A randomized polynomial kernelization for Vertex Cover with a smaller parameter

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

In the Vertex Cover problem we are given a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E) and an integer kk and have to determine whether there is a set X⊆VX\subseteq V of size at most kk such that each edge in EE has at least one endpoint in XX. The problem can be easily solved in time O∗(2k)O^*(2^k), making it fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) with respect to kk. While the fastest known algorithm takes only time O∗(1.2738k)O^*(1.2738^k), much stronger improvements have been obtained by studying parameters that are smaller than kk. Apart from treewidth-related results, the arguably best algorithm for Vertex Cover runs in time O∗(2.3146p)O^*(2.3146^p), where p=k−LP(G)p=k-LP(G) is only the excess of the solution size kk over the best fractional vertex cover (Lokshtanov et al.\ TALG 2014). Since p≤kp\leq k but kk cannot be bounded in terms of pp alone, this strictly increases the range of tractable instances. Recently, Garg and Philip (SODA 2016) greatly contributed to understanding the parameterized complexity of the Vertex Cover problem. They prove that 2LP(G)−MM(G)2LP(G)-MM(G) is a lower bound for the vertex cover size of GG, where MM(G)MM(G) is the size of a largest matching of GG, and proceed to study parameter ℓ=k−(2LP(G)−MM(G))\ell=k-(2LP(G)-MM(G)). They give an algorithm of running time O∗(3ℓ)O^*(3^\ell), proving that Vertex Cover is FPT in ℓ\ell. It can be easily observed that ℓ≤p\ell\leq p whereas pp cannot be bounded in terms of ℓ\ell alone. We complement the work of Garg and Philip by proving that Vertex Cover admits a randomized polynomial kernelization in terms of ℓ\ell, i.e., an efficient preprocessing to size polynomial in ℓ\ell. This improves over parameter p=k−LP(G)p=k-LP(G) for which this was previously known (Kratsch and Wahlström FOCS 2012).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.