BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Shigang Li

Shigang Li contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingMachine Learningmath.OCPerformancephysics.comp-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Data-Centric Optimization Framework for Machine Learning

Rapid progress in deep learning is leading to a diverse set of quickly changing models, with a dramatically growing demand for compute. However, as frameworks specialize performance optimization to patterns in popular networks, they implicitly constrain novel and diverse models that drive progress in research. We empower deep learning researchers by defining a flexible and user-customizable pipeline for optimizing training of arbitrary deep neural networks, based on data movement minimization. The pipeline begins with standard networks in PyTorch or ONNX and transforms computation through progressive lowering. We define four levels of general-purpose transformations, from local intra-operator optimizations to global data movement reduction. These operate on a data-centric graph intermediate representation that expresses computation and data movement at all levels of abstraction, including expanding basic operators such as convolutions to their underlying computations. Central to the design is the interactive and introspectable nature of the pipeline. Every part is extensible through a Python API, and can be tuned interactively using a GUI. We demonstrate competitive performance or speedups on ten different networks, with interactive optimizations discovering new opportunities in EfficientNet.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Asynchronous Decentralized SGD with Quantized and Local Updates

Decentralized optimization is emerging as a viable alternative for scalable distributed machine learning, but also introduces new challenges in terms of synchronization costs. To this end, several communication-reduction techniques, such as non-blocking communication, quantization, and local steps, have been explored in the decentralized setting. Due to the complexity of analyzing optimization in such a relaxed setting, this line of work often assumes \emph{global} communication rounds, which require additional synchronization. In this paper, we consider decentralized optimization in the simpler, but harder to analyze, \emph{asynchronous gossip} model, in which communication occurs in discrete, randomly chosen pairings among nodes. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that a variant of SGD called \emph{SwarmSGD} still converges in this setting, even if \emph{non-blocking communication}, \emph{quantization}, and \emph{local steps} are all applied \emph{in conjunction}, and even if the node data distributions and underlying graph topology are both \emph{heterogenous}. Our analysis is based on a new connection with multi-dimensional load-balancing processes. We implement this algorithm and deploy it in a super-computing environment, showing that it can outperform previous decentralized methods in terms of end-to-end training time, and that it can even rival carefully-tuned large-batch SGD for certain tasks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Scalability for Parallel Machine Learning Training Algorithm: Dataset Matters

To gain a better performance, many researchers put more computing resource into an application. However, in the AI area, there is still a lack of a successful large-scale machine learning training application: The scalability and performance reproducibility of parallel machine learning training algorithm are limited and there are a few pieces of research focusing on why these indexes are limited but there are very few research efforts explaining the reasons in essence. In this paper, we propose that the sample difference in dataset plays a more prominent role in parallel machine learning algorithm scalability. Dataset characters can measure sample difference. These characters include the variance of the sample in a dataset, sparsity, sample diversity and similarity in sampling sequence. To match our proposal, we choose four kinds of parallel machine learning training algorithms as our research objects: (1) Asynchronous parallel SGD algorithm (Hogwild! algorithm) (2) Parallel model average SGD algorithm (Mini-batch SGD algorithm) (3) Decenterilization optimization algorithm, (4) Dual Coordinate Optimization (DADM algorithm). These algorithms cover different types of machine learning optimization algorithms. We present the analysis of their convergence proof and design experiments. Our results show that the characters datasets decide the scalability of the machine learning algorithm. What is more, there is an upper bound of parallel scalability for machine learning algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The static parallel distribution algorithms for hybrid density-functional calculations in HONPAS package

Hybrid density-functional calculation is one of the most commonly adopted electronic structure theory used in computational chemistry and materials science because of its balance between accuracy and computational cost. Recently, we have developed a novel scheme called NAO2GTO to achieve linear scaling (Order-N) calculations for hybrid density-functionals. In our scheme, the most time-consuming step is the calculation of the electron repulsion integrals (ERIs) part. So how to create an even distribution of these ERIs in parallel implementation is an issue of particular importance. Here, we present two static scalable distributed algorithms for the ERIs computation. Firstly, the ERIs are distributed over ERIs shell pairs. Secondly, the ERIs is distributed over ERIs shell quartets. In both algorithms, the calculation of ERIs is independent of each other, so the communication time is minimized. We show our speedup results to demonstrate the performance of these static parallel distributed algorithms in the Hefei Order-N packages for \textit{ab initio} simulations (HONPAS).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access