BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
Preiviously, in a single j-shell calculation (j=g_{9/2}), we obtained the excitation energy of the T=2 J=0+ isobaric analog state in ^{96} Ag to be a bit below 1 MeV relative to the J=8+ T=1 ground state . We here use binding energy data and Coulomb energy estimates to obtain this same excitation energy and to see if the 2 approaches are consistent.
Calculations are performed for energies of isobaric analog states with isospins T=2 and T=3 in regions where they have been found experimentally e.g. f-p shell, and regions where they have not yet been found e.g. g_{9/2} near Z=50,N=50. We consider two approaches--one using binding energy formulas and Coulomb energies contained therein and the other using shell model calculations. It is noted that some (but not all) calculations yield very low excitation energies for the J=0^{+} T=2 isobaric analog state in ^{96} Ag.
In a previous work certain unitary9-j symbols were shown to go asymptotically to zero in the large j limit. In this work we examine this inmore detail. We find an approximate power law for the behaviour of ccertain U9-j's in the large j limit and exponential decreased for others.
We consider work performed over the last decade on single-j-shell studies. We will discuss four topics.
We consider symmetries which arise when two-body interaction matrix elements with isopin T=0 are set equal to a constant in a single-j -shell calculation. The nucleus ^{96} Cd is used as an example.
We recently formulated a rule for isomeric states for a system of 4 nucleons with isospin T=1, namely that if the nucleons are in a single j shell then states with angular momenta J=2 and J=(2j-1) are either isomeric or ground states [ze12]. To show that this is a robust result, we here consider a new interaction from the literature that was used to discuss even-even and odd-even nuclei. We here apply it to an odd-odd nucleus.
The methods used till now to calculate the neutrinoless double beta decay matrix elements are: the Quasiparticle Random Phase Approximation (QRPA), the Shell Model (SM), the angular momentum projected Hartee-Fock-Bogoliubov approach (HFB) and the Interacting Boson Model (IBM). The different approaches are compared specifically concerning the the angular momenta and parities of the neutron pairs, which are changed into two protons by the 0νββ decay. The QRPA and SM involve about the same angular momentum and parity neutron pairs, while the HFB is restricted to 0+,2+,4+,..., and IBM to 0+ and 2+ nucleon pairs. The differences in the seniority contributions for the QRPA and the SM are discussed.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.