BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Sascha Hunold

Sascha Hunold appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingData Structures and Algorithms

Catalog footprint

What is connected

8works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Efficient Process-to-Node Mapping Algorithms for Stencil Computations

Good process-to-compute-node mappings can be decisive for well performing HPC applications. A special, important class of process-to-node mapping problems is the problem of mapping processes that communicate in a sparse stencil pattern to Cartesian grids. By thoroughly exploiting the inherently present structure in this type of problem, we devise three novel distributed algorithms that are able to handle arbitrary stencil communication patterns effectively. We analyze the expected performance of our algorithms based on an abstract model of inter- and intra-node communication. An extensive experimental evaluation on several HPC machines shows that our algorithms are up to two orders of magnitude faster in running time than a (sequential) high-quality general graph mapping tool, while obtaining similar results in communication performance. Furthermore, our algorithms also achieve significantly better mapping quality compared to previous state-of-the-art Cartesian grid mapping algorithms. This results in up to a threefold performance improvement of an MPI_Neighbor_alltoall exchange operation. Our new algorithms can be used to implement the MPI_Cart_create functionality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Scheduling.jl -- Collaborative and Reproducible Scheduling Research with Julia

We introduce the Scheduling.jl Julia package, which is intended for collaboratively conducting scheduling research and for sharing implementations of algorithms. It provides the fundamental building blocks for implementing scheduling algorithms following the three-field notation of Graham et al., i.e., it has functionality to describe machine environments, job characteristics, and optimality criteria. Our goal is to foster algorithm and code sharing in the scheduling community. Scheduling.jl can also be used to support teaching scheduling theory in classes. We will show the main functionalities of Scheduling.jl and give an example on how to use it by comparing different algorithms for the problem of P||Cmax .

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Message-Combining Algorithms for Isomorphic, Sparse Collective Communication

Isomorphic (sparse) collective communication is a form of collective communication in which all involved processes communicate in small, identically structured neighborhoods of other processes. Isomorphic neighborhoods are defined via an embedding of the processes in a regularly structured topology, e.g., $d$-dimensional torus, which may correspond to the physical communication network of the underlying system. Isomorphic collective communication is useful for implementing stencil and other regular, sparse distributed computations, where the assumption that all processes behave (almost) symmetrically is justified. In this paper, we show how efficient message-combining communication schedules for isomorphic, sparse collective communication can easily and efficiently be computed by purely local computations. We give schemes for \emph{isomorphic \alltoall} and \emph{\allgather} communication that reduce the number of communication rounds and thereby the communication latency from $s$ to at most $Nd$, for neighborhoods consisting of $s$ processes with the (small) factor $N$ depending on the structure of the neighborhood and the capabilities of the communication system. Using these schedules, we give \emph{zero-copy implementations} of the isomorphic collectives using MPI and its derived datatypes to eliminate explicit, process-local copy operations. By benchmarking the collective communication algorithms against straightforward implementations and against the corresponding MPI neighborhood collectives, we document significant latency improvements of our implementations for block sizes of up to a few kilobytes. We discuss further optimizations for computing even better schedules, some of which have been implemented and benchmarked.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

MPI Benchmarking Revisited: Experimental Design and Reproducibility

The Message Passing Interface (MPI) is the prevalent programming model used on today's supercomputers. Therefore, MPI library developers are looking for the best possible performance (shortest run-time) of individual MPI functions across many different supercomputer architectures. Several MPI benchmark suites have been developed to assess the performance of MPI implementations. Unfortunately, the outcome of these benchmarks is often neither reproducible nor statistically sound. To overcome these issues, we show which experimental factors have an impact on the run-time of blocking collective MPI operations and how to control them. We address the problem of process and clock synchronization in MPI benchmarks. Finally, we present a new experimental method that allows us to obtain reproducible and statistically sound MPI measurements.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

MPI Derived Datatypes: Performance Expectations and Status Quo

We examine natural expectations on communication performance using MPI derived datatypes in comparison to the baseline, "raw" performance of communicating simple, non-contiguous data layouts. We show that common MPI libraries sometimes violate these datatype performance expectations, and discuss reasons why this happens, but also show cases where MPI libraries perform well. Our findings are in many ways surprising and disappointing. First, the performance of derived datatypes is sometimes worse than the semantically equivalent packing and unpacking using the corresponding MPI functionality. Second, the communication performance equivalence stated in the MPI standard between a single contiguous datatype and the repetition of its constituent datatype does not hold universally. Third, the heuristics that are typically employed by MPI libraries at type-commit time are insufficient to enforce natural performance guidelines, and better type normalization heuristics may have a significant performance impact. We show cases where all the MPI type constructors are necessary to achieve the expected performance for certain data layouts. We describe our benchmarking approach to verify the datatype performance guidelines, and present extensive verification results for different MPI libraries.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

PGMPI: Automatically Verifying Self-Consistent MPI Performance Guidelines

The Message Passing Interface (MPI) is the most commonly used application programming interface for process communication on current large-scale parallel systems. Due to the scale and complexity of modern parallel architectures, it is becoming increasingly difficult to optimize MPI libraries, as many factors can influence the communication performance. To assist MPI developers and users, we propose an automatic way to check whether MPI libraries respect self-consistent performance guidelines for collective communication operations. We introduce the PGMPI framework to detect violations of performance guidelines through benchmarking. Our experimental results show that PGMPI can pinpoint undesired and often unexpected performance degradations of collective MPI operations. We demonstrate how to overcome performance issues of several libraries by adapting the algorithmic implementations of their respective collective MPI calls.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

A Survey on Reproducibility in Parallel Computing

We summarize the results of a survey on reproducibility in parallel computing, which was conducted during the Euro-Par conference in August 2015. The survey form was handed out to all participants of the conference and the workshops. The questionnaire, which specifically targeted the parallel computing community, contained questions in four different categories: general questions on reproducibility, the current state of reproducibility, the reproducibility of the participants' own papers, and questions about the participants' familiarity with tools, software, or open-source software licenses used for reproducible research.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

On the State and Importance of Reproducible Experimental Research in Parallel Computing

Computer science is also an experimental science. This is particularly the case for parallel computing, which is in a total state of flux, and where experiments are necessary to substantiate, complement, and challenge theoretical modeling and analysis. Here, experimental work is as important as are advances in theory, that are indeed often driven by the experimental findings. In parallel computing, scientific contributions presented in research articles are therefore often based on experimental data, with a substantial part devoted to presenting and discussing the experimental findings. As in all of experimental science, experiments must be presented in a way that makes reproduction by other researchers possible, in principle. Despite appearance to the contrary, we contend that reproducibility plays a small role, and is typically not achieved. As can be found, articles often do not have a sufficiently detailed description of their experiments, and do not make available the software used to obtain the claimed results. As a consequence, parallel computational results are most often impossible to reproduce, often questionable, and therefore of little or no scientific value. We believe that the description of how to reproduce findings should play an important part in every serious, experiment-based parallel computing research article. We aim to initiate a discussion of the reproducibility issue in parallel computing, and elaborate on the importance of reproducible research for (1) better and sounder technical/scientific papers, (2) a sounder and more efficient review process and (3) more effective collective work. This paper expresses our current view on the subject and should be read as a position statement for discussion and future work. We do not consider the related (but no less important) issue of the quality of the experimental design.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access