BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Arnaud Casteigts

Arnaud Casteigts contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingNetworking and Internet ArchitectureData Structures and Algorithmsphysics.soc-phSocial and Information NetworksArtificial IntelligenceComputation and LanguageComputational ComplexityDiscrete MathematicsFormal Languages and Automata Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
10works
0followers
10topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Revisiting the Role of Coverings in Anonymous Networks: Spanning Tree Construction and Topology Recognition

This paper revisits two classical distributed problems in anonymous networks, namely spanning tree construction and topology recognition, from the point of view of graph covering theory. For both problems, we characterize necessary and sufficient conditions on the communication graph in terms of directed symmetric coverings. These characterizations answer along-standing open question posed by Yamashita and Kameda [YK96], and shed new light on the connection between coverings and the concepts of views and quotient graphs developed by the same authors. Characterizing conditions in terms of coverings is significant because it connects the field with a vast body of classical literature in graph theory and algebraic topology. In particular, it gives access to powerful tools such as Reidemeister's theorem and Mazurkiewicz's algorithm. Combined together, these tools allow us to present elegant proofs of otherwise intricate results, and their constructive nature makes them effectively usable in the algorithms. This paper also gives us the opportunity to present the field of covering theory in a pedagogical way, with a focus on the two aforementioned tools, whose potential impact goes beyond the specific problems considered in this work.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Characterizing Topological Assumptions of Distributed Algorithms in Dynamic Networks

Besides the complexity in time or in number of messages, a common approach for analyzing distributed algorithms is to look at the assumptions they make on the underlying network. We investigate this question from the perspective of network dynamics. In particular, we ask how a given property on the evolution of the network can be rigorously proven as necessary or sufficient for a given algorithm. The main contribution of this paper is to propose the combination of two existing tools in this direction: local computations by means of graph relabelings, and evolving graphs. Such a combination makes it possible to express fine-grained properties on the network dynamics, then examine what impact those properties have on the execution at a precise, intertwined, level. We illustrate the use of this framework through the analysis of three simple algorithms, then discuss general implications of this work, which include (i) the possibility to compare distributed algorithms on the basis of their topological requirements, (ii) a formal hierarchy of dynamic networks based on these requirements, and (iii) the potential for mechanization induced by our framework, which we believe opens a door towards automated analysis and decision support in dynamic networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Testing Temporal Connectivity in Sparse Dynamic Graphs

We address the problem of testing whether a given dynamic graph is temporally connected, {\it i.e} a temporal path (also called a {\em journey}) exists between all pairs of vertices. We consider a discrete version of the problem, where the topology is given as an evolving graph ${\cal G}=\{G_1,G_2,...,G_{k}\}$ whose set of vertices is invariant and the set of (directed) edges varies over time. Two cases are studied, depending on whether a single edge or an unlimited number of edges can be crossed in a same $G_i$ (strict journeys {\it vs} non-strict journeys). In the case of {\em strict} journeys, a number of existing algorithms designed for more general problems can be adapted. We adapt one of them to the above formulation of the problem and characterize its running time complexity. The parameters of interest are the length of the graph sequence $k=|{\cal G}|$, the maximum {\em instant} density $μ=max(|E_i|)$, and the {\em cumulated} density $m=|\cup E_i|$. Our algorithm has a time complexity of $O(kμn)$, where $n$ is the number of nodes. This complexity is compared to that of the other solutions: one is always more costly (keep in mind that is solves a more general problem), the other one is more or less costly depending on the interplay between instant density and cumulated density. The length $k$ of the sequence also plays a role. We characterize the key values of $k, μ$ and $m$ for which either algorithm should be used. In the case of {\em non-strict} journeys, for which no algorithm is known, we show that some pre-processing of the input graph allows us to re-use the same algorithm than before. By chance, these operations happens to cost again $O(kμn)$ time, which implies that the second problem is not more difficult than the first.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Un algorithme de test pour la connexité temporelle des graphes dynamiques de faible densité

We address the problem of testing whether a dynamic graph is temporally connected, i.e. a temporal path ({\em journey}) exists between all pairs of vertices. We consider a discrete version of the problem, where the topology is given as an evolving graph $\G=\{G_1,G_2,...,G_{k}\}$ in which only the set of (directed) edges varies. Two cases are studied, depending on whether a single edge or an unlimited number of edges can be crossed in a same $G_i$ (strict journeys {\it vs} non-strict journeys). For strict journeys, two existing algorithms designed for other problems can be adapted. However, we show that a dedicated approach achieves a better time complexity than one of these two algorithms in all cases, and than the other one for those graphs whose density is low at any time (though arbitrary over time). The time complexity of our algorithm is $O(kμn)$, where $k=|\G|$ is the number of time steps and $μ=max(|E_i|)$ is the maximum {\em instant} density, to be contrasted with $m=|\cup E_i|$, the {\em cumulated} density. Indeed, it is not uncommon for a mobility scenario to satisfy, for instance, both $μ=o(n)$ and $m=Θ(n^2)$. We characterize the key values of $k, μ$ and $m$ for which our algorithm should be used. For non-strict journeys, for which no algorithm is known, we show that a similar strategy can be used to answer the question, still in $O(kμn)$ time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Distributed Maintenance of Anytime Available Spanning Trees in Dynamic Networks

We address the problem of building and maintaining distributed spanning trees in highly dynamic networks, in which topological events can occur at any time and any rate, and no stable periods can be assumed. In these harsh environments, we strive to preserve some properties such as cycle-freeness or the existence of a root in each tree, in order to make it possible to keep using the trees uninterruptedly (to a possible extent). Our algorithm operates at a coarse-grain level, using atomic pairwise interactions in a way akin to recent population protocol models. The algorithm relies on a perpetual alternation of \emph{topology-induced splittings} and \emph{computation-induced mergings} of a forest of spanning trees. Each tree in the forest hosts exactly one token (also called root) that performs a random walk {\em inside} the tree, switching parent-child relationships as it crosses edges. When two tokens are located on both sides of a same edge, their trees are merged upon this edge and one token disappears. Whenever an edge that belongs to a tree disappears, its child endpoint regenerates a new token instantly. The main features of this approach is that both \emph{merging} and \emph{splitting} are purely localized phenomenons. In this paper, we present and motivate the algorithm, and we prove its correctness in arbitrary dynamic networks. Then we discuss several implementation choices around this general principle. Preliminary results regarding its analysis are also discussed, in particular an analytical expression of the expected merging time for two given trees in a static context.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Building Fastest Broadcast Trees in Periodically-Varying Graphs

Delay-tolerant networks (DTNs) are characterized by a possible absence of end-to-end communication routes at any instant. Still, connectivity can generally be established over time and space. The optimality of a temporal path (journey) in this context can be defined in several terms, including topological (e.g. {\em shortest} in hops) and temporal (e.g. {\em fastest, foremost}). The combinatorial problem of computing shortest, foremost, and fastest journeys {\em given full knowledge} of the network schedule was addressed a decade ago (Bui-Xuan {\it et al.}, 2003). A recent line of research has focused on the distributed version of this problem, where foremost, shortest or fastest {\em broadcast} are performed without knowing the schedule beforehand. In this paper we show how to build {\em fastest} broadcast trees (i.e., trees that minimize the global duration of the broadcast, however late the departure is) in Time-Varying Graphs where intermittent edges are available periodically (it is known that the problem is infeasible in the general case even if various parameters of the graph are know). We address the general case where contacts between nodes can have arbitrary durations and thus fastest routes may consist of a mixture of {\em continuous} and {\em discontinuous} segments (a more complex scenario than when contacts are {\em punctual} and thus routes are only discontinuous). Using the abstraction of \tclocks to compute the temporal distances, we solve the fastest broadcast problem by first learning, at the emitter, what is its time of {\em minimum temporal eccentricity} (i.e. the fastest time to reach all the other nodes), and second by building a {\em foremost} broadcast tree relative to this particular emission date.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Expressivity of Time-Varying Graphs and the Power of Waiting in Dynamic Networks

In infrastructure-less highly dynamic networks, computing and performing even basic tasks (such as routing and broadcasting) is a very challenging activity due to the fact that connectivity does not necessarily hold, and the network may actually be disconnected at every time instant. Clearly the task of designing protocols for these networks is less difficult if the environment allows waiting (i.e., it provides the nodes with store-carry-forward-like mechanisms such as local buffering) than if waiting is not feasible. No quantitative corroborations of this fact exist (e.g., no answer to the question: how much easier?). In this paper, we consider these qualitative questions about dynamic networks, modeled as time-varying (or evolving) graphs, where edges exist only at some times. We examine the difficulty of the environment in terms of the expressivity of the corresponding time-varying graph; that is in terms of the language generated by the feasible journeys in the graph. We prove that the set of languages $L_{nowait}$ when no waiting is allowed contains all computable languages. On the other end, using algebraic properties of quasi-orders, we prove that $L_{wait}$ is just the family of regular languages. In other words, we prove that, when waiting is no longer forbidden, the power of the accepting automaton (difficulty of the environment) drops drastically from being as powerful as a Turing machine, to becoming that of a Finite-State machine. This (perhaps surprisingly large) gap is a measure of the computational power of waiting. We also study bounded waiting; that is when waiting is allowed at a node only for at most $d$ time units. We prove the negative result that $L_{wait[d]} = L_{nowait}$; that is, the expressivity decreases only if the waiting is finite but unpredictable (i.e., under the control of the protocol designer and not of the environment).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

On the Feasibility of Maintenance Algorithms in Dynamic Graphs

Near ubiquitous mobile computing has led to intense interest in dynamic graph theory. This provides a new and challenging setting for algorithmics and complexity theory. For any graph-based problem, the rapid evolution of a (possibly disconnected) graph over time naturally leads to the important complexity question: is it better to calculate a new solution from scratch or to adapt the known solution on the prior graph to quickly provide a solution of guaranteed quality for the changed graph? In this paper, we demonstrate that the former is the best approach in some cases, but that there are cases where the latter is feasible. We prove that, under certain conditions, hard problems cannot even be approximated in any reasonable complexity bound --- i.e., even with a large amount of time, having a solution to a very similar graph does not help in computing a solution to the current graph. To achieve this, we formalize the idea as a maintenance algorithm. Using r-Regular Subgraph as the primary example we show that W[1]-hardness for the parameterized approximation problem implies the non-existence of a maintenance algorithm for the given approximation ratio. Conversely we show that Vertex Cover, which is fixed-parameter tractable, has a 2-approximate maintenance algorithm. The implications of NP-hardness and NPO-hardness are also explored.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Time-Varying Graphs and Dynamic Networks

The past few years have seen intensive research efforts carried out in some apparently unrelated areas of dynamic systems -- delay-tolerant networks, opportunistic-mobility networks, social networks -- obtaining closely related insights. Indeed, the concepts discovered in these investigations can be viewed as parts of the same conceptual universe; and the formal models proposed so far to express some specific concepts are components of a larger formal description of this universe. The main contribution of this paper is to integrate the vast collection of concepts, formalisms, and results found in the literature into a unified framework, which we call TVG (for time-varying graphs). Using this framework, it is possible to express directly in the same formalism not only the concepts common to all those different areas, but also those specific to each. Based on this definitional work, employing both existing results and original observations, we present a hierarchical classification of TVGs; each class corresponds to a significant property examined in the distributed computing literature. We then examine how TVGs can be used to study the evolution of network properties, and propose different techniques, depending on whether the indicators for these properties are a-temporal (as in the majority of existing studies) or temporal. Finally, we briefly discuss the introduction of randomness in TVGs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Time-Varying Graphs and Social Network Analysis: Temporal Indicators and Metrics

Most instruments - formalisms, concepts, and metrics - for social networks analysis fail to capture their dynamics. Typical systems exhibit different scales of dynamics, ranging from the fine-grain dynamics of interactions (which recently led researchers to consider temporal versions of distance, connectivity, and related indicators), to the evolution of network properties over longer periods of time. This paper proposes a general approach to study that evolution for both atemporal and temporal indicators, based respectively on sequences of static graphs and sequences of time-varying graphs that cover successive time-windows. All the concepts and indicators, some of which are new, are expressed using a time-varying graph formalism.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access