernels when the parameters are a given vertex cover, a modulator to a cluster graph, or a (promised) max leaf number. We obtain lower bounds via cross-composition, e.g., for Hamiltonian Cycle and related problems when parameterized by a modulator to an outerplanar graph.
The Odd Cycle Transversal problem (OCT) asks whether a given graph can be made bipartite (i.e., 2-colorable) by deleting at most l vertices. We study structural parameterizations of OCT with respect to their polynomial kernelizability, i.e., whether instances can be efficiently reduced to a size polynomial in the chosen parameter. It is a major open problem in parameterized complexity whether Odd Cycle Transversal admits a polynomial kernel when parameterized by l. On the positive side, we show a polynomial kernel for OCT when parameterized by the vertex deletion distance to the class of bipartite graphs of treewidth at most w (for any constant w); this generalizes the parameter feedback vertex set number (i.e., the distance to a forest). Complementing this, we exclude polynomial kernels for OCT parameterized by the distance to outerplanar graphs, conditioned on the assumption that NP \not \subseteq coNP/poly. Thus the bipartiteness requirement for the treewidth w graphs is necessary. Further lower bounds are given for parameterization by distance from cluster and co-cluster graphs respectively, as well as for Weighted OCT parameterized by the vertex cover number (i.e., the distance from an independent set).
It has been observed in many places that constant-factor approximable problems often admit polynomial or even linear problem kernels for their decision versions, e.g., Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, and Triangle Packing. While there exist examples like Bin Packing, which does not admit any kernel unless P = NP, there apparently is a strong relation between these two polynomial-time techniques. We add to this picture by showing that the natural decision versions of all problems in two prominent classes of constant-factor approximable problems, namely MIN F^+Π_1 and MAX NP, admit polynomial problem kernels. Problems in MAX SNP, a subclass of MAX NP, are shown to admit kernels with a linear base set, e.g., the set of vertices of a graph. This extends results of Cai and Chen (JCSS 1997), stating that the standard parameterizations of problems in MAX SNP and MIN F^+Π_1 are fixed-parameter tractable, and complements recent research on problems that do not admit polynomial kernelizations (Bodlaender et al. JCSS 2009).
We introduce a new technique for proving kernelization lower bounds, called cross-composition. A classical problem L cross-composes into a parameterized problem Q if an instance of Q with polynomially bounded parameter value can express the logical OR of a sequence of instances of L. Building on work by Bodlaender et al. (ICALP 2008) and using a result by Fortnow and Santhanam (STOC 2008) we show that if an NP-complete problem cross-composes into a parameterized problem Q then Q does not admit a polynomial kernel unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses. Our technique generalizes and strengthens the recent techniques of using OR-composition algorithms and of transferring the lower bounds via polynomial parameter transformations. We show its applicability by proving kernelization lower bounds for a number of important graphs problems with structural (non-standard) parameterizations, e.g., Chromatic Number, Clique, and Weighted Feedback Vertex Set do not admit polynomial kernels with respect to the vertex cover number of the input graphs unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses, contrasting the fact that these problems are trivially fixed-parameter tractable for this parameter. We have similar lower bounds for Feedback Vertex Set.
We study the computation of Nash equilibria in a two-player normal form game from the perspective of parameterized complexity. Recent results proved hardness for a number of variants, when parameterized by the support size. We complement those results, by identifying three cases in which the problem becomes fixed-parameter tractable. These cases occur in the previously studied settings of sparse games and unbalanced games as well as in the newly considered case of locally bounded treewidth games that generalizes both these two cases.