BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jesper Larsson Träff

Jesper Larsson Träff contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingData Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Doubly-pipelined, Dual-root Reduction-to-all Algorithm and Implementation

We discuss a simple, binary tree-based algorithm for the collective allreduce (reduction-to-all, MPI_Allreduce) operation for parallel systems consisting of $p$ suitably interconnected processors. The algorithm can be doubly pipelined to exploit bidirectional (telephone-like) communication capabilities of the communication system. In order to make the algorithm more symmetric, the processors are organized into two rooted trees with communication between the two roots. For each pipeline block, each non-leaf processor takes three communication steps, consisting in receiving and sending from and to the two children, and sending and receiving to and from the root. In a round-based, uniform, linear-cost communication model in which simultaneously sending and receiving $n$ data elements takes time $α+βn$ for system dependent constants $α$ (communication start-up latency) and $β$ (time per element), the time for the allreduce operation on vectors of $m$ elements is $O(\log p+\sqrt{m\log p})+3βm$ by suitable choice of the pipeline block size. We compare the performance of an implementation in MPI to similar reduce followed by broadcast algorithms, and the native MPI_Allreduce collective on a modern, small $36\times 32$ processor cluster. With proper choice of the number of pipeline blocks, it is possible to achieve better performance than pipelined algorithms that do not exploit bidirectional communication.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

$k$-ported vs. $k$-lane Broadcast, Scatter, and Alltoall Algorithms

In $k$-ported message-passing systems, a processor can simultaneously receive $k$ different messages from $k$ other processors, and send $k$ different messages to $k$ other processors that may or may not be different from the processors from which messages are received. Modern clustered systems may not have such capabilities. Instead, compute nodes consisting of $n$ processors can simultaneously send and receive $k$ messages from other nodes, by letting $k$ processors on the nodes concurrently send and receive at most one message. We pose the question of how to design good algorithms for this $k$-lane model, possibly by adapting algorithms devised for the traditional $k$-ported model. We discuss and compare a number of (non-optimal) $k$-lane algorithms for the broadcast, scatter and alltoall collective operations (as found in, e.g., MPI), and experimentally evaluate these on a small $36\times 32$-node cluster with a dual OmniPath network (corresponding to $k=2$). Results are preliminary.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Decomposing Collectives for Exploiting Multi-lane Communication

Many modern, high-performance systems increase the cumulated node-bandwidth by offering more than a single communication network and/or by having multiple connections to the network. Efficient algorithms and implementations for collective operations as found in, e.g., MPI must be explicitly designed for such multi-lane capabilities. We discuss a model for the design of multi-lane algorithms, and in particular give a recipe for converting any standard, one-ported, (pipelined) communication tree algorithm into a multi-lane algorithm that can effectively use $k$ lanes simultaneously. We first examine the problem from the perspective of \emph{self-consistent performance guidelines}, and give simple, \emph{full-lane, mock-up implementations} of the MPI broadcast, reduction, scan, gather, scatter, allgather, and alltoall operations using only similar operations of the given MPI library itself in such a way that multi-lane capabilities can be exploited. These implementations which rely on a decomposition of the communication domain into communicators for nodes and lanes are full-fledged and readily usable implementations of the MPI collectives. The mock-up implementations, contrary to expectation, in many cases show surprising performance improvements with different MPI libraries on a small 36-node dual-socket, dual-lane Intel OmniPath cluster, indicating severe problems with the native MPI library implementations. Our full-lane implementations are in many cases considerably more than a factor of two faster than the corresponding MPI collectives. We see similar results on the larger Vienna Scientific Cluster, VSC-3. These experiments indicate considerable room for improvement of the MPI collectives in current libraries including more efficient use of multi-lane communication.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Efficient Process-to-Node Mapping Algorithms for Stencil Computations

Good process-to-compute-node mappings can be decisive for well performing HPC applications. A special, important class of process-to-node mapping problems is the problem of mapping processes that communicate in a sparse stencil pattern to Cartesian grids. By thoroughly exploiting the inherently present structure in this type of problem, we devise three novel distributed algorithms that are able to handle arbitrary stencil communication patterns effectively. We analyze the expected performance of our algorithms based on an abstract model of inter- and intra-node communication. An extensive experimental evaluation on several HPC machines shows that our algorithms are up to two orders of magnitude faster in running time than a (sequential) high-quality general graph mapping tool, while obtaining similar results in communication performance. Furthermore, our algorithms also achieve significantly better mapping quality compared to previous state-of-the-art Cartesian grid mapping algorithms. This results in up to a threefold performance improvement of an MPI_Neighbor_alltoall exchange operation. Our new algorithms can be used to implement the MPI_Cart_create functionality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

High-Quality Hierarchical Process Mapping

Partitioning graphs into blocks of roughly equal size such that few edges run between blocks is a frequently needed operation when processing graphs on a parallel computer. When a topology of a distributed system is known an important task is then to map the blocks of the partition onto the processors such that the overall communication cost is reduced. We present novel multilevel algorithms that integrate graph partitioning and process mapping. Important ingredients of our algorithm include fast label propagation, more localized local search, initial partitioning, as well as a compressed data structure to compute processor distances without storing a distance matrix. Experiments indicate that our algorithms speed up the overall mapping process and, due to the integrated multilevel approach, also find much better solutions in practice. For example, one configuration of our algorithm yields better solutions than the previous state-of-the-art in terms of mapping quality while being a factor 62 faster. Compared to the currently fastest iterated multilevel mapping algorithm Scotch, we obtain 16% better solutions while investing slightly more running time.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access