BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics and opportunities from one place.GraphOpen maps around papers, topics and saved views.

Workspaces

HomeOpen the ranked research feed.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Silvio Micali

Silvio Micali appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer Science and Game TheoryData Structures and Algorithmsmath.PRmath.STNeurons and CognitionStatistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Knightian Analysis of the Vickrey Mechanism

We analyze the Vickrey mechanism for auctions of multiple identical goods when the players have both Knightian uncertainty over their own valuations and incomplete preferences. In this model, the Vickrey mechanism is no longer dominant-strategy, and we prove that all dominant-strategy mechanisms are inadequate. However, we also prove that, in undominated strategies, the social welfare produced by the Vickrey mechanism in the worst case is not only very good, but also essentially optimal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Johnson-Lindenstrauss Compression with Neuroscience-Based Constraints

Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) matrices implemented by sparse random synaptic connections are thought to be a prime candidate for how convergent pathways in the brain compress information. However, to date, there is no complete mathematical support for such implementations given the constraints of real neural tissue. The fact that neurons are either excitatory or inhibitory implies that every so implementable JL matrix must be sign-consistent (i.e., all entries in a single column must be either all non-negative or all non-positive), and the fact that any given neuron connects to a relatively small subset of other neurons implies that the JL matrix had better be sparse. We construct sparse JL matrices that are sign-consistent, and prove that our construction is essentially optimal. Our work answers a mathematical question that was triggered by earlier work and is necessary to justify the existence of JL compression in the brain, and emphasizes that inhibition is crucial if neurons are to perform efficient, correlation-preserving compression.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Knightian Analysis of the VCG Mechanism in Unrestricted Combinatorial Auctions

We consider auctions in which the players have very limited knowledge about their own valuations. Specifically, the only information that a Knightian player $i$ has about the profile of true valuations, $θ^*$, consists of a set of distributions, from one of which $θ_i^*$ has been drawn. The VCG mechanism guarantees very high social welfare both in single- and multi-good auctions, so long as Knightian players do not select strategies that are dominated. With such Knightian players, however, we prove that the VCG mechanism guarantees very poor social welfare in unrestricted combinatorial auctions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Knightian Robustness from Regret Minimization

We consider auctions in which the players have very limited knowledge about their own valuations. Specifically, the only information that a Knightian player $i$ has about the profile of true valuations, $θ^*$, consists of a set of distributions, from one of which $θ_i^*$ has been drawn. We analyze the social-welfare performance of the VCG mechanism, for unrestricted combinatorial auctions, when Knightian players that either (a) choose a regret-minimizing strategy, or (b) resort to regret minimization only to refine further their own sets of undominated strategies, if needed. We prove that this performance is very good.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Knightian Robustness of Single-Parameter Domains

We consider players that have very limited knowledge about their own valuations. Specifically, the only information that a Knightian player $i$ has about the profile of true valuations, $θ^*$, consists of a set of distributions, from one of which $θ_i^*$ has been drawn. We prove a ``robustness'' theorem for Knightian players in single-parameter domains: every mechanism that is weakly dominant-strategy truthful for classical players continues to be well-behaved for Knightian players that choose undominated strategies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Knightian Auctions

We study single-good auctions in a setting where each player knows his own valuation only within a constant multiplicative factor δ in (0,1), and the mechanism designer knows δ. The classical notions of implementation in dominant strategies and implementation in undominated strategies are naturally extended to this setting, but their power is vastly different. On the negative side, we prove that no dominant-strategy mechanism can guarantee social welfare that is significantly better than that achievable by assigning the good to a random player. On the positive side, we provide tight upper and lower bounds for the fraction of the maximum social welfare achievable in undominated strategies, whether deterministically or probabilistically.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access