Researcher profile

Samer B. Nashed

Samer B. Nashed contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Causal Explanations for Sequential Decision Making Under Uncertainty

We introduce a novel framework for causal explanations of stochastic, sequential decision-making systems built on the well-studied structural causal model paradigm for causal reasoning. This single framework can identify multiple, semantically distinct explanations for agent actions -- something not previously possible. In this paper, we establish exact methods and several approximation techniques for causal inference on Markov decision processes using this framework, followed by results on the applicability of the exact methods and some run time bounds. We discuss several scenarios that illustrate the framework's flexibility and the results of experiments with human subjects that confirm the benefits of this approach.

preprint2023arXiv

Fairness and Sequential Decision Making: Limits, Lessons, and Opportunities

As automated decision making and decision assistance systems become common in everyday life, research on the prevention or mitigation of potential harms that arise from decisions made by these systems has proliferated. However, various research communities have independently conceptualized these harms, envisioned potential applications, and proposed interventions. The result is a somewhat fractured landscape of literature focused generally on ensuring decision-making algorithms "do the right thing". In this paper, we compare and discuss work across two major subsets of this literature: algorithmic fairness, which focuses primarily on predictive systems, and ethical decision making, which focuses primarily on sequential decision making and planning. We explore how each of these settings has articulated its normative concerns, the viability of different techniques for these different settings, and how ideas from each setting may have utility for the other.

preprint2020arXiv

Laser2Vec: Similarity-based Retrieval for Robotic Perception Data

As mobile robot capabilities improve and deployment times increase, tools to analyze the growing volume of data are becoming necessary. Current state-of-the-art logging, playback, and exploration systems are insufficient for practitioners seeking to discover systemic points of failure in robotic systems. This paper presents a suite of algorithms for similarity-based queries of robotic perception data and implements a system for storing 2D LiDAR data from many deployments cheaply and evaluating top-k queries for complete or partial scans efficiently. We generate compressed representations of laser scans via a convolutional variational autoencoder and store them in a database, where a light-weight dense network for distance function approximation is run at query time. Our query evaluator leverages the local continuity of the embedding space to generate evaluation orders that, in expectation, dominate full linear scans of the database. The accuracy, robustness, scalability, and efficiency of our system is tested on real-world data gathered from dozens of deployments and synthetic data generated by corrupting real data. We find our system accurately and efficiently identifies similar scans across a number of episodes where the robot encountered the same location, or similar indoor structures or objects.