BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Soumyottam Chatterjee

Soumyottam Chatterjee appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingComputational GeometryDiscrete Mathematicsmath.CO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Byzantine-Resilient Counting in Networks

We present two distributed algorithms for the {\em Byzantine counting problem}, which is concerned with estimating the size of a network in the presence of a large number of Byzantine nodes. In an $n$-node network ($n$ is unknown), our first algorithm, which is {\em deterministic}, finishes in $O(\log{n})$ rounds and is time-optimal. This algorithm can tolerate up to $O(n^{1 - γ})$ arbitrarily (adversarially) placed Byzantine nodes for any arbitrarily small (but fixed) positive constant $γ$. It outputs a (fixed) constant factor estimate of $\log{n}$ that would be known to all but $o(1)$ fraction of the good nodes. This algorithm works for \emph{any} bounded degree expander network. However, this algorithms assumes that good nodes can send arbitrarily large-sized messages in a round. Our second algorithm is {\em randomized} and most good nodes send only small-sized messages (Throughout this paper, a small-sized message is defined to be one that contains $O(\log{n})$ bits in addition to at most a constant number of node IDs.). This algorithm works in \emph{almost all} $d$-regular graphs. It tolerates up to $B(n) = n^{\frac{1}{2} - ξ}$ (note that $n$ and $B(n)$ are unknown to the algorithm) arbitrarily (adversarially) placed Byzantine nodes, where $ξ$ is any arbitrarily small (but fixed) positive constant. This algorithm takes $O(B(n)\log^2{n})$ rounds and outputs a (fixed) constant factor estimate of $\log{n}$ with probability at least $1 - o(1)$. The said estimate is known to most nodes, i.e., $\geq (1 - β)n$ nodes for any arbitrarily small (but fixed) positive constant $β$. To complement our algorithms, we also present an impossibility result that shows that it is impossible to estimate the network size with any reasonable approximation with any non-trivial probability of success if the network does not have sufficient vertex expansion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Network Size Estimation in Small-World Networks under Byzantine Faults

We study the fundamental problem of counting the number of nodes in a sparse network (of unknown size) under the presence of a large number of Byzantine nodes. We assume the full information model where the Byzantine nodes have complete knowledge about the entire state of the network at every round (including random choices made by all the nodes), have unbounded computational power, and can deviate arbitrarily from the protocol. Our main contribution is a randomized distributed algorithm that estimates the size of a network under the presence of a large number of Byzantine nodes. In particular, our algorithm estimates the size of a sparse, "small-world", expander network with up to $O(n^{1 - δ})$ Byzantine nodes, where $n$ is the (unknown) network size and $δ$ can be be any arbitrarily small (but fixed) positive constant. Our algorithm outputs a (fixed) constant factor estimate of $\log(n)$ with high probability; the correct estimate of the network size will be known to a large fraction ($(1 - ε)$-fraction, for any fixed positive constant $ε$) of the honest nodes. Our algorithm is fully distributed, lightweight, and simple to implement, runs in $O(\log^3{n})$ rounds, and requires nodes to send and receive messages of only small-sized messages per round; any node's local computation cost per round is also small.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Sleeping is Efficient: MIS in $O(1)$-rounds Node-averaged Awake Complexity

Maximal Independent Set (MIS) is one of the fundamental problems in distributed computing. The round (time) complexity of distributed MIS has traditionally focused on the \emph{worst-case time} for all nodes to finish. The best-known (randomized) MIS algorithms take $O(\log{n})$ worst-case rounds on general graphs (where $n$ is the number of nodes). Motivated by the goal to reduce \emph{total} energy consumption in energy-constrained networks such as sensor and ad hoc wireless networks, we take an alternative approach to measuring performance. We focus on minimizing the total (or equivalently, the \emph{average}) time for all nodes to finish. It is not clear whether the currently best-known algorithms yield constant-round (or even $o(\log{n})$) node-averaged round complexity for MIS in general graphs. We posit the \emph{sleeping model}, a generalization of the traditional model, that allows nodes to enter either ``sleep'' or ``waking'' states at any round. While waking state corresponds to the default state in the traditional model, in sleeping state a node is ``offline'', i.e., it does not send or receive messages (and messages sent to it are dropped as well) and does not incur any time, communication, or local computation cost. Hence, in this model, only rounds in which a node is awake are counted and we are interested in minimizing the average as well as the worst-case number of rounds a node spends in the awake state. Our main result is that we show that {\em MIS can be solved in (expected) $O(1)$ rounds under node-averaged awake complexity measure} in the sleeping model. In particular, we present a randomized distributed algorithm for MIS that has expected {\em $O(1)$-rounds node-averaged awake complexity} and, with high probability has {\em $O(\log{n})$-rounds worst-case awake complexity} and {\em $O(\log^{3.41}n)$-rounds worst-case complexity}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

An Existential Proof of the Conjecture on Packing Anchored Rectangles

Let $P_{n}$ be a set of $n$ points, including the origin, in the unit square $U = [0,1]^2$. We consider the problem of constructing $n$ axis-parallel and mutually disjoint rectangles inside $U$ such that the bottom-left corner of each rectangle coincides with a point in $P_{n}$ and the total area covered by the rectangles is maximized \cite{ibmpuzzle}, \cite{Winkler2007}, \cite{Winkler2010a}, \cite{Winkler2010b}. The longstanding conjecture has been that at least half of $U$ can be covered when such rectangles are properly placed. In this paper, we give an existential proof of the conjecture.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On Packing Almost Half of a Square with Anchored Rectangles: A Constructive Approach

In this paper, we consider the following geometric puzzle whose origin was traced to Allan Freedman \cite{croft91,tutte69} in the 1960s by Dumitrescu and T{ó}th \cite{adriancasaba2011}. The puzzle has been popularized of late by Peter Winkler \cite{Winkler2007}. Let $P_{n}$ be a set of $n$ points, including the origin, in the unit square $U = [0,1]^2$. The problem is to construct $n$ axis-parallel and mutually disjoint rectangles inside $U$ such that the bottom-left corner of each rectangle coincides with a point in $P_{n}$ and the total area covered by the rectangles is maximized. We would term the above rectangles as \emph{anchored rectangles}. The longstanding conjecture has been that at least half of $U$ can be covered when anchored rectangles are properly placed. Dumitrescu and T{ó}th \cite{Dumitrescu2012} have shown a construction method that can cover at least $0.09121$, i.e., roughly $9\%$ of the area.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access