BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Shufei Zhang

Shufei Zhang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningComputation and LanguageComputer VisionCryptography and Security

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

FlowSearch: Advancing deep research with dynamic structured knowledge flow

Deep research is an inherently challenging task that demands both breadth and depth of thinking. It involves navigating diverse knowledge spaces and reasoning over complex, multi-step dependencies, which presents substantial challenges for agentic systems. To address this, we propose FlowSearch, a multi-agent framework that actively constructs and evolves a dynamic structured knowledge flow to drive subtask execution and reasoning. FlowSearch is capable of strategically planning and expanding the knowledge flow to enable parallel exploration and hierarchical task decomposition, while also adjusting the knowledge flow in real time based on feedback from intermediate reasoning outcomes and insights. FlowSearch achieves competitive performance on both general and scientific benchmarks, including GAIA, HLE, GPQA and TRQA, demonstrating its effectiveness in multi-disciplinary research scenarios and its potential to advance scientific discovery. The code is available at https://github.com/InternScience/InternAgent.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

SciEvalKit: An Open-source Evaluation Toolkit for Scientific General Intelligence

We introduce SciEvalKit, a unified benchmarking toolkit designed to evaluate AI models for science across a broad range of scientific disciplines and task capabilities. Unlike general-purpose evaluation platforms, SciEvalKit focuses on the core competencies of scientific intelligence, including Scientific Multimodal Perception, Scientific Multimodal Reasoning, Scientific Multimodal Understanding, Scientific Symbolic Reasoning, Scientific Code Generation, Science Hypothesis Generation and Scientific Knowledge Understanding. It supports six major scientific domains, spanning from physics and chemistry to astronomy and materials science. SciEvalKit builds a foundation of expert-grade scientific benchmarks, curated from real-world, domain-specific datasets, ensuring that tasks reflect authentic scientific challenges. The toolkit features a flexible, extensible evaluation pipeline that enables batch evaluation across models and datasets, supports custom model and dataset integration, and provides transparent, reproducible, and comparable results. By bridging capability-based evaluation and disciplinary diversity, SciEvalKit offers a standardized yet customizable infrastructure to benchmark the next generation of scientific foundation models and intelligent agents. The toolkit is open-sourced and actively maintained to foster community-driven development and progress in AI4Science.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On Model Robustness Against Adversarial Examples

We study the model robustness against adversarial examples, referred to as small perturbed input data that may however fool many state-of-the-art deep learning models. Unlike previous research, we establish a novel theory addressing the robustness issue from the perspective of stability of the loss function in the small neighborhood of natural examples. We propose to exploit an energy function to describe the stability and prove that reducing such energy guarantees the robustness against adversarial examples. We also show that the traditional training methods including adversarial training with the $l_2$ norm constraint (AT) and Virtual Adversarial Training (VAT) tend to minimize the lower bound of our proposed energy function. We make an analysis showing that minimization of such lower bound can however lead to insufficient robustness within the neighborhood around the input sample. Furthermore, we design a more rational method with the energy regularization which proves to achieve better robustness than previous methods. Through a series of experiments, we demonstrate the superiority of our model on both supervised tasks and semi-supervised tasks. In particular, our proposed adversarial framework achieves the best performance compared with previous adversarial training methods on benchmark datasets MNIST, CIFAR-10, and SVHN. Importantly, they demonstrate much better robustness against adversarial examples than all the other comparison methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Robust Generative Adversarial Network

Generative adversarial networks (GANs) are powerful generative models, but usually suffer from instability and generalization problem which may lead to poor generations. Most existing works focus on stabilizing the training of the discriminator while ignoring the generalization properties. In this work, we aim to improve the generalization capability of GANs by promoting the local robustness within the small neighborhood of the training samples. We also prove that the robustness in small neighborhood of training sets can lead to better generalization. Particularly, we design a robust optimization framework where the generator and discriminator compete with each other in a \textit{worst-case} setting within a small Wasserstein ball. The generator tries to map \textit{the worst input distribution} (rather than a Gaussian distribution used in most GANs) to the real data distribution, while the discriminator attempts to distinguish the real and fake distribution \textit{with the worst perturbation}. We have proved that our robust method can obtain a tighter generalization upper bound than traditional GANs under mild assumptions, ensuring a theoretical superiority of RGAN over GANs. A series of experiments on CIFAR-10, STL-10 and CelebA datasets indicate that our proposed robust framework can improve on five baseline GAN models substantially and consistently.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access