BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research pathsDiscover
Research tools
Network
Opportunities
Account
Source author record
Shadow Robinson appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.
Catalog footprint
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
By starting with a simple configurations of 2 neutrons in a single j shell we hare able to learn the effects of high lying configurations on physical properties such as nuclear magnetic g factors. Some counterintuitive results are found when both high lying spin orbit partners are allowed to admix with the basic configuration.
Calculations of B(E2)'s and quadruplole moments in the g_{9/2 region below ^{100} Sn are hampered by the fact that the inclusion of the g_{7/2}configuration leads to model spaces that are too large to handle. We therefore examine lighter nuclei if the fp region where one can easily include all the orbitals, f,{}_{7/2}, p_{3/2}, p_{1/2}and f_{5/2} . We perform such calculations but then take a step back and exclude the f_{5/2} orbital. By comparing the 2 calculations we can hope to get insight into the importance of the missing spin-orbit partner in other regions.
We examine the consequences of using a surface delta interaction to obtain the nuclear magnetic dipole g factors for 86Kr in a 2 proton hole model space. We find that the g factors of lowest the 2+ and 4+ states are equal to one, or more properly gl. The inclusion of a spin-orbit interaction is also discussed. Comparisons are made with large space calculations.
Preiviously, in a single j-shell calculation (j=g_{9/2}), we obtained the excitation energy of the T=2 J=0+ isobaric analog state in ^{96} Ag to be a bit below 1 MeV relative to the J=8+ T=1 ground state . We here use binding energy data and Coulomb energy estimates to obtain this same excitation energy and to see if the 2 approaches are consistent.
Calculations are performed for energies of isobaric analog states with isospins T=2 and T=3 in regions where they have been found experimentally e.g. f-p shell, and regions where they have not yet been found e.g. g_{9/2} near Z=50,N=50. We consider two approaches--one using binding energy formulas and Coulomb energies contained therein and the other using shell model calculations. It is noted that some (but not all) calculations yield very low excitation energies for the J=0^{+} T=2 isobaric analog state in ^{96} Ag.