BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Marcin Pilipczuk appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
We prove that for every fixed integer $s$ and every planar graph $H$, the class of $H$-induced-minor-free and $K_{1,s}$-induced-subgraph-free graphs has polylogarithmic tree-independence number. This is a weakening of a conjecture of Dallard, Krnc, Kwon, Milanič, Munaro, Štorgel, and Wiederrecht.
Twin-width is a newly introduced graph width parameter that aims at generalizing a wide range of "nicely structured" graph classes. In this work, we focus on obtaining good bounds on twin-width $\text{tww}(G)$ for graphs $G$ from a number of classic graph classes. We prove the following: - $\text{tww}(G) \leq 3\cdot 2^{\text{tw}(G)-1}$, where $\text{tw}(G)$ is the treewidth of $G$, - $\text{tww}(G) \leq \max(4\text{bw}(G),\frac{9}{2}\text{bw}(G)-3)$ for a planar graph $G$ with $\text{bw}(G) \geq 2$, where $\text{bw}(G)$ is the branchwidth of $G$, - $\text{tww}(G) \leq 183$ for a planar graph $G$, - the twin-width of a universal bipartite graph $(X,2^X,E)$ with $|X|=n$ is $n - \log_2(n) + \mathcal{O}(1)$ . An important idea behind the bounds for planar graphs is to use an embedding of the graph and sphere-cut decompositions to obtain good bounds on neighbourhood complexity.
A decision tree recursively splits a feature space $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ and then assigns class labels based on the resulting partition. Decision trees have been part of the basic machine-learning toolkit for decades. A large body of work treats heuristic algorithms to compute a decision tree from training data, usually aiming to minimize in particular the size of the resulting tree. In contrast, little is known about the complexity of the underlying computational problem of computing a minimum-size tree for the given training data. We study this problem with respect to the number $d$ of dimensions of the feature space. We show that it can be solved in $O(n^{2d + 1}d)$ time, but under reasonable complexity-theoretic assumptions it is not possible to achieve $f(d) \cdot n^{o(d / \log d)}$ running time, where $n$ is the number of training examples. The problem is solvable in $(dR)^{O(dR)} \cdot n^{1+o(1)}$ time, if there are exactly two classes and $R$ is an upper bound on the number of tree leaves labeled with the first~class.
For an integer $t$, a graph $G$ is called {\em{$C_{>t}$-free}} if $G$ does not contain any induced cycle on more than~$t$ vertices. We prove the following statement: for every pair of integers $d$ and $t$ and a CMSO$_2$ statement~$ϕ$, there exists an algorithm that, given an $n$-vertex $C_{>t}$-free graph $G$ with weights on vertices, finds in time $n^{O(\log^4 n)}$ a maximum-weight vertex subset $S$ such that $G[S]$ has degeneracy at most $d$ and satisfies $ϕ$. The running time can be improved to $n^{O(\log^2 n)}$ assuming $G$ is $P_t$-free, that is, $G$ does not contain an induced path on $t$ vertices. This expands the recent results of the authors [to appear at FOCS 2020 and SOSA 2021] on the {\sc{Maximum Weight Independent Set}} problem on $P_t$-free graphs in two directions: by encompassing the more general setting of $C_{>t}$-free graphs, and by being applicable to a much wider variety of problems, such as {\sc{Maximum Weight Induced Forest}} or {\sc{Maximum Weight Induced Planar Graph}}.
The Metric Dimension problem asks for a minimum-sized resolving set in a given (unweighted, undirected) graph $G$. Here, a set $S \subseteq V(G)$ is resolving if no two distinct vertices of $G$ have the same distance vector to $S$. The complexity of Metric Dimension in graphs of bounded treewidth remained elusive in the past years. Recently, Bonnet and Purohit [IPEC 2019] showed that the problem is W[1]-hard under treewidth parameterization. In this work, we strengthen their lower bound to show that Metric Dimension is NP-hard in graphs of treewidth 24.
We study the Independent Feedback Vertex Set problem - a variant of the classic Feedback Vertex Set problem where, given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, the problem is to decide whether there exists a vertex set $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that $G\setminus S$ is a forest and $S$ is an independent set of size at most $k$. We present an $O^\ast((1+φ^{2})^{k})$-time FPT algorithm for this problem, where $φ<1.619$ is the golden ratio, improving the previous fastest $O^\ast(4.1481^{k})$-time algorithm given by Agrawal et al [IPEC 2016]. The exponential factor in our time complexity bound matches the fastest deterministic FPT algorithm for the classic Feedback Vertex Set problem. On the technical side, the main novelty is a refined measure of an input instance in a branching process, that allows for a simpler and more concise description and analysis of the algorithm.
A graph is called $P_t$-free} if it does not contain a $t$-vertex path as an induced subgraph. While $P_4$-free graphs are exactly cographs, the structure of $P_t$-free graphs for $t \geq 5$ remains little understood. On one hand, classic computational problems such as Maximum Weight Independent Set (MWIS) and $3$-Coloring are not known to be NP-hard on $P_t$-free graphs for any fixed $t$. On the other hand, despite significant effort, polynomial-time algorithms for MWIS in $P_6$-free graphs~[SODA 2019] and $3$-Coloring in $P_7$-free graphs~[Combinatorica 2018] have been found only recently. In both cases, the algorithms rely on deep structural insights into the considered graph classes. One of the main tools in the algorithms for MWIS in $P_5$-free graphs~[SODA 2014] and in $P_6$-free graphs~[SODA 2019] is the so-called Separator Covering Lemma that asserts that every minimal separator in the graph can be covered by the union of neighborhoods of a constant number of vertices. In this note we show that such a statement generalizes to $P_7$-free graphs and is false in $P_8$-free graphs. We also discuss analogues of such a statement for covering potential maximal cliques with unions of neighborhoods.
We present a data structure that in a dynamic graph of treedepth at most $d$, which is modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, maintains an optimum-height elimination forest. The data structure achieves worst-case update time $2^{{\cal O}(d^2)}$, which matches the best known parameter dependency in the running time of a static fpt algorithm for computing the treedepth of a graph. This improves a result of Dvořák et al. [ESA 2014], who for the same problem achieved update time $f(d)$ for some non-elementary (i.e. tower-exponential) function $f$. As a by-product, we improve known upper bounds on the sizes of minimal obstructions for having treedepth $d$ from doubly-exponential in $d$ to $d^{{\cal O}(d)}$. As applications, we design new fully dynamic parameterized data structures for detecting long paths and cycles in general graphs. More precisely, for a fixed parameter $k$ and a dynamic graph $G$, modified over time by edge insertions and deletions, our data structures maintain answers to the following queries: - Does $G$ contain a simple path on $k$ vertices? - Does $G$ contain a simple cycle on at least $k$ vertices? In the first case, the data structure achieves amortized update time $2^{{\cal O}(k^2)}$. In the second case, the amortized update time is $2^{{\cal O}(k^4)} + {\cal O}(k \log n)$. In both cases we assume access to a dictionary on the edges of $G$.
A hole in a graph is an induced cycle of length at least 4. A hole is long if its length is at least 5. By $P_t$ we denote a path on $t$ vertices. In this paper we give polynomial-time algorithms for the following problems: the Maximum Weight Independent Set problem in long-hole-free graphs, and the Feedback Vertex Set problem in $P_5$-free graphs. Each of the above results resolves a corresponding long-standing open problem. An extended $C_5$ is a five-vertex hole with an additional vertex adjacent to one or two consecutive vertices of the hole. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be the class of graphs excluding an extended $C_5$ and holes of length at least $6$ as induced subgraphs; $\mathcal{C}$ contains all long-hole-free graphs and all $P_5$-free graphs. We show that, given an $n$-vertex graph $G \in \mathcal{C}$ with vertex weights and an integer $k$, one can in time $n^{\Oh(k)}$ find a maximum-weight induced subgraph of $G$ of treewidth less than $k$. This implies both aforementioned results.
A hole in a graph is an induced cycle of length at least $4$, and an antihole is the complement of an induced cycle of length at least $4$. A hole or antihole is long if its length is at least $5$. For an integer $k$, the $k$-prism is the graph consisting of two cliques of size $k$ joined by a matching. The complexity of Maximum (Weight) Independent Set (MWIS) in long-hole-free graphs remains an important open problem. In this paper we give a polynomial time algorithm to solve MWIS in long-hole-free graphs with no $k$-prism (for any fixed integer $k$), and a subexponential algorithm for MWIS in long-hole-free graphs in general. As a special case this gives a polynomial time algorithm to find a maximum weight clique in perfect graphs with no long antihole, and no hole of length $6$. The algorithms use the framework of minimal chordal completions and potential maximal cliques.
In the classic Maximum Weight Independent Set problem we are given a graph $G$ with a nonnegative weight function on vertices, and the goal is to find an independent set in $G$ of maximum possible weight. While the problem is NP-hard in general, we give a polynomial-time algorithm working on any $P_6$-free graph, that is, a graph that has no path on $6$ vertices as an induced subgraph. This improves the polynomial-time algorithm on $P_5$-free graphs of Lokshtanov et al. (SODA 2014), and the quasipolynomial-time algorithm on $P_6$-free graphs of Lokshtanov et al (SODA 2016). The main technical contribution leading to our main result is enumeration of a polynomial-size family $\mathcal{F}$ of vertex subsets with the following property: for every maximal independent set $I$ in the graph, $\mathcal{F}$ contains all maximal cliques of some minimal chordal completion of $G$ that does not add any edge incident to a vertex of $I$.
The Chordal Vertex Deletion (ChVD) problem asks to delete a minimum number of vertices from an input graph to obtain a chordal graph. In this paper we develop a polynomial kernel for ChVD under the parameterization by the solution size, as well as poly(opt) approximation algorithm. The first result answers an open problem of Marx from 2006 [WG 2006, LNCS 4271, 37-48].
We introduce a new technique for designing fixed-parameter algorithms for cut problems, namely randomized contractions. We apply our framework to obtain the first FPT algorithm for the Unique Label Cover problem and new FPT algorithms with exponential speed up for the Steiner Cut and Node Multiway Cut-Uncut problems. More precisely, we show the following: - We prove that the parameterized version of the Unique Label Cover problem, which is the base of the Unique Games Conjecture, can be solved in 2^{O(k^2\log |Σ|)}n^4\log n deterministic time (even in the stronger, vertex-deletion variant) where k is the number of unsatisfied edges and |Σ| is the size of the alphabet. As a consequence, we show that one can in polynomial time solve instances of Unique Games where the number of edges allowed not to be satisfied is upper bounded by O(\sqrt{\log n}) to optimality, which improves over the trivial O(1) upper bound. - We prove that the Steiner Cut problem can be solved in 2^{O(k^2\log k)}n^4\log n deterministic time and \tilde{O}(2^{O(k^2\log k)}n^2) randomized time where k is the size of the cutset. This result improves the double exponential running time of the recent work of Kawarabayashi and Thorup (FOCS'11). - We show how to combine considering `cut' and `uncut' constraints at the same time. More precisely, we define a robust problem Node Multiway Cut-Uncut that can serve as an abstraction of introducing uncut constraints, and show that it admits an algorithm running in 2^{O(k^2\log k)}n^4\log n deterministic time where k is the size of the cutset. To the best of our knowledge, the only known way of tackling uncut constraints was via the approach of Marx, O'Sullivan and Razgon (STACS'10), which yields algorithms with double exponential running time. An interesting aspect of our technique is that, unlike important separators, it can handle real weights.
Strip packing is a classical packing problem, where the goal is to pack a set of rectangular objects into a strip of a given width, while minimizing the total height of the packing. The problem has multiple applications, e.g. in scheduling and stock-cutting, and has been studied extensively. When the dimensions of objects are allowed to be exponential in the total input size, it is known that the problem cannot be approximated within a factor better than $3/2$, unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$. However, there was no corresponding lower bound for polynomially bounded input data. In fact, Nadiradze and Wiese [SODA 2016] have recently proposed a $(1.4 + ε)$ approximation algorithm for this variant, thus showing that strip packing with polynomially bounded data can be approximated better than when exponentially large values in the input data are allowed. Their result has subsequently been improved to a $(4/3 + ε)$ approximation by two independent research groups [FSTTCS 2016, arXiv:1610.04430]. This raises a question whether strip packing with polynomially bounded input data admits a quasi-polynomial time approximation scheme, as is the case for related two-dimensional packing problems like maximum independent set of rectangles or two-dimensional knapsack. In this paper we answer this question in negative by proving that it is NP-hard to approximate strip packing within a factor better than $12/11$, even when admitting only polynomially bounded input data. In particular, this shows that the strip packing problem admits no quasi-polynomial time approximation scheme, unless $\mathrm{NP} \subseteq \mathrm{DTIME}(2^{\mathrm{polylog}(n)})$.
We show that for a number of parameterized problems for which only $2^{O(k)} n^{O(1)}$ time algorithms are known on general graphs, subexponential parameterized algorithms with running time $2^{O(k^{1-\frac{1}{1+δ}} \log^2 k)} n^{O(1)}$ are possible for graphs of polynomial growth with growth rate (degree) $δ$, that is, if we assume that every ball of radius $r$ contains only $O(r^δ)$ vertices. The algorithms use the technique of low-treewidth pattern covering, introduced by Fomin et al. [FOCS 2016] for planar graphs; here we show how this strategy can be made to work for graphs with polynomial growth. Formally, we prove that, given a graph $G$ of polynomial growth with growth rate $δ$ and an integer $k$, one can in randomized polynomial time find a subset $A \subseteq V(G)$ such that on one hand the treewidth of $G[A]$ is $O(k^{1-\frac{1}{1+δ}} \log k)$, and on the other hand for every set $X \subseteq V(G)$ of size at most $k$, the probability that $X \subseteq A$ is $2^{-O(k^{1-\frac{1}{1+δ}} \log^2 k)}$. Together with standard dynamic programming techniques on graphs of bounded treewidth, this statement gives subexponential parameterized algorithms for a number of subgraph search problems, such as Long Path or Steiner Tree, in graphs of polynomial growth. We complement the algorithm with an almost tight lower bound for Long Path: unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, no parameterized algorithm with running time $2^{k^{1-\frac{1}δ-\varepsilon}}n^{O(1)}$ is possible for any $\varepsilon > 0$ and an integer $δ\geq 3$.
We prove the following theorem. Given a planar graph $G$ and an integer $k$, it is possible in polynomial time to randomly sample a subset $A$ of vertices of $G$ with the following properties: (i) $A$ induces a subgraph of $G$ of treewidth $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{k}\log k)$, and (ii) for every connected subgraph $H$ of $G$ on at most $k$ vertices, the probability that $A$ covers the whole vertex set of $H$ is at least $(2^{\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{k}\log^2 k)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)})^{-1}$, where $n$ is the number of vertices of $G$. Together with standard dynamic programming techniques for graphs of bounded treewidth, this result gives a versatile technique for obtaining (randomized) subexponential parameterized algorithms for problems on planar graphs, usually with running time bound $2^{\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{k} \log^2 k)} n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$. The technique can be applied to problems expressible as searching for a small, connected pattern with a prescribed property in a large host graph, examples of such problems include Directed $k$-Path, Weighted $k$-Path, Vertex Cover Local Search, and Subgraph Isomorphism, among others. Up to this point, it was open whether these problems can be solved in subexponential parameterized time on planar graphs, because they are not amenable to the classic technique of bidimensionality. Furthermore, all our results hold in fact on any class of graphs that exclude a fixed apex graph as a minor, in particular on graphs embeddable in any fixed surface.
In this paper we study the Steiner tree problem over a dynamic set of terminals. We consider the model where we are given an $n$-vertex graph $G=(V,E,w)$ with positive real edge weights, and our goal is to maintain a tree which is a good approximation of the minimum Steiner tree spanning a terminal set $S \subseteq V$, which changes over time. The changes applied to the terminal set are either terminal additions (incremental scenario), terminal removals (decremental scenario), or both (fully dynamic scenario). Our task here is twofold. We want to support updates in sublinear $o(n)$ time, and keep the approximation factor of the algorithm as small as possible. We show that we can maintain a $(6+\varepsilon)$-approximate Steiner tree of a general graph in $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n} \log D)$ time per terminal addition or removal. Here, $D$ denotes the stretch of the metric induced by $G$. For planar graphs we achieve the same running time and the approximation ratio of $(2+\varepsilon)$. Moreover, we show faster algorithms for incremental and decremental scenarios. Finally, we show that if we allow higher approximation ratio, even more efficient algorithms are possible. In particular we show a polylogarithmic time $(4+\varepsilon)$-approximate algorithm for planar graphs. One of the main building blocks of our algorithms are dynamic distance oracles for vertex-labeled graphs, which are of independent interest. We also improve and use the online algorithms for the Steiner tree problem.
In the Vertex Planarization problem one asks to delete the minimum possible number of vertices from an input graph to obtain a planar graph. The parameterized complexity of this problem, parameterized by the solution size (the number of deleted vertices) has recently attracted significant attention. The state-of-the-art algorithm of Jansen, Lokshtanov, and Saurabh [SODA 2014] runs in time $2^{O(k \log k)} \cdot n$ on $n$-vertex graph with a solution of size $k$. It remains open if one can obtain a single-exponential dependency on $k$ in the running time bound. One of the core technical contributions of the work of Jansen, Lokshtanov, and Saurabh is an algorithm that solves a weighted variant of Vertex Planarization in time $2^{O(w \log w)} \cdot n$ on graphs of treewidth $w$. In this short note we prove that the running time of this routine is tight under the Exponential Time Hypothesis, even in unweighted graphs and when parameterizing by treedepth. Consequently, it is unlikely that a potential single-exponential algorithm for Vertex Planarization parameterized by the solution size can be obtained by merely improving upon the aforementioned bounded treewidth subroutine.
The celebrated Erdos-Hajnal conjecture states that for every $n$-vertex undirected graph $H$ there exists $\eps(H)>0$ such that every graph $G$ that does not contain $H$ as an induced subgraph contains a clique or an independent set of size at least $n^{\eps(H)}$. A weaker version of the conjecture states that the polynomial-size clique/independent set phenomenon occurs if one excludes both $H$ and its complement $H^{\compl}$. We show that the weaker conjecture holds if $H$ is any path with a pendant edge at its third vertex; thus we give a new infinite family of graphs for which the conjecture holds.
In the Independent set problem, the input is a graph $G$, every vertex has a non-negative integer weight, and the task is to find a set $S$ of pairwise non-adjacent vertices, maximizing the total weight of the vertices in $S$. We give an $n^{O (\log^2 n)}$ time algorithm for this problem on graphs excluding the path $P_6$ on $6$ vertices as an induced subgraph. Currently, there is no constant $k$ known for which Independent Set on $P_{k}$-free graphs becomes NP-complete, and our result implies that if such a $k$ exists, then $k > 6$ unless all problems in NP can be decided in (quasi)polynomial time. Using the combinatorial tools that we develop for the above algorithm, we also give a polynomial-time algorithm for Efficient Dominating Set on $P_6$-free graphs. In this problem, the input is a graph $G$, every vertex has an integer weight, and the objective is to find a set $S$ of maximum weight such that every vertex in $G$ has exactly one vertex in $S$ in its closed neighborhood, or to determine that no such set exists. Prior to our work, the class of $P_6$-free graphs was the only class of graphs defined by a single forbidden induced subgraph on which the computational complexity of Efficient Dominating Set was unknown.
We prove that for every positive integer $r$ and for every graph class $\mathcal G$ of bounded expansion, the $r$-Dominating Set problem admits a linear kernel on graphs from $\mathcal G$. Moreover, when $\mathcal G$ is only assumed to be nowhere dense, then we give an almost linear kernel on $\mathcal G$ for the classic Dominating Set problem, i.e., for the case $r=1$. These results generalize a line of previous research on finding linear kernels for Dominating Set and $r$-Dominating Set. However, the approach taken in this work, which is based on the theory of sparse graphs, is radically different and conceptually much simpler than the previous approaches. We complement our findings by showing that for the closely related Connected Dominating Set problem, the existence of such kernelization algorithms is unlikely, even though the problem is known to admit a linear kernel on $H$-topological-minor-free graphs. Also, we prove that for any somewhere dense class $\mathcal G$, there is some $r$ for which $r$-Dominating Set is W[$2$]-hard on $\mathcal G$. Thus, our results fall short of proving a sharp dichotomy for the parameterized complexity of $r$-Dominating Set on subgraph-monotone graph classes: we conjecture that the border of tractability lies exactly between nowhere dense and somewhere dense graph classes.
In the Closest String problem one is given a family $\mathcal S$ of equal-length strings over some fixed alphabet, and the task is to find a string $y$ that minimizes the maximum Hamming distance between $y$ and a string from $\mathcal S$. While polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTASes) for this problem are known for a long time [Li et al., J. ACM'02], no efficient polynomial-time approximation scheme (EPTAS) has been proposed so far. In this paper, we prove that the existence of an EPTAS for Closest String is in fact unlikely, as it would imply that $\mathrm{FPT}=\mathrm{W}[1]$, a highly unexpected collapse in the hierarchy of parameterized complexity classes. Our proof also shows that the existence of a PTAS for Closest String with running time $f(\varepsilon)\cdot n^{o(1/\varepsilon)}$, for any computable function $f$, would contradict the Exponential Time Hypothesis.
We study the problem of routing on disjoint paths in bounded treewidth graphs with both edge and node capacities. The input consists of a capacitated graph $G$ and a collection of $k$ source-destination pairs $\mathcal{M} = \{(s_1, t_1), \dots, (s_k, t_k)\}$. The goal is to maximize the number of pairs that can be routed subject to the capacities in the graph. A routing of a subset $\mathcal{M}'$ of the pairs is a collection $\mathcal{P}$ of paths such that, for each pair $(s_i, t_i) \in \mathcal{M}'$, there is a path in $\mathcal{P}$ connecting $s_i$ to $t_i$. In the Maximum Edge Disjoint Paths (MaxEDP) problem, the graph $G$ has capacities $\mathrm{cap}(e)$ on the edges and a routing $\mathcal{P}$ is feasible if each edge $e$ is in at most $\mathrm{cap}(e)$ of the paths of $\mathcal{P}$. The Maximum Node Disjoint Paths (MaxNDP) problem is the node-capacitated counterpart of MaxEDP. In this paper we obtain an $O(r^3)$ approximation for MaxEDP on graphs of treewidth at most $r$ and a matching approximation for MaxNDP on graphs of pathwidth at most $r$. Our results build on and significantly improve the work by Chekuri et al. [ICALP 2013] who obtained an $O(r \cdot 3^r)$ approximation for MaxEDP.
A graph is called (claw,diamond)-free if it contains neither a claw (a $K_{1,3}$) nor a diamond (a $K_4$ with an edge removed) as an induced subgraph. Equivalently, (claw,diamond)-free graphs can be characterized as line graphs of triangle-free graphs, or as linear dominoes, i.e., graphs in which every vertex is in at most two maximal cliques and every edge is in exactly one maximal clique. In this paper we consider the parameterized complexity of the (claw,diamond)-free Edge Deletion problem, where given a graph $G$ and a parameter $k$, the question is whether one can remove at most $k$ edges from $G$ to obtain a (claw,diamond)-free graph. Our main result is that this problem admits a polynomial kernel. We complement this finding by proving that, even on instances with maximum degree $6$, the problem is NP-complete and cannot be solved in time $2^{o(k)}\cdot |V(G)|^{O(1)}$ unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fail
In the Interval Completion problem we are given a graph G and an integer k, and the task is to turn G using at most k edge additions into an interval graph, i.e., a graph admitting an intersection model of intervals on a line. Motivated by applications in sparse matrix multiplication and molecular biology, Kaplan, Shamir and Tarjan [FOCS 1994; SIAM J. Comput. 1999] asked for a fixed-parameter algorithm solving this problem. This question was answer affirmatively more than a decade later by Villanger at el. [STOC 2007; SIAM J. Comput. 2009], who presented an algorithm with running time $O(k^{2k}n^3m)$. We give the first subexponential parameterized algorithm solving Interval Completion in time $k^{O(\sqrt{k})} n^{O(1)}$. This adds Interval Completion to a very small list of parameterized graph modification problems solvable in subexponential time.
In the Proper Interval Completion problem we are given a graph G and an integer k, and the task is to turn G using at most k edge additions into a proper interval graph, i.e., a graph admitting an intersection model of equal-length intervals on a line. The study of Proper Interval Completion from the viewpoint of parameterized complexity has been initiated by Kaplan, Shamir and Tarjan [FOCS 1994; SIAM J. Comput. 1999], who showed an algorithm for the problem working in $O(16^k (n + m))$ time. In this paper we present an algorithm with running time $k^{O(k^{2/3})} + O(nm(kn + m))$, which is the first subexponential parameterized algorithm for Proper Interval Completion.
We give a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm that, given a parameter $k$ and two graphs $G_1,G_2$, either concludes that one of these graphs has treewidth at least $k$, or determines whether $G_1$ and $G_2$ are isomorphic. The running time of the algorithm on an $n$-vertex graph is $2^{O(k^5\log k)}\cdot n^5$, and this is the first fixed-parameter algorithm for Graph Isomorphism parameterized by treewidth. Our algorithm in fact solves the more general canonization problem. We namely design a procedure working in $2^{O(k^5\log k)}\cdot n^5$ time that, for a given graph $G$ on $n$ vertices, either concludes that the treewidth of $G$ is at least $k$, or: * finds in an isomorphic-invariant way a graph $\mathfrak{c}(G)$ that is isomorphic to $G$; * finds an isomorphism-invariant construction term --- an algebraic expression that encodes $G$ together with a tree decomposition of $G$ of width $O(k^4)$. Hence, the isomorphism test reduces to verifying whether the computed isomorphic copies or the construction terms for $G_1$ and $G_2$ are equal.
We study the complexity of a generic hitting problem H-Subgraph Hitting, where given a fixed pattern graph $H$ and an input graph $G$, the task is to find a set $X \subseteq V(G)$ of minimum size that hits all subgraphs of $G$ isomorphic to $H$. In the colorful variant of the problem, each vertex of $G$ is precolored with some color from $V(H)$ and we require to hit only $H$-subgraphs with matching colors. Standard techniques shows that for every fixed $H$, the problem is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the treewidth of $G$; however, it is not clear how exactly the running time should depend on treewidth. For the colorful variant, we demonstrate matching upper and lower bounds showing that the dependence of the running time on treewidth of $G$ is tightly governed by $μ(H)$, the maximum size of a minimal vertex separator in $H$. That is, we show for every fixed $H$ that, on a graph of treewidth $t$, the colorful problem can be solved in time $2^{\mathcal{O}(t^{μ(H)})}\cdot|V(G)|$, but cannot be solved in time $2^{o(t^{μ(H)})}\cdot |V(G)|^{O(1)}$, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH). Furthermore, we give some preliminary results showing that, in the absence of colors, the parameterized complexity landscape of H-Subgraph Hitting is much richer.
In the classic Minimum Bisection problem we are given as input a graph $G$ and an integer $k$. The task is to determine whether there is a partition of $V(G)$ into two parts $A$ and $B$ such that $||A|-|B|| \leq 1$ and there are at most $k$ edges with one endpoint in $A$ and the other in $B$. In this paper we give an algorithm for Minimum Bisection with running time $O(2^{O(k^{3})}n^3 \log^3 n)$. This is the first fixed parameter tractable algorithm for Minimum Bisection. At the core of our algorithm lies a new decomposition theorem that states that every graph $G$ can be decomposed by small separators into parts where each part is "highly connected" in the following sense: any cut of bounded size can separate only a limited number of vertices from each part of the decomposition. Our techniques generalize to the weighted setting, where we seek for a bisection of minimum weight among solutions that contain at most $k$ edges.
In the family of clustering problems, we are given a set of objects (vertices of the graph), together with some observed pairwise similarities (edges). The goal is to identify clusters of similar objects by slightly modifying the graph to obtain a cluster graph (disjoint union of cliques). Hueffner et al. [Theory Comput. Syst. 2010] initiated the parameterized study of Cluster Vertex Deletion, where the allowed modification is vertex deletion, and presented an elegant O(2^k * k^9 + n * m)-time fixed-parameter algorithm, parameterized by the solution size. In our work, we pick up this line of research and present an O(1.9102^k * (n + m))-time branching algorithm.
We present two new deterministic algorithms for the Feedback Vertex Set problem parameterized by the solution size. We begin with a simple algorithm, which runs in O*((2 + ϕ)^k) time, where ϕ< 1.619 is the golden ratio. It already surpasses the previously fastest O*((1+2sqrt(2))^k)-time deterministic algorithm due to Cao et al. [SWAT 2010]. In our developments we follow the approach of Cao et al., however, thanks to a new reduction rule, we obtain not only better dependency on the parameter in the running time, but also a solution with simple analysis and only a single branching rule. Then, we present a modification of the algorithm which, using a more involved set of branching rules, achieves O*(3.592^k) running time.
We first show that the Traveling Salesman Problem in an n-vertex graph with average degree bounded by d can be solved in O*(2^{(1-\eps_d)n}) time and exponential space for a constant \eps_d depending only on d, where the O*-notation suppresses factors polynomial in the input size. Thus, we generalize the recent results of Bjorklund et al. [TALG 2012] on graphs of bounded degree. Then, we move to the problem of counting perfect matchings in a graph. We first present a simple algorithm for counting perfect matchings in an n-vertex graph in O*(2^{n/2}) time and polynomial space; our algorithm matches the complexity bounds of the algorithm of Bjorklund [SODA 2012], but relies on inclusion-exclusion principle instead of algebraic transformations. Building upon this result, we show that the number of perfect matchings in an n-vertex graph with average degree bounded by d can be computed in O*(2^{(1-\eps_{2d})n/2}) time and exponential space, where \eps_{2d} is the constant obtained by us for the Traveling Salesman Problem in graphs of average degree at most 2d. Moreover we obtain a simple algorithm that counts the number of perfect matchings in an n-vertex bipartite graph of average degree at most d in O*(2^{(1-1/(3.55d))n/2}) time, improving and simplifying the recent result of Izumi and Wadayama [FOCS 2012].
In the Correlation Clustering, also known as Cluster Editing, we are given an undirected n-vertex graph G and a positive integer k. The task is to decide if G can be transformed into a cluster graph, i.e., a disjoint union of cliques, by changing at most k adjacencies, i.e. by adding/deleting at most k edges. We give a subexponential algorithm that, in time 2^O(sqrt(pk)) + n^O(1) decides whether G can be transformed into a cluster graph with p cliques by changing at most k adjacencies. We complement our algorithmic findings by the following tight lower bounds on the asymptotic behaviour of our algorithm. We show that, unless ETH fails, for any constant 0 < s <= 1, there is p = Theta(k^s) such that there is no algorithm deciding in time 2^o(sqrt(pk)) n^O(1) whether G can be transformed into a cluster graph with p cliques by changing at most k adjacencies.
Given a graph G and k pairs of vertices (s_1,t_1), ..., (s_k,t_k), the k-Vertex-Disjoint Paths problem asks for pairwise vertex-disjoint paths P_1, ..., P_k such that P_i goes from s_i to t_i. Schrijver [SICOMP'94] proved that the k-Vertex-Disjoint Paths problem on planar directed graphs can be solved in time n^{O(k)}. We give an algorithm with running time 2^{2^{O(k^2)}} n^{O(1)} for the problem, that is, we show the fixed-parameter tractability of the problem.
In this paper we study the problem of finding a maximum induced d-degenerate subgraph in a given n-vertex graph from the point of view of exact algorithms. We show that for any fixed d one can find a maximum induced d-degenerate subgraph in randomized (2-eps_d)^n n^O(1) time, for some constant eps_d>0 depending only on d. Moreover, our algorithm can be used to sample inclusion-wise maximal induced d-degenerate subgraphs in such a manner that every such subgraph is output with probability at least (2-eps_d)^-n; hence, we prove that their number is bounded by (2-eps_d)^n.
The MULTICUT problem, given a graph G, a set of terminal pairs T={(s_i,t_i) | 1 <= i <= r} and an integer p, asks whether one can find a cutset consisting of at most p non-terminal vertices that separates all the terminal pairs, i.e., after removing the cutset, t_i is not reachable from s_i for each 1 <= i <= r. The fixed-parameter tractability of MULTICUT in undirected graphs, parameterized by the size of the cutset only, has been recently proven by Marx and Razgon (STOC'11) and, independently, by Bousquet et al. (STOC'11), after resisting attacks as a long-standing open problem. In this paper we prove that MULTICUT is fixed-parameter tractable on directed acyclic graphs, when parameterized both by the size of the cutset and the number of terminal pairs. We complement this result by showing that this is implausible for parameterization by the size of the cutset only, as this version of the problem remains W[1]-hard.
In the EDGE CLIQUE COVER (ECC) problem, given a graph G and an integer k, we ask whether the edges of G can be covered with k complete subgraphs of G or, equivalently, whether G admits an intersection model on k-element universe. Gramm et al. [JEA 2008] have shown a set of simple rules that reduce the number of vertices of G to 2^k, and no algorithm is known with significantly better running time bound than a brute-force search on this reduced instance. In this paper we show that the approach of Gramm et al. is essentially optimal: we present a polynomial time algorithm that reduces an arbitrary 3-CNF-SAT formula with n variables and m clauses to an equivalent ECC instance (G,k) with k = O(log n) and |V(G)| = O(n + m). Consequently, there is no 2^{2^{o(k)}}poly(n) time algorithm for the ECC problem, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first results for a natural, fixed-parameter tractable problem, and proving that a doubly-exponential dependency on the parameter is essentially necessary.
In the Split Vertex Deletion problem, given a graph G and an integer k, we ask whether one can delete k vertices from the graph G to obtain a split graph (i.e., a graph, whose vertex set can be partitioned into two sets: one inducing a clique and the second one inducing an independent set). In this paper we study fixed-parameter algorithms for Split Vertex Deletion parameterized by k: we show that, up to a factor quasipolynomial in k and polynomial in n, the Split Vertex Deletion problem can be solved in the same time as the well-studied Vertex Cover problem. Plugging the currently best fixed-parameter algorithm for Vertex Cover due to Chen et al. [TCS 2010], we obtain an algorithm that solves Split Vertex Deletion in time O(1.2738^k * k^O(log k) + n^O(1)). To achieve our goal, we prove the following structural result that may be of independent interest: for any graph G we may compute a family P of size n^O(log n) containing partitions of V(G) into two parts, such for any two disjoint subsets X_C, X_I of V(G) where G[X_C] is a clique and G[X_I] is an independent set, there is a partition in P which contains all vertices of X_C on one side and all vertices of X_I on the other.
In the SCHED problem we are given a set of n jobs, together with their processing times and precedence constraints. The task is to order the jobs so that their total completion time is minimized. SCHED is a special case of the Traveling Repairman Problem with precedences. A natural dynamic programming algorithm solves both these problems in 2^n n^O(1) time, and whether there exists an algorithms solving SCHED in O(c^n) time for some constant c < 2 was an open problem posted in 2004 by Woeginger. In this paper we answer this question positively.
Signed graphs, i.e., undirected graphs with edges labelled with a plus or minus sign, are commonly used to model relationships in social networks. Recently, Kermarrec and Thraves initiated the study of the problem of appropriately visualising the network: They asked whether any signed graph can be embedded into the metric space R^l in such a manner that every vertex is closer to all its friends (neighbours via positive edges) than to all its enemies (neighbours via negative edges). Interestingly, embeddability into R^1 can be expressed as a purely combinatorial problem. In this paper we pursue a deeper study of this particular case, answering several questions posed by Kermarrec and Thraves. First, we refine the approach of Kermarrec and Thraves for the case of complete signed graphs by showing that the problem is closely related to the recognition of proper interval graphs. Second, we prove that the general case, whose polynomial-time tractability remained open, is in fact NP-complete. Finally, we provide lower and upper bounds for the time complexity of the general case: we prove that the existence of a subexponential time (in the number of vertices and edges of the input signed graph) algorithm would violate the Exponential Time Hypothesis, whereas a simple dynamic programming approach gives a running time single-exponential in the number of vertices.
In a classical covering problem, we are given a set of requests that we need to satisfy (fully or partially), by buying a subset of items at minimum cost. For example, in the k-MST problem we want to find the cheapest tree spanning at least k nodes of an edge-weighted graph. Here nodes and edges represent requests and items, respectively. In this paper, we initiate the study of a new family of multi-layer covering problems. Each such problem consists of a collection of h distinct instances of a standard covering problem (layers), with the constraint that all layers share the same set of requests. We identify two main subfamilies of these problems: - in a union multi-layer problem, a request is satisfied if it is satisfied in at least one layer; - in an intersection multi-layer problem, a request is satisfied if it is satisfied in all layers. To see some natural applications, consider both generalizations of k-MST. Union k-MST can model a problem where we are asked to connect a set of users to at least one of two communication networks, e.g., a wireless and a wired network. On the other hand, intersection k-MST can formalize the problem of connecting a subset of users to both electricity and water. We present a number of hardness and approximation results for union and intersection versions of several standard optimization problems: MST, Steiner tree, set cover, facility location, TSP, and their partial covering variants.
The field of kernelization studies polynomial-time preprocessing routines for hard problems in the framework of parameterized complexity. Although a framework for proving kernelization lower bounds has been discovered in 2008 and successfully applied multiple times over the last three years, establishing kernelization complexity of many important problems remains open. In this paper we show that, unless NP is a subset of coNP/poly and the polynomial hierarchy collapses up to its third level, the following parameterized problems do not admit a polynomial-time preprocessing algorithm that reduces the size of an instance to polynomial in the parameter: - EDGE CLIQUE COVER, parameterized by the number of cliques, - DIRECTED EDGE/VERTEX MULTIWAY CUT, parameterized by the size of the cutset, even in the case of two terminals, - EDGE/VERTEX MULTICUT, parameterized by the size of the cutset, and - k-WAY CUT, parameterized by the size of the cutset. The existence of a polynomial kernelization for EDGE CLIQUE COVER was a seasoned veteran in open problem sessions. Furthermore, our results complement very recent developments in designing parameterized algorithms for cut problems by Marx and Razgon [STOC'11], Bousquet et al. [STOC'11], Kawarabayashi and Thorup [FOCS'11] and Chitnis et al. [SODA'12].
We show that the dominating set problem parameterized by solution size is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) in graphs that do not contain the claw (K(1,3)), the complete bipartite graph on four vertices where the two parts have one and three vertices, respectively) as an induced subgraph. We present an algorithm that uses 2^O(k^2)n^O(1) time and polynomial space to decide whether a claw-free graph on n vertices has a dominating set of size at most k. Note that this parameterization of dominating set is W[2]-hard on the set of all graphs, and thus is unlikely to have an FPT algorithm for graphs in general. The most general class of graphs for which an FPT algorithm was previously known for this parameterization of dominating set is the class of K(i,j)-free graphs, which exclude, for some fixed i,j, the complete bipartite graph K(i,j) as a subgraph. For i,i >= 2, the class of claw-free graphs and any class of K(i,j)-free graphs are not comparable with respect to set inclusion. We thus extend the range of graphs over which this parameterization of dominating set is known to be fixed-parameter tractable. We also show that, in some sense, it is the presence of the claw that makes this parameterization of the dominating set problem hard. More precisely, we show that for any t ?>= 4, the dominating set problem parameterized by the solution size is W[2]-hard in graphs that exclude the t-claw K(1,t) as an induced subgraph. Our arguments also imply that the related connected dominating set and dominating clique problems are W[2]-hard in these graph classes. Finally, we show that for any t, the clique problem parameterized by solution size, which is W[1]-hard on general graphs, is FPT in t-claw-free graphs. Our results add to the small and growing collection of FPT results for graph classes defined by excluded subgraphs, rather than by excluded minors.
We study the parameterized complexity of a robust generalization of the classical Feedback Vertex Set problem, namely the Group Feedback Vertex Set problem; we are given a graph G with edges labeled with group elements, and the goal is to compute the smallest set of vertices that hits all cycles of G that evaluate to a non-null element of the group. This problem generalizes not only Feedback Vertex Set, but also Subset Feedback Vertex Set, Multiway Cut and Odd Cycle Transversal. Completing the results of Guillemot [Discr. Opt. 2011], we provide a fixed-parameter algorithm for the parameterization by the size of the cutset only. Our algorithm works even if the group is given as a polynomial-time oracle.
In this paper we consider two above lower bound parameterizations of the Node Multiway Cut problem - above the maximum separating cut and above a natural LP-relaxation - and prove them to be fixed-parameter tractable. Our results imply O*(4^k) algorithms for Vertex Cover above Maximum Matching and Almost 2-SAT as well as an O*(2^k) algorithm for Node Multiway Cut with a standard parameterization by the solution size, improving previous bounds for these problems.
For the vast majority of local graph problems standard dynamic programming techniques give c^tw V^O(1) algorithms, where tw is the treewidth of the input graph. On the other hand, for problems with a global requirement (usually connectivity) the best-known algorithms were naive dynamic programming schemes running in tw^O(tw) V^O(1) time. We breach this gap by introducing a technique we dubbed Cut&Count that allows to produce c^tw V^O(1) Monte Carlo algorithms for most connectivity-type problems, including Hamiltonian Path, Feedback Vertex Set and Connected Dominating Set, consequently answering the question raised by Lokshtanov, Marx and Saurabh [SODA'11] in a surprising way. We also show that (under reasonable complexity assumptions) the gap cannot be breached for some problems for which Cut&Count does not work, like CYCLE PACKING. The constant c we obtain is in all cases small (at most 4 for undirected problems and at most 6 for directed ones), and in several cases we are able to show that improving those constants would cause the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis to fail. Our results have numerous consequences in various fields, like FPT algorithms, exact and approximate algorithms on planar and H-minor-free graphs and algorithms on graphs of bounded degree. In all these fields we are able to improve the best-known results for some problems.
The classical Feedback Vertex Set problem asks, for a given undirected graph G and an integer k, to find a set of at most k vertices that hits all the cycles in the graph G. Feedback Vertex Set has attracted a large amount of research in the parameterized setting, and subsequent kernelization and fixed-parameter algorithms have been a rich source of ideas in the field. In this paper we consider a more general and difficult version of the problem, named Subset Feedback Vertex Set (SUBSET-FVS in short) where an instance comes additionally with a set S ? V of vertices, and we ask for a set of at most k vertices that hits all simple cycles passing through S. Because of its applications in circuit testing and genetic linkage analysis SUBSET-FVS was studied from the approximation algorithms perspective by Even et al. [SICOMP'00, SIDMA'00]. The question whether the SUBSET-FVS problem is fixed-parameter tractable was posed independently by Kawarabayashi and Saurabh in 2009. We answer this question affirmatively. We begin by showing that this problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parametrized by |S|. Next we present an algorithm which reduces the given instance to 2^k n^O(1) instances with the size of S bounded by O(k^3), using kernelization techniques such as the 2-Expansion Lemma, Menger's theorem and Gallai's theorem. These two facts allow us to give a 2^O(k log k) n^O(1) time algorithm solving the Subset Feedback Vertex Set problem, proving that it is indeed fixed-parameter tractable.
We study the parameterized complexity of the connected version of the vertex cover problem, where the solution set has to induce a connected subgraph. Although this problem does not admit a polynomial kernel for general graphs (unless NP is a subset of coNP/poly), for planar graphs Guo and Niedermeier [ICALP'08] showed a kernel with at most 14k vertices, subsequently improved by Wang et al. [MFCS'11] to 4k. The constant 4 here is so small that a natural question arises: could it be already an optimal value for this problem? In this paper we answer this quesion in negative: we show a (11/3)k-vertex kernel for Connected Vertex Cover in planar graphs. We believe that this result will motivate further study in search for an optimal kernel.
In this paper we merge recent developments on exact algorithms for finding an ordering of vertices of a given graph that minimizes bandwidth (the BANDWIDTH problem) and for finding an embedding of a given graph into a line that minimizes distortion (the DISTORTION problem). For both problems we develop algorithms that work in O(9.363^n) time and polynomial space. For BANDWIDTH, this improves O^*(10^n) algorithm by Feige and Kilian from 2000, for DISTORTION this is the first polynomial space exact algorithm that works in O(c^n) time we are aware of. As a byproduct, we enhance the O(5^{n+o(n)})-time and O^*(2^n)-space algorithm for DISTORTION by Fomin et al. to an algorithm working in O(4.383^n) time and space.
In this paper we propose and study a new complexity model for approximation algorithms. The main motivation are practical problems over large data sets that need to be solved many times for different scenarios, e.g., many multicast trees that need to be constructed for different groups of users. In our model we allow a preprocessing phase, when some information of the input graph $G=(V,E)$ is stored in a limited size data structure. Next, the data structure enables processing queries of the form ``solve problem A for an input $S\subseteq V$''. We consider problems like {\sc Steiner Forest}, {\sc Facility Location}, {\sc $k$-Median}, {\sc $k$-Center} and {\sc TSP} in the case when the graph induces a doubling metric. Our main results are data structures of near-linear size that are able to answer queries in time close to linear in $|S|$. This improves over typical worst case reuniting time of approximation algorithms in the classical setting which is $Ω(|E|)$ independently of the query size. In most cases, our approximation guarantees are arbitrarily close to those in the classical setting. Additionally, we present the first fully dynamic algorithm for the Steiner tree problem.
One of the driving problems in the CSP area is the Dichotomy Conjecture, formulated in 1993 by Feder and Vardi [STOC'93], stating that for any fixed relational structure G the Constraint Satisfaction Problem CSP(G) is either NP--complete or polynomial time solvable. A large amount of research has gone into checking various specific cases of this conjecture. One such variant which attracted a lot of attention in the recent years is the LIST MATRIX PARTITION problem. In 2004 Cameron et al. [SODA'04] classified almost all LIST MATRIX PARTITION variants for matrices of size at most four. The only case which resisted the classification became known as the STUBBORN PROBLEM. In this paper we show a result which enables us to finish the classification - thus solving a problem which resisted attacks for the last six years. Our approach is based on a combinatorial problem known to be at least as hard as the STUBBORN PROBLEM - the 3-COMPATIBLE COLOURING problem. In this problem we are given a complete graph with each edge assigned one of 3 possible colours and we want to assign one of those 3 colours to each vertex in such a way that no edge has the same colour as both of its endpoints. The tractability of the 3-COMPATIBLE COLOURING problem has been open for several years and the best known algorithm prior to this paper is due to Feder et al. [SODA'05] - a quasipolynomial algorithm with a n^O(log n / log log n) time complexity. In this paper we present a polynomial-time algorithm for the 3-COMPATIBLE COLOURING problem and consequently we prove a dichotomy for the k-COMPATIBLE COLOURING problem.