BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Rati Gelashvili

Rati Gelashvili appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingData Structures and Algorithmsmath.PRCryptography and SecurityDiscrete MathematicsInformation Theorymath.ITmath.NAmath.STNeurons and CognitionPerformanceStatistics Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

9works
12topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Block-STM: Scaling Blockchain Execution by Turning Ordering Curse to a Performance Blessing

Block-STM is a parallel execution engine for smart contracts, built around the principles of Software Transactional Memory. Transactions are grouped in blocks, and every execution of the block must yield the same deterministic outcome. Block-STM further enforces that the outcome is consistent with executing transactions according to a preset order, leveraging this order to dynamically detect dependencies and avoid conflicts during speculative transaction execution. At the core of Block-STM is a novel, low-overhead collaborative scheduler of execution and validation tasks. Block-STM is implemented on the main branch of the Diem Blockchain code-base and runs in production at Aptos. Our evaluation demonstrates that Block-STM is adaptive to workloads with different conflict rates and utilizes the inherent parallelism therein. Block-STM achieves up to $110k$ tps in the Diem benchmarks and up to $170k$ tps in the Aptos Benchmarks, which is a $20$x and $17$x improvement over the sequential baseline with $32$ threads, respectively. The throughput on a contended workload is up to $50k$ tps and $80k$ tps in Diem and Aptos benchmarks, respectively.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Lower Bounds for Shared-Memory Leader Election under Bounded Write Contention

This paper gives tight logarithmic lower bounds on the solo step complexity of leader election in an asynchronous shared-memory model with single-writer multi-reader (SWMR) registers, for randomized obstruction-free algorithms. The approach extends to lower bounds for randomized obstruction-free algorithms using multi-writer registers under bounded write concurrency, showing a trade-off between the solo step complexity of a leader election algorithm, and the worst-case contention incurred by a processor in an execution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Be Prepared When Network Goes Bad: An Asynchronous View-Change Protocol

The popularity of permissioned blockchain systems demands BFT SMR protocols that are efficient under good network conditions (synchrony) and robust under bad network conditions (asynchrony). The state-of-the-art partially synchronous BFT SMR protocols provide optimal linear communication cost per decision under synchrony and good leaders, but lose liveness under asynchrony. On the other hand, the state-of-the-art asynchronous BFT SMR protocols are live even under asynchrony, but always pay quadratic cost even under synchrony. In this paper, we propose a BFT SMR protocol that achieves the best of both worlds -- optimal linear cost per decision under good networks and leaders, optimal quadratic cost per decision under bad networks, and remains always live.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Why Extension-Based Proofs Fail

We introduce extension-based proofs, a class of impossibility proofs that includes valency arguments. They are modelled as an interaction between a prover and a protocol. Using proofs based on combinatorial topology, it has been shown that it is impossible to deterministically solve k-set agreement among n > k > 1 processes in a wait-free manner in certain asynchronous models. However, it was unknown whether proofs based on simpler techniques were possible. We show that this impossibility result cannot be obtained for one of these models by an extension-based proof and, hence, extension-based proofs are limited in power.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

How to Elect a Leader Faster than a Tournament

The problem of electing a leader from among $n$ contenders is one of the fundamental questions in distributed computing. In its simplest formulation, the task is as follows: given $n$ processors, all participants must eventually return a win or lose indication, such that a single contender may win. Despite a considerable amount of work on leader election, the following question is still open: can we elect a leader in an asynchronous fault-prone system faster than just running a $Θ(\log n)$-time tournament, against a strong adaptive adversary? In this paper, we answer this question in the affirmative, improving on a decades-old upper bound. We introduce two new algorithmic ideas to reduce the time complexity of electing a leader to $O(\log^* n)$, using $O(n^2)$ point-to-point messages. A non-trivial application of our algorithm is a new upper bound for the tight renaming problem, assigning $n$ items to the $n$ participants in expected $O(\log^2 n)$ time and $O(n^2)$ messages. We complement our results with lower bound of $Ω(n^2)$ messages for solving these two problems, closing the question of their message complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

On the Optimal Space Complexity of Consensus for Anonymous Processes

The optimal space complexity of consensus in shared memory is a decades-old open problem. For a system of $n$ processes, no algorithm is known that uses a sublinear number of registers. However, the best known lower bound due to Fich, Herlihy, and Shavit requires $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ registers. The special symmetric case of the problem where processes are anonymous (run the same algorithm) has also attracted attention. Even in this case, the best lower and upper bounds are still $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ and $O(n)$. Moreover, Fich, Herlihy, and Shavit first proved their lower bound for anonymous processes, and then extended it to the general case. As such, resolving the anonymous case might be a significant step towards understanding and solving the general problem. In this work, we show that in a system of anonymous processes, any consensus algorithm satisfying nondeterministic solo termination has to use $Ω(n)$ read-write registers in some execution. This implies an $Ω(n)$ lower bound on the space complexity of deterministic obstruction-free and randomized wait-free consensus, matching the upper bound and closing the symmetric case of the open problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Restricted Isometry Property for General p-Norms

The Restricted Isometry Property (RIP) is a fundamental property of a matrix which enables sparse recovery. Informally, an $m \times n$ matrix satisfies RIP of order $k$ for the $\ell_p$ norm, if $\|Ax\|_p \approx \|x\|_p$ for every vector $x$ with at most $k$ non-zero coordinates. For every $1 \leq p < \infty$ we obtain almost tight bounds on the minimum number of rows $m$ necessary for the RIP property to hold. Prior to this work, only the cases $p = 1$, $1 + 1 / \log k$, and $2$ were studied. Interestingly, our results show that the case $p = 2$ is a "singularity" point: the optimal number of rows $m$ is $\widetildeΘ(k^{p})$ for all $p\in [1,\infty)\setminus \{2\}$, as opposed to $\widetildeΘ(k)$ for $k=2$. We also obtain almost tight bounds for the column sparsity of RIP matrices and discuss implications of our results for the Stable Sparse Recovery problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Johnson-Lindenstrauss Compression with Neuroscience-Based Constraints

Johnson-Lindenstrauss (JL) matrices implemented by sparse random synaptic connections are thought to be a prime candidate for how convergent pathways in the brain compress information. However, to date, there is no complete mathematical support for such implementations given the constraints of real neural tissue. The fact that neurons are either excitatory or inhibitory implies that every so implementable JL matrix must be sign-consistent (i.e., all entries in a single column must be either all non-negative or all non-positive), and the fact that any given neuron connects to a relatively small subset of other neurons implies that the JL matrix had better be sparse. We construct sparse JL matrices that are sign-consistent, and prove that our construction is essentially optimal. Our work answers a mathematical question that was triggered by earlier work and is necessary to justify the existence of JL compression in the brain, and emphasizes that inhibition is crucial if neurons are to perform efficient, correlation-preserving compression.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On the Importance of Registers for Computability

All consensus hierarchies in the literature assume that we have, in addition to copies of a given object, an unbounded number of registers. But why do we really need these registers? This paper considers what would happen if one attempts to solve consensus using various objects but without any registers. We show that under a reasonable assumption, objects like queues and stacks cannot emulate the missing registers. We also show that, perhaps surprisingly, initialization, shown to have no computational consequences when registers are readily available, is crucial in determining the synchronization power of objects when no registers are allowed. Finally, we show that without registers, the number of available objects affects the level of consensus that can be solved. Our work thus raises the question of whether consensus hierarchies which assume an unbounded number of registers truly capture synchronization power, and begins a line of research aimed at better understanding the interaction between read-write memory and the powerful synchronization operations available on modern architectures.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access