BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sidney I. Resnick

Sidney I. Resnick contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Applicationsmath.STMethodologyStatistics Theorymath.PR

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Directed Preferential Attachment Model with Poisson Measurement

When modeling a directed social network, one choice is to use the traditional preferential attachment model, which generates power-law tail distributions. In a traditional directed preferential attachment, every new edge is added sequentially into the network. However, for real datasets, it is common to only have coarse timestamps available, which means several new edges are created at the same timestamp. Previous analyses on the evolution of social networks reveal that after reaching a stable phase, the growth of edge counts in a network follows a non-homogeneous Poisson process with a constant rate across the day but varying rates from day to day. Taking such empirical observations into account, we propose a modified preferential attachment model with Poisson measurement, and study its asymptotic behavior. This modified model is then fitted to real datasets, and we see it provides a better fit than the traditional one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Extremes of Censored and Uncensored Lifetimes in Survival Data

The i.i.d. censoring model for survival analysis assumes two independent sequences of i.i.d. positive random variables, $(T_i^*)_{1\le i\le n}$ and $(U_i)_{1\le i\le n}$. The data consists of observations on the random sequence $\big(T_i=\min(T_i^*,U_i)$ together with accompanying censor indicators. Values of $T_i$ with $T_i^*\le U_i$ are said to be uncensored, those with $T_i^*> U_i$ are censored. We assume that the distributions of the $T_i^*$ and $U_i$ are in the domain of attraction of the Gumbel distribution and obtain the asymptotic distributions, as sample size $n\to\infty$, of the maximum values of the censored and uncensored lifetimes in the data, and of statistics related to them. These enable us to examine questions concerning the possible existence of cured individuals in the population.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On a minimum distance procedure for threshold selection in tail analysis

Power-law distributions have been widely observed in different areas of scientific research. Practical estimation issues include how to select a threshold above which observations follow a power-law distribution and then how to estimate the power-law tail index. A minimum distance selection procedure (MDSP) is proposed in Clauset et al. (2009) and has been widely adopted in practice, especially in the analyses of social networks. However, theoretical justifications for this selection procedure remain scant. In this paper, we study the asymptotic behavior of the selected threshold and the corresponding power-law index given by the MDSP. We find that the MDSP tends to choose too high a threshold level and leads to Hill estimates with large variances and root mean squared errors for simulated data with Pareto-like tails.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access