BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Serge Chaumette

Serge Chaumette contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingNetworking and Internet ArchitectureData Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Characterizing Topological Assumptions of Distributed Algorithms in Dynamic Networks

Besides the complexity in time or in number of messages, a common approach for analyzing distributed algorithms is to look at the assumptions they make on the underlying network. We investigate this question from the perspective of network dynamics. In particular, we ask how a given property on the evolution of the network can be rigorously proven as necessary or sufficient for a given algorithm. The main contribution of this paper is to propose the combination of two existing tools in this direction: local computations by means of graph relabelings, and evolving graphs. Such a combination makes it possible to express fine-grained properties on the network dynamics, then examine what impact those properties have on the execution at a precise, intertwined, level. We illustrate the use of this framework through the analysis of three simple algorithms, then discuss general implications of this work, which include (i) the possibility to compare distributed algorithms on the basis of their topological requirements, (ii) a formal hierarchy of dynamic networks based on these requirements, and (iii) the potential for mechanization induced by our framework, which we believe opens a door towards automated analysis and decision support in dynamic networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Testing Temporal Connectivity in Sparse Dynamic Graphs

We address the problem of testing whether a given dynamic graph is temporally connected, {\it i.e} a temporal path (also called a {\em journey}) exists between all pairs of vertices. We consider a discrete version of the problem, where the topology is given as an evolving graph ${\cal G}=\{G_1,G_2,...,G_{k}\}$ whose set of vertices is invariant and the set of (directed) edges varies over time. Two cases are studied, depending on whether a single edge or an unlimited number of edges can be crossed in a same $G_i$ (strict journeys {\it vs} non-strict journeys). In the case of {\em strict} journeys, a number of existing algorithms designed for more general problems can be adapted. We adapt one of them to the above formulation of the problem and characterize its running time complexity. The parameters of interest are the length of the graph sequence $k=|{\cal G}|$, the maximum {\em instant} density $μ=max(|E_i|)$, and the {\em cumulated} density $m=|\cup E_i|$. Our algorithm has a time complexity of $O(kμn)$, where $n$ is the number of nodes. This complexity is compared to that of the other solutions: one is always more costly (keep in mind that is solves a more general problem), the other one is more or less costly depending on the interplay between instant density and cumulated density. The length $k$ of the sequence also plays a role. We characterize the key values of $k, μ$ and $m$ for which either algorithm should be used. In the case of {\em non-strict} journeys, for which no algorithm is known, we show that some pre-processing of the input graph allows us to re-use the same algorithm than before. By chance, these operations happens to cost again $O(kμn)$ time, which implies that the second problem is not more difficult than the first.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Un algorithme de test pour la connexité temporelle des graphes dynamiques de faible densité

We address the problem of testing whether a dynamic graph is temporally connected, i.e. a temporal path ({\em journey}) exists between all pairs of vertices. We consider a discrete version of the problem, where the topology is given as an evolving graph $\G=\{G_1,G_2,...,G_{k}\}$ in which only the set of (directed) edges varies. Two cases are studied, depending on whether a single edge or an unlimited number of edges can be crossed in a same $G_i$ (strict journeys {\it vs} non-strict journeys). For strict journeys, two existing algorithms designed for other problems can be adapted. However, we show that a dedicated approach achieves a better time complexity than one of these two algorithms in all cases, and than the other one for those graphs whose density is low at any time (though arbitrary over time). The time complexity of our algorithm is $O(kμn)$, where $k=|\G|$ is the number of time steps and $μ=max(|E_i|)$ is the maximum {\em instant} density, to be contrasted with $m=|\cup E_i|$, the {\em cumulated} density. Indeed, it is not uncommon for a mobility scenario to satisfy, for instance, both $μ=o(n)$ and $m=Θ(n^2)$. We characterize the key values of $k, μ$ and $m$ for which our algorithm should be used. For non-strict journeys, for which no algorithm is known, we show that a similar strategy can be used to answer the question, still in $O(kμn)$ time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Distributed Maintenance of Anytime Available Spanning Trees in Dynamic Networks

We address the problem of building and maintaining distributed spanning trees in highly dynamic networks, in which topological events can occur at any time and any rate, and no stable periods can be assumed. In these harsh environments, we strive to preserve some properties such as cycle-freeness or the existence of a root in each tree, in order to make it possible to keep using the trees uninterruptedly (to a possible extent). Our algorithm operates at a coarse-grain level, using atomic pairwise interactions in a way akin to recent population protocol models. The algorithm relies on a perpetual alternation of \emph{topology-induced splittings} and \emph{computation-induced mergings} of a forest of spanning trees. Each tree in the forest hosts exactly one token (also called root) that performs a random walk {\em inside} the tree, switching parent-child relationships as it crosses edges. When two tokens are located on both sides of a same edge, their trees are merged upon this edge and one token disappears. Whenever an edge that belongs to a tree disappears, its child endpoint regenerates a new token instantly. The main features of this approach is that both \emph{merging} and \emph{splitting} are purely localized phenomenons. In this paper, we present and motivate the algorithm, and we prove its correctness in arbitrary dynamic networks. Then we discuss several implementation choices around this general principle. Preliminary results regarding its analysis are also discussed, in particular an analytical expression of the expected merging time for two given trees in a static context.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access