Source author record

S. G. Heinemann

S. G. Heinemann appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Validation scheme for solar coronal models -- constraints from multi-perspective observations in EUV and white-light

Context: In this paper we present a validation scheme to investigate the quality of coronal magnetic field models, which is based upon comparisons with observational data from multiple sources. Aims: Many of these coronal models may use a range of initial parameters that produce a large number of physically reasonable field configurations. However, that does not mean that these results are reliable and comply with the observations. With an appropriate validation scheme the quality of a coronal model can be assessed. Methods: The validation scheme is developed on the example of the EUropean Heliospheric FORecasting Information Asset (EUHFORIA) coronal model. For observational comparison we use EUV and white-light data to detect coronal features on the surface (open magnetic field areas) and off-limb (streamer and loop) structures from multiple perspectives (Earth view and the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory - STEREO). The validation scheme can be applied to any coronal model that produces magnetic field line topology. Results: We show its applicability by using that validation scheme on a large set of model configurations, which can be efficiently reduced to an ideal set of parameters that matches best with observational data. Conclusions: We conclude that by using a combined empirical visual classification with a mathematical scheme of topology metrics a very efficient and rather objective quality assessment for coronal models can be performed.

preprint2020arXiv

Deriving CME density from remote sensing data and comparison to in-situ measurements

We determine the 3D geometry and deprojected mass of 29 well-observed coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and their interplanetary counterparts (ICMEs) using combined STEREO-SOHO white-light data. From the geometry parameters we calculate the volume of the CME for the magnetic ejecta (flux-rope type geometry) and sheath structure (shell-like geometry resembling the (I)CME frontal rim). Working under the assumption that the CME mass is roughly equally distributed within a specific volume, we expand the CME self-similarly and calculate the CME density for distances close to the Sun (15-30 Rs) and at 1AU. Specific trends are derived comparing calculated and in-situ measured proton densities at 1AU, though large uncertainties are revealed due to the unknown mass and geometry evolution: i) a moderate correlation for the magnetic structure having a mass that stays rather constant (~0.56-0.59), and ii) a weak correlation for the sheath density (~0.26) by assuming the sheath region is an extra mass - as expected for a mass pile-up process - that is in its amount comparable to the initial CME deprojected mass. High correlations are derived between in-situ measured sheath density and the solar wind density (~ -0.73) and solar wind speed (~0.56) as measured 24 hours ahead of the arrival of the disturbance. This gives additional confirmation that the sheath-plasma indeed stems from piled-up solar wind material. While the CME interplanetary propagation speed is not related to the sheath density, the size of the CME may play some role in how much material could be piled up.